Transcription termination and readthrough in African swine fever virus

IntroductionAfrican swine fever virus (ASFV) is a nucleocytoplasmic large DNA virus (NCLDV) that encodes its own host-like RNA polymerase (RNAP) and factors required to produce mature mRNA. The formation of accurate mRNA 3′ ends by ASFV RNAP depends on transcription termination, likely enabled by a combination of sequence motifs and transcription factors, although these are poorly understood. The termination of any RNAP is rarely 100% efficient, and the transcriptional “readthrough” at terminators can generate long mRNAs which may interfere with the expression of downstream genes. ASFV transcriptome analyses reveal a landscape of heterogeneous mRNA 3′ termini, likely a combination of bona fide termination sites and the result of mRNA degradation and processing. While short-read sequencing (SRS) like 3′ RNA-seq indicates an accumulation of mRNA 3′ ends at specific sites, it cannot inform about which promoters and transcription start sites (TSSs) directed their synthesis, i.e., information about the complete and unprocessed mRNAs at nucleotide resolution. MethodsHere, we report a rigorous analysis of full-length ASFV transcripts using long-read sequencing (LRS). We systematically compared transcription termination sites predicted from SRS 3′ RNA-seq with 3′ ends mapped by LRS during early and late infection. ResultsUsing in-vitro transcription assays, we show that recombinant ASFV RNAP terminates transcription at polyT stretches in the non-template strand, similar to the archaeal RNAP or eukaryotic RNAPIII, unaided by secondary RNA structures or predicted viral termination factors. Our results cement this T-rich motif (U-rich in the RNA) as a universal transcription termination signal in ASFV. Many genes share the usage of the same terminators, while genes can also use a range of terminators to generate transcript isoforms varying enormously in length. A key factor in the latter phenomenon is the highly abundant terminator readthrough we observed, which is more prevalent during late compared with early infection. DiscussionThis indicates that ASFV mRNAs under the control of late gene promoters utilize different termination mechanisms and factors to early promoters and/or that cellular factors influence the viral transcriptome landscape differently during the late stages of infection.