Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective: To identify methods to increase response to postal questionnaires. Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of any method to influence response to postal questionnaires. Studies reviewed: 292 randomised controlled trials including 258 315 participants Intervention reviewed: 75 strategies for influencing response to postal questionnaires. Main outcome measure: The proportion of completed or partially completed questionnaires returned. Results: The odds of response were more than doubled when a monetary incentive was used (odds ratio 2.02; 95% confidence interval 1.79 to 2.27) and almost doubled when incentives were not conditional on response (1.71; 1.29 to 2.26). Response was more likely when short questionnaires were used (1.86; 1.55 to 2.24). Personalised questionnaires and letters increased response (1.16; 1.06 to 1.28), as did the use of coloured ink (1.39; 1.16 to 1.67). The odds of response were more than doubled when the questionnaires were sent by recorded delivery (2.21; 1.51 to 3.25) and increased when stamped return envelopes were used (1.26; 1.13 to 1.41) and questionnaires were sent by first class post (1.12; 1.02 to 1.23). Contacting participants before sending questionnaires increased response (1.54; 1.24 to 1.92), as did follow up contact (1.44; 1.22 to 1.70) and providing non-respondents with a second copy of the questionnaire (1.41; 1.02 to 1.94). Questionnaires designed to be of more interest to participants were more likely to be returned (2.44; 1.99 to 3.01), but questionnaires containing questions of a sensitive nature were less likely to be returned (0.92; 0.87 to 0.98). Questionnaires originating from universities were more likely to be returned than were questionnaires from other sources, such as commercial organisations (1.31; 1.11 to 1.54). Conclusions: Health researchers using postal questionnaires can improve the quality of their research by using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review. What is already known on this topic Postal questionnaires are widely used in the collection of data in epidemiological studies and health research Non-response to postal questionnaires reduces the effective sample size and can introduce bias What this study adds This systematic review includes more randomised controlled trials than any previously published review or meta-analysis no questionnaire response The review has identified effective ways to increase response to postal questionnaires The review will be updated regularly in the Cochrane Library
Title: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review
Description:
Abstract Objective: To identify methods to increase response to postal questionnaires.
Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of any method to influence response to postal questionnaires.
Studies reviewed: 292 randomised controlled trials including 258 315 participants Intervention reviewed: 75 strategies for influencing response to postal questionnaires.
Main outcome measure: The proportion of completed or partially completed questionnaires returned.
Results: The odds of response were more than doubled when a monetary incentive was used (odds ratio 2.
02; 95% confidence interval 1.
79 to 2.
27) and almost doubled when incentives were not conditional on response (1.
71; 1.
29 to 2.
26).
Response was more likely when short questionnaires were used (1.
86; 1.
55 to 2.
24).
Personalised questionnaires and letters increased response (1.
16; 1.
06 to 1.
28), as did the use of coloured ink (1.
39; 1.
16 to 1.
67).
The odds of response were more than doubled when the questionnaires were sent by recorded delivery (2.
21; 1.
51 to 3.
25) and increased when stamped return envelopes were used (1.
26; 1.
13 to 1.
41) and questionnaires were sent by first class post (1.
12; 1.
02 to 1.
23).
Contacting participants before sending questionnaires increased response (1.
54; 1.
24 to 1.
92), as did follow up contact (1.
44; 1.
22 to 1.
70) and providing non-respondents with a second copy of the questionnaire (1.
41; 1.
02 to 1.
94).
Questionnaires designed to be of more interest to participants were more likely to be returned (2.
44; 1.
99 to 3.
01), but questionnaires containing questions of a sensitive nature were less likely to be returned (0.
92; 0.
87 to 0.
98).
Questionnaires originating from universities were more likely to be returned than were questionnaires from other sources, such as commercial organisations (1.
31; 1.
11 to 1.
54).
Conclusions: Health researchers using postal questionnaires can improve the quality of their research by using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.
What is already known on this topic Postal questionnaires are widely used in the collection of data in epidemiological studies and health research Non-response to postal questionnaires reduces the effective sample size and can introduce bias What this study adds This systematic review includes more randomised controlled trials than any previously published review or meta-analysis no questionnaire response The review has identified effective ways to increase response to postal questionnaires The review will be updated regularly in the Cochrane Library.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
LA RAÍZ FOTOGRÁFICA DE LA TARJETA POSTAL
LA RAÍZ FOTOGRÁFICA DE LA TARJETA POSTAL
La tarjeta postal es un fenómeno directamente relacionado con el medio fotográfico. Las vistas monumentales, los panoramas de distintos parajes o las anécdotas más pintorescas son ...
Postal Services in the Digital Age
Postal Services in the Digital Age
In the so-called “digital age,” postal services are yet again being challenged. While they had already faced a significant challenge during the “age o...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...

Back to Top