Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A legal portrait of President Koen Lenaerts

View through CrossRef
Abstract This article draws a legal portrait of President Lenaerts, in an attempt to critically examine both his description of the institution to which he belongs, and his influence upon it. It is based on a comprehensive study of his public and formalised statements (published or on podcasts) since the year of his election in 2015. Based on these research materials, this article examines the contextual elements of Lenaerts’ personality, career path, and the challenges currently facing the European Court of Justice. It also illustrates that Lenaerts is an exceptionally gifted legal mind, educated from his earliest years in Community law, with a career both shaped by and devoted to the Court. The article argues that, although Lenaerts remains publicly discreet about the Court’s internal organization, he nonetheless exerts a significant influence over its functioning and reform process. Furthermore, while Lenaerts publicly defends the idea of law as apolitical, he advances a normative vision of what EU law ought to be and asserts that its current form serves the interests of European citizens. Lenaerts is an influential President who skilfully leverages his scholarly authority to defend the Court and its jurisprudence, presented as coherent. Yet, his position is not without ambiguity, as he frequently shifts roles – scholar, citizen, or President – while defending a specific point. A significant part of his influence lies in the subtle gaps between his professed positions and his concrete actions, as well as between his dual role as scholar and as President—two interstices where institutional power is exercised less visibly, but no less effectively.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: A legal portrait of President Koen Lenaerts
Description:
Abstract This article draws a legal portrait of President Lenaerts, in an attempt to critically examine both his description of the institution to which he belongs, and his influence upon it.
It is based on a comprehensive study of his public and formalised statements (published or on podcasts) since the year of his election in 2015.
Based on these research materials, this article examines the contextual elements of Lenaerts’ personality, career path, and the challenges currently facing the European Court of Justice.
It also illustrates that Lenaerts is an exceptionally gifted legal mind, educated from his earliest years in Community law, with a career both shaped by and devoted to the Court.
The article argues that, although Lenaerts remains publicly discreet about the Court’s internal organization, he nonetheless exerts a significant influence over its functioning and reform process.
Furthermore, while Lenaerts publicly defends the idea of law as apolitical, he advances a normative vision of what EU law ought to be and asserts that its current form serves the interests of European citizens.
Lenaerts is an influential President who skilfully leverages his scholarly authority to defend the Court and its jurisprudence, presented as coherent.
Yet, his position is not without ambiguity, as he frequently shifts roles – scholar, citizen, or President – while defending a specific point.
A significant part of his influence lies in the subtle gaps between his professed positions and his concrete actions, as well as between his dual role as scholar and as President—two interstices where institutional power is exercised less visibly, but no less effectively.

Related Results

THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
Problem setting. Digitalization has recently become increasingly important in the professional everyday life of a lawyer. Since 2020, trends in the automation of legal processes ha...
Populisme Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penafsiran Perkara-Perkara pada Wilayah Open Legal Policy
Populisme Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penafsiran Perkara-Perkara pada Wilayah Open Legal Policy
In the past seven years, the striking characteristic of cases filed before the Constitutional Court (MK) has developed into cases at the open legal policy level. In open legal case...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Legal clinical education as a socially oriented educational activity in the field of law
Legal clinical education as a socially oriented educational activity in the field of law
The article is devoted to the general theoretical characteristics of one of the non-traditional forms and methods of teaching — legal clinical education as a means of forming a new...
Peralihan Kekuasaan Presiden dalam Lintasan Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia
Peralihan Kekuasaan Presiden dalam Lintasan Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia
The process of the power transition from President Soekarno to President Soeharto left the story of political issues. One of the important issues marked the downfall of Sukarnoaspr...
Corporations in Ukrainian Law
Corporations in Ukrainian Law
This article deals with the special development of the company (or rather corporate) law in Ukrainian legal system. The current legislation does not set the concept of corporation....

Back to Top