Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Urk. Lehmann 112
View through Europeana Collections
The Knight Johann Schliederer von Lachen, his aunt (Base) Katharina, nun in
St. Lambrecht, and Elisabeth (Elchin), the widow (his grandfather?) Simunds
Guelders of Lauchen, confirm that they were at the monastery of St.
Lambrecht in the presence of the Neustadt Vitztum Konrad IX. Landschad von Steinach
and the New Town citizen Jeckel Gotzmann the contempt of Catherine
Schelkel, daughter of the Lambachter nun Christine (chandelier of laughter?), with
(her father?) Simund Schliederer on her belongings
In this context, I would like to draw attention to the fact that the European Parliament has not been able to play a decisive role. At
of this contempt were the interest payments due to the nun from the income
The Grand Badstube is not considered. Johann and his
Co-exhibitors say that the payment of 3 pounds of Heller to the aforementioned
Katharina Schelkel annually on Martin’s Day (11 November). The
The right of repurchase is determined: On St. George’s Day (April 23), whichever year
The interest payment can be replaced with 36 pounds of good Speyerer currency.
Should the nun Katharina die before a possible repurchase?
30 shillings of the manure payment to the monastery until they are replaced;
Second half of Gült decays. The repurchase sum for this case is 18
Pound Heller. In addition, exhibitors say the waiver
any further demands on the monastery, Catherine or her
current and future goods and possessions - whether real estate or driving
- for. Announcement of the seals of the exhibitor, the Neustadt Vitztum Konrad
Landschad of Steinach and the city of Neustad.Note: The results of the study are based on the
It is possible to formulate the relationships of kinship suggested by the document
with the previously known sequence of the chancers of laughter, such as Kurt
OtherMANN, The Sluggers of Lauchen. An atypical family of the Palatinate
Ritteradels, in: MHVP 108, 2010, p. 448, was proposed, not for cover.
The Especially the named widow Simunds Schliederer, Elisabeth (Elchin),
It is not satisfactory.
Heidelberg University Library
Title: Urk. Lehmann 112
Description:
The Knight Johann Schliederer von Lachen, his aunt (Base) Katharina, nun in
St.
Lambrecht, and Elisabeth (Elchin), the widow (his grandfather?) Simunds
Guelders of Lauchen, confirm that they were at the monastery of St.
Lambrecht in the presence of the Neustadt Vitztum Konrad IX.
Landschad von Steinach
and the New Town citizen Jeckel Gotzmann the contempt of Catherine
Schelkel, daughter of the Lambachter nun Christine (chandelier of laughter?), with
(her father?) Simund Schliederer on her belongings
In this context, I would like to draw attention to the fact that the European Parliament has not been able to play a decisive role.
At
of this contempt were the interest payments due to the nun from the income
The Grand Badstube is not considered.
Johann and his
Co-exhibitors say that the payment of 3 pounds of Heller to the aforementioned
Katharina Schelkel annually on Martin’s Day (11 November).
The
The right of repurchase is determined: On St.
George’s Day (April 23), whichever year
The interest payment can be replaced with 36 pounds of good Speyerer currency.
Should the nun Katharina die before a possible repurchase?
30 shillings of the manure payment to the monastery until they are replaced;
Second half of Gült decays.
The repurchase sum for this case is 18
Pound Heller.
In addition, exhibitors say the waiver
any further demands on the monastery, Catherine or her
current and future goods and possessions - whether real estate or driving
- for.
Announcement of the seals of the exhibitor, the Neustadt Vitztum Konrad
Landschad of Steinach and the city of Neustad.
Note: The results of the study are based on the
It is possible to formulate the relationships of kinship suggested by the document
with the previously known sequence of the chancers of laughter, such as Kurt
OtherMANN, The Sluggers of Lauchen.
An atypical family of the Palatinate
Ritteradels, in: MHVP 108, 2010, p.
448, was proposed, not for cover.
The Especially the named widow Simunds Schliederer, Elisabeth (Elchin),
It is not satisfactory.
Related Results
Urk. Lehmann 125
Urk. Lehmann 125
Georg von Gemmingen confirms the receipt of the payment of 121 ½ guilders from Hensel
Claus from Kandel, the Leiningian villages pledged to Georg
This article is written by Count E...
Urk. Lehmann 130
Urk. Lehmann 130
Hamann (Hans) of Sickingen certifies Count Emich VII of
Leiningen-Hardenburg the seizure of 243 guilder annual interest rates from the villages of Kandel,
Minfeld and Freckenfeld o...
Urk. Lehmann 328
Urk. Lehmann 328
Documents Lehmann 326-329 are written together.
Marquard, Abbot of Schönau, as head and pastor of Dürkheimer
Parish Church its consensus on the foundation of priestly benefices and...
John Lehmann’s War Effort: The Penguin New Writing (1940–1950)
John Lehmann’s War Effort: The Penguin New Writing (1940–1950)
John Lehmann’s The Penguin New Writing (1940-1950) is considered one of the finest literary periodicals of World War Two. The journal was committed to publishing writing about all ...
Urk. Lehmann 183
Urk. Lehmann 183
Emperor Maximilian I invites the Count Philip III of Hanau-Lichtenberg and
Brothers Christof and Hans Kussenpfenning, Marstaller Anstat Schmid, Balthasar
Wurm, Heinz Bauer, Hans Lo...
Urk. Lehmann 290
Urk. Lehmann 290
Heinrich von Leiningen, elected bishop of Speyer, the Dompropst Berthold and
The cathedral Dean Werner and the whole cathedral chapter confirm the monastery of St.
Lambrecht the tr...
CROSS MEDIA AUDIENCE OF INFORMATIONAL AGENCY “112.UA”
CROSS MEDIA AUDIENCE OF INFORMATIONAL AGENCY “112.UA”
The relevance of research is caused by the fact that cross-medіa
has become an integral feature of informational space functioning. The main feature of cross-media is based on func...

