Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Alexandrian Footnote in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This paper contributes evidence to support the widely accepted view that Lucretius may justly be regarded by the reader as a Callimachean poet by synthesizing and analyzing Lucretius’ use of the so-called ‘Alexandrian footnote’ in the DRN. Although most scholars have come to agree with Kenney that Lucretius embraces many of the same poetic ideals as his contemporaries, there are still some who remain skeptical of Kenney’s thesis, and, while Kenney adduces the most prominent parts of the DRN that show signs of Alexandrianism, in fact he only scratches the surface of the extent to which Lucretius practices his own version of Roman neo-Callimacheanism. Moreover, very few of those who accept Kenney’s results have followed his lead by adding corroborating evidence. It is still very much worthwhile, therefore, to explore this aspect of Lucretius’ poetic artistry; this paper’s analysis of the Alexandrian footnote provides further proof that Kenney’s argument is correct, and it expands on his thesis by showing how integral Alexandrian poetic techniques are to Lucretius’ philosophical purposes.
Title: The Alexandrian Footnote in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura
Description:
Abstract
This paper contributes evidence to support the widely accepted view that Lucretius may justly be regarded by the reader as a Callimachean poet by synthesizing and analyzing Lucretius’ use of the so-called ‘Alexandrian footnote’ in the DRN.
Although most scholars have come to agree with Kenney that Lucretius embraces many of the same poetic ideals as his contemporaries, there are still some who remain skeptical of Kenney’s thesis, and, while Kenney adduces the most prominent parts of the DRN that show signs of Alexandrianism, in fact he only scratches the surface of the extent to which Lucretius practices his own version of Roman neo-Callimacheanism.
Moreover, very few of those who accept Kenney’s results have followed his lead by adding corroborating evidence.
It is still very much worthwhile, therefore, to explore this aspect of Lucretius’ poetic artistry; this paper’s analysis of the Alexandrian footnote provides further proof that Kenney’s argument is correct, and it expands on his thesis by showing how integral Alexandrian poetic techniques are to Lucretius’ philosophical purposes.
Related Results
The English Voices of Lucretius, from Lucy Hutchinson to John Mason Good
The English Voices of Lucretius, from Lucy Hutchinson to John Mason Good
Abstract
This chapter considers the ways in which writers from the mid-seventeenth to the late eighteenth century sought to give the Roman poet Lucretius an English ...
Lucretius Renaissance Thought
Lucretius Renaissance Thought
Even before its celebrated rediscovery by Poggio Bracciolini in 1417, Lucretius’s didactic Epicurean epic De rerum natura was famous as a Roman masterpiece celebrated by Virgil and...
De Rerum Natura IV
De Rerum Natura IV
Book IV of Lucretius' great philosophical poem deals mainly with the psychology of sensation and thought. The heart of this book is a new text, incorporating the latest scholarship...
Introduction
Introduction
This introductory chapter provides a background of Lucretius' life as poet and philosopher. It is important to know the elements of Epicurus' philosophy before embarking on the stu...
Lucretius on the Ennian Cosmos
Lucretius on the Ennian Cosmos
This chapter approaches Lucretius’ engagement with Ennius on Lucretius’ own terms and explores how the Annales serves Lucretius as a model (or a foil, rather) for poetry about the ...
Ennian Poetology and Literary Affiliation in Lucretius
Ennian Poetology and Literary Affiliation in Lucretius
This chapter adduces Ennius’ own metaphors for literary tradition and affiliation, specifically metempsychosis and the heart, in order to suggest that one of Lucretius’ central aim...

