Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Alexandrian Footnote in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura

View through CrossRef
Abstract This paper contributes evidence to support the widely accepted view that Lucretius may justly be regarded by the reader as a Callimachean poet by synthesizing and analyzing Lucretius’ use of the so-called ‘Alexandrian footnote’ in the DRN. Although most scholars have come to agree with Kenney that Lucretius embraces many of the same poetic ideals as his contemporaries, there are still some who remain skeptical of Kenney’s thesis, and, while Kenney adduces the most prominent parts of the DRN that show signs of Alexandrianism, in fact he only scratches the surface of the extent to which Lucretius practices his own version of Roman neo-Callimacheanism. Moreover, very few of those who accept Kenney’s results have followed his lead by adding corroborating evidence. It is still very much worthwhile, therefore, to explore this aspect of Lucretius’ poetic artistry; this paper’s analysis of the Alexandrian footnote provides further proof that Kenney’s argument is correct, and it expands on his thesis by showing how integral Alexandrian poetic techniques are to Lucretius’ philosophical purposes.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: The Alexandrian Footnote in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura
Description:
Abstract This paper contributes evidence to support the widely accepted view that Lucretius may justly be regarded by the reader as a Callimachean poet by synthesizing and analyzing Lucretius’ use of the so-called ‘Alexandrian footnote’ in the DRN.
Although most scholars have come to agree with Kenney that Lucretius embraces many of the same poetic ideals as his contemporaries, there are still some who remain skeptical of Kenney’s thesis, and, while Kenney adduces the most prominent parts of the DRN that show signs of Alexandrianism, in fact he only scratches the surface of the extent to which Lucretius practices his own version of Roman neo-Callimacheanism.
Moreover, very few of those who accept Kenney’s results have followed his lead by adding corroborating evidence.
It is still very much worthwhile, therefore, to explore this aspect of Lucretius’ poetic artistry; this paper’s analysis of the Alexandrian footnote provides further proof that Kenney’s argument is correct, and it expands on his thesis by showing how integral Alexandrian poetic techniques are to Lucretius’ philosophical purposes.

Related Results

The English Voices of Lucretius, from Lucy Hutchinson to John Mason Good
The English Voices of Lucretius, from Lucy Hutchinson to John Mason Good
Abstract This chapter considers the ways in which writers from the mid-seventeenth to the late eighteenth century sought to give the Roman poet Lucretius an English ...
Lucretius Renaissance Thought
Lucretius Renaissance Thought
Even before its celebrated rediscovery by Poggio Bracciolini in 1417, Lucretius’s didactic Epicurean epic De rerum natura was famous as a Roman masterpiece celebrated by Virgil and...
Lucretius
Lucretius
Lucretius (Titus Lucretius Carus, b. c. 94–d. c. 55 or 51 bce) was one of the most important Latin poets of Antiquity. He was a predecessor of Virgil, who was profoundly influenced...
The Birth of Philosophy
The Birth of Philosophy
The chapter focuses on the beginning of Deleuze’s career, charting his confrontation with Simondon, from whose work he takes the notion of crystal individuation. It then turns to D...
De Rerum Natura IV
De Rerum Natura IV
Book IV of Lucretius' great philosophical poem deals mainly with the psychology of sensation and thought. The heart of this book is a new text, incorporating the latest scholarship...
Lucretius: De Rerum Natura
Lucretius: De Rerum Natura
For a work written more than two thousand years ago, in a society in many ways quite alien to our own, Lucretius' De Rerum Natura contains much of striking, even startling, contemp...
Lucretius on the Ennian Cosmos
Lucretius on the Ennian Cosmos
This chapter approaches Lucretius’ engagement with Ennius on Lucretius’ own terms and explores how the Annales serves Lucretius as a model (or a foil, rather) for poetry about the ...

Back to Top