Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Investment tokens as financial market tools

View through CrossRef
The rapid evolution of the digital financial asset market and its growing integration with traditional financial instruments, coupled with its global reach and unrestricted cross-border capital mobility, necessitate a thorough research of these market instruments. Specifically, it calls for an assessment of their potential as alternatives to conventional financial instruments. At the same time, there are many factors contributing to an increased risk of regulatory gaps in the financial market: structural vulnerability of the market of digital financial assets, high volatility of the value of crypto-assets, low transparency, the possibility of a spillover of risks from the market of digital financial assets to other financial markets, as well as the lack of regulatory consensus among financial regulators in the countries of the world. The research objective is to determine the role of investment tokens in today’s financial market, their utility in attracting investment resources on blockchain-based trading platforms, and the nuances of their classification as securities. The article delves into the core concepts and intricacies of regulating securities tokens and analyses quantitative metrics depicting the development of the investment token market and its relative share in the global financial market compared to other financial assets. Notably, the author outlines key criteria for securities regulators to consider when determining whether tokens should be classified as securities. The article reveals the main models of the initial offering of investment tokens, highlights their features, and shows their adaptability to changing conditions within the digital financial asset market and the evolving needs of market participants. It is evident that all current models for raising funds through investment tokens, including IEO, IDO, and STO sub-models, trace their roots back to the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) model and, fundamentally, do not differ significantly from traditional capital-raising models such as Initial Public Offering (IPO) and Secondary Public Offering (SPO) in traditional financial markets. This substantiates the need for global financial regulators to take actions aimed at officially classifying investment tokens as securities. Expanding securities legislation requirements to encompass issuers of investment tokens, particularly concerning information disclosure, promises to mitigate instances of fraud within the digital financial asset market. Such measures would fortify investor protection and reduce the vulnerability of financial markets as a whole.
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
Title: Investment tokens as financial market tools
Description:
The rapid evolution of the digital financial asset market and its growing integration with traditional financial instruments, coupled with its global reach and unrestricted cross-border capital mobility, necessitate a thorough research of these market instruments.
Specifically, it calls for an assessment of their potential as alternatives to conventional financial instruments.
At the same time, there are many factors contributing to an increased risk of regulatory gaps in the financial market: structural vulnerability of the market of digital financial assets, high volatility of the value of crypto-assets, low transparency, the possibility of a spillover of risks from the market of digital financial assets to other financial markets, as well as the lack of regulatory consensus among financial regulators in the countries of the world.
The research objective is to determine the role of investment tokens in today’s financial market, their utility in attracting investment resources on blockchain-based trading platforms, and the nuances of their classification as securities.
The article delves into the core concepts and intricacies of regulating securities tokens and analyses quantitative metrics depicting the development of the investment token market and its relative share in the global financial market compared to other financial assets.
Notably, the author outlines key criteria for securities regulators to consider when determining whether tokens should be classified as securities.
The article reveals the main models of the initial offering of investment tokens, highlights their features, and shows their adaptability to changing conditions within the digital financial asset market and the evolving needs of market participants.
It is evident that all current models for raising funds through investment tokens, including IEO, IDO, and STO sub-models, trace their roots back to the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) model and, fundamentally, do not differ significantly from traditional capital-raising models such as Initial Public Offering (IPO) and Secondary Public Offering (SPO) in traditional financial markets.
This substantiates the need for global financial regulators to take actions aimed at officially classifying investment tokens as securities.
Expanding securities legislation requirements to encompass issuers of investment tokens, particularly concerning information disclosure, promises to mitigate instances of fraud within the digital financial asset market.
Such measures would fortify investor protection and reduce the vulnerability of financial markets as a whole.

Related Results

Investing: The Concept and Classification of Schemes with Legal Significance
Investing: The Concept and Classification of Schemes with Legal Significance
Introduction: the theme of investment and investing invisibly but tangibly accompanies a person in modern life. The desire to increase their funds is becoming an urgent need of the...
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
One of the most important factors of the sustainable and safe development of the national economy is the availability of investment resources in the economy, the establishment of a...
Regulation of Blockchain Token Sales in the United States
Regulation of Blockchain Token Sales in the United States
Abstract This chapter provides an overview of how US securities regulation applies to the sale of cryptographic tokens using a distributed ledger, so-called initial ...
Market response and future performance of inefficient investment: Over-investment or under-investment
Market response and future performance of inefficient investment: Over-investment or under-investment
There have been many studies on the market response to investment spending, but only a few have examined the market response to the issue of over-investment or under-investment. Th...
Financial behavior of households and its determinants
Financial behavior of households and its determinants
The economic meaning of the term «financial behavior» has been researched. In this study, financial behavior is considered as a special type of economic behavior that is related to...
Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference
Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) demand considerable computations for inference due to the extensive parameters and the additional input tokens needed for visual informatio...
Interventions designed to improve financial capability: A systematic review
Interventions designed to improve financial capability: A systematic review
AbstractBackgroundThere is growing recognition that people need stronger financial capability to avoid and recover from financial difficulties and poverty. Researchers are testing ...
Dual Token Blockchains
Dual Token Blockchains
It is standard for blockchain platforms to issue native tokens, currencies, that users must own to operate within the platform. Some blockchains however decided to issue two tokens...

Back to Top