ABSTRACTS

PURVIS E. BOYETTE. “Sexual Metaphor in Milton's Cosmogony, Physics and Ontology.”Renaissance Papers, 1967, 93–103.SEYMOUR CHATMAN. “Milton's Participial Style.”PMLA, 83, 5, 1386–1399.BLOSSOM FEINSTEIN. “On the Hymns of John Milton and Gian Francesco Pico.”Comparative Literature, XX, iii, 245–253.ALBERT W. FIELDS. “Milton and Self‐Knowledge.”PMLA, 83, 2, 392–399.CHRRSROMER GROSE. “Some Uses of Sensuous Immediacy in PL.” HLQ, XXXI, 211–222.NATHANIEL H. HENRY. “The Mystery of Milton's Muse.”Renaissance Papers, 1967, 69–83.LEE A. JACOBUS. L L‘Thaumaturgike’ in PL.“Delivered at MLA, December, 1968.MAURICE KELLEY. “Milton and the Trinity.” Delivered at MLA, December, 1968.WILLIAM A. MCQUEEN. “Point of View in PL: Books I‐IV.”Renaissance Papers, 1967, 85–92.VIRGINIA MOLLENKOTT. “Milton's Mortalism: Treatise Vs. Poetry.”SCN, XXVI, iii, 51–52.LELAND RYKEN. “Milton and the Apocalyptic.”HLQ, XXXI, 223–238.PAUL R. SELLIN. “Caesar Calandrini, the London Dutch, and Milton's Quarrels in Holland.”HLQ, XXXI, 239–249.PAUL R. SELLIN. “Puritan and Anglican: A Dutch Perspective.”SP, LXV, 5, 804–815,GEORGE F. SENSABAUGH. “That Vile Mercenary, Milton.”Pacific Coast Philology, I11 (INS), 5–15.MASON TuNG. “Samson Impatiens: A Reinterpretation of Milton's SA.” Texas Studies in Literaturc and Language, IX, iv, 475–492.JOSEPH ANTHONY WITTREICH, JR. “The ‘Satanism’ of Blake and Shelley Reconsidered.”SP, LXV, 5, 816–833.JOSEPH ANTHONY WITTREICH, JR. “Milton's ‘Destin'd Urn': The Art of Lycidas.” PMLA, 84, 1, 60–70.B. A. WRIGHT. “A Milton Crux.') N&Q, XV, x, 377.