Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Sharing knowledge, skills and things: How institutes can benefit from centralised fieldwork management
View through CrossRef
Planning fieldwork can be overwhelming and time consuming, especially for those who have never done it before, such as early stage PhD or undergraduate students. At the first day of a fieldwork, it is not uncommon to already be exhausted from extensive logistics management, selection and acquisition of adequate equipment and understanding regulations. Not having had the time or assistance to properly learn how to use a field instrument may impact the quality of collected data. Lone, inexperienced fieldworkers in difficult terrain may be confronted with additional safety challenges.We present ideas for institutional frameworks that support researchers in their fieldwork and share experience from our work as fieldwork technicians at the Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne. We suggest that many fieldwork-related resources can be shared across research groups and demonstrate how we provide centralised support to researchers and students in the management of their fieldwork goals, equipment and logistics.Institute-wide digital libraries managing field and safety equipment can be a useful and sustainable tool to avoid unnecessary double purchases across research groups and to re-use equipment after a project has finished. Streamlining the maintenance, repair, acquisition and improvement of equipment under one shared budget decreases the financial burden on individual research projects and groups. Dedicated technical staff can advise which field equipment best serves its purposes in the framework of the research question and provide innovative support for new instrumentation design. Centralising training on using the field equipment in a safe way not only improves the quality of the field data, but also makes sure that this knowledge is not lost in the short-term turnover of PhD projects.We further show that safety should always be considered in fieldwork planning and that institutes should provide comprehensive guidelines for this. Safety training and advice on risk assessment adapted to various fieldwork settings should be offered and institute members should be encouraged to regularly refresh their training. Finally, accompanying researchers and students directly to the field does not only avoid risky lone working, but can provide external, more technical expertise that can benefit the quality of the fieldwork outcome.
Title: Sharing knowledge, skills and things: How institutes can benefit from centralised fieldwork management
Description:
Planning fieldwork can be overwhelming and time consuming, especially for those who have never done it before, such as early stage PhD or undergraduate students.
At the first day of a fieldwork, it is not uncommon to already be exhausted from extensive logistics management, selection and acquisition of adequate equipment and understanding regulations.
Not having had the time or assistance to properly learn how to use a field instrument may impact the quality of collected data.
Lone, inexperienced fieldworkers in difficult terrain may be confronted with additional safety challenges.
We present ideas for institutional frameworks that support researchers in their fieldwork and share experience from our work as fieldwork technicians at the Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne.
We suggest that many fieldwork-related resources can be shared across research groups and demonstrate how we provide centralised support to researchers and students in the management of their fieldwork goals, equipment and logistics.
Institute-wide digital libraries managing field and safety equipment can be a useful and sustainable tool to avoid unnecessary double purchases across research groups and to re-use equipment after a project has finished.
Streamlining the maintenance, repair, acquisition and improvement of equipment under one shared budget decreases the financial burden on individual research projects and groups.
Dedicated technical staff can advise which field equipment best serves its purposes in the framework of the research question and provide innovative support for new instrumentation design.
Centralising training on using the field equipment in a safe way not only improves the quality of the field data, but also makes sure that this knowledge is not lost in the short-term turnover of PhD projects.
We further show that safety should always be considered in fieldwork planning and that institutes should provide comprehensive guidelines for this.
Safety training and advice on risk assessment adapted to various fieldwork settings should be offered and institute members should be encouraged to regularly refresh their training.
Finally, accompanying researchers and students directly to the field does not only avoid risky lone working, but can provide external, more technical expertise that can benefit the quality of the fieldwork outcome.
Related Results
Geological fieldwork in the time of COVID-19: Comparing the student learning experience during virtual and outdoor fieldwork
Geological fieldwork in the time of COVID-19: Comparing the student learning experience during virtual and outdoor fieldwork
Fieldwork is a pedagogical cornerstone of many geoscience degrees. During the academic year 2020-21, the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic made outdoors fieldwork difficult, resulting in...
Disclosing the Ethnographic Self
Disclosing the Ethnographic Self
We are our own subjects. How our subjectivity becomes entangled in the lives of others is and has always been our topic. (Denzin 27)This article reflects on the process of disclosi...
The impact of employees’ relationships on tacit knowledge sharing
The impact of employees’ relationships on tacit knowledge sharing
Purpose– This paper aims to study the impact of individual relationships on tacit knowledge sharing in the company setting of compulsory bond, expressive bond, instrumental bond an...
Knowledge Sharing Activities Among Librarians at The National Research and Innovation Agency Library (BRIN)
Knowledge Sharing Activities Among Librarians at The National Research and Innovation Agency Library (BRIN)
Background: This research is motivated by the knowledge-sharing activities among librarians, which is an essential aspect for a special library to develop with various innovations ...
Skills in European higher education mobility programmes: outlining a conceptual framework
Skills in European higher education mobility programmes: outlining a conceptual framework
PurposeCredit mobility has been acknowledged not only to broaden personal and intellectual horizons but also to have positive effects on the skills development and employability of...
Nexus of knowledge-management enablers, trust and knowledge-sharing in research universities
Nexus of knowledge-management enablers, trust and knowledge-sharing in research universities
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the knowledge sharing behavior of faculty members of research universities in emerging economies after considering the predicting ro...
Leadership styles, knowledge sharing (attitudes and behaviors) and project success: insights from theory of reasoned action and social exchange theory
Leadership styles, knowledge sharing (attitudes and behaviors) and project success: insights from theory of reasoned action and social exchange theory
Purpose
This paper proposes a mechanism explaining how transformational leadership and transactional leadership influence project success. Drawing on the theory o...
Virtual fieldwork in the Betic Cordillera, SE-Spain
Virtual fieldwork in the Betic Cordillera, SE-Spain
<p>The master&#8217;s degree programmes Earth Structure and Dynamics and Earth Life and Climate at Utrecht University, The Netherlands, include the option to ...

