Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Randomized, Single-Center, Superiority Trial of Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Malignant Breast Disease

View through CrossRef
Objective: Compare radioactive seed localization (RSL) and wire-guided localization (WL) for nonpalpable malignant breast disease. Background: While WL has been the most common approach for localization of nonpalpable breast tumors, other techniques such as RSL, intraoperative ultrasound, radioactive intraoperative occult lesion localization, hematoma localization, radar localization, and magnetic seed localization have been suggested as safe and efficacious alternatives. However, very few randomized controlled trials have compared these localization techniques. Methods: Between July 2015 and January 2021, 400 women with nonpalpable malignant breast disease were randomized 1:1 to RSL or WL, stratified by the surgeon and invasive disease status. The primary outcome was initial resection negative margin rates. Secondary outcomes included time efficiencies, cost, and satisfaction. Results: There was no significant difference in negative margin rates between RSL and WL [RSL 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75–0.86) vs WL 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.89); P =0.29]. RSL received better patient scores for anxiety [OR=2.62 (95% CI: 1.79–3.84); P <0.01], pain [OR=2.50 (95% CI: 1.69–3.71); P <0.01], and overall satisfaction [OR=3.24 (95% CI: 1.70–6.22); P <0.01] compared with WL. Radiologists and surgeons associated RSL with better convenience [OR=3.32 (95% CI: 1.65–6.69); P <0.01] and satisfaction of surgical procedure conduct [OR=1.67 (95% CI: 1.09–2.58); P =0.02]. Time in radiology did not differ [RSL mean (SD) 12.8±9.5 min vs. WL 11.4±6.0 min; P =0.18]. RSL incurred a $600 higher cost than WL. Conclusions: The results of the largest randomized controlled trial in the United States support RSL as an acceptable alternative to WL in the treatment of nonpalpable malignant breast disease. While RSL was not superior to WL in achievement of negative margins, patients and providers reported improved satisfaction scores.
Title: A Randomized, Single-Center, Superiority Trial of Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Malignant Breast Disease
Description:
Objective: Compare radioactive seed localization (RSL) and wire-guided localization (WL) for nonpalpable malignant breast disease.
Background: While WL has been the most common approach for localization of nonpalpable breast tumors, other techniques such as RSL, intraoperative ultrasound, radioactive intraoperative occult lesion localization, hematoma localization, radar localization, and magnetic seed localization have been suggested as safe and efficacious alternatives.
However, very few randomized controlled trials have compared these localization techniques.
Methods: Between July 2015 and January 2021, 400 women with nonpalpable malignant breast disease were randomized 1:1 to RSL or WL, stratified by the surgeon and invasive disease status.
The primary outcome was initial resection negative margin rates.
Secondary outcomes included time efficiencies, cost, and satisfaction.
Results: There was no significant difference in negative margin rates between RSL and WL [RSL 0.
80 (95% CI: 0.
75–0.
86) vs WL 0.
85 (95% CI: 0.
80–0.
89); P =0.
29].
RSL received better patient scores for anxiety [OR=2.
62 (95% CI: 1.
79–3.
84); P <0.
01], pain [OR=2.
50 (95% CI: 1.
69–3.
71); P <0.
01], and overall satisfaction [OR=3.
24 (95% CI: 1.
70–6.
22); P <0.
01] compared with WL.
Radiologists and surgeons associated RSL with better convenience [OR=3.
32 (95% CI: 1.
65–6.
69); P <0.
01] and satisfaction of surgical procedure conduct [OR=1.
67 (95% CI: 1.
09–2.
58); P =0.
02].
Time in radiology did not differ [RSL mean (SD) 12.
8±9.
5 min vs.
WL 11.
4±6.
0 min; P =0.
18].
RSL incurred a $600 higher cost than WL.
Conclusions: The results of the largest randomized controlled trial in the United States support RSL as an acceptable alternative to WL in the treatment of nonpalpable malignant breast disease.
While RSL was not superior to WL in achievement of negative margins, patients and providers reported improved satisfaction scores.

Related Results

Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Abstract Introduction Due to indeterminate cytology, Bethesda III is the most controversial category within the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. This study exam...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Malignant Hyperthermia and Gene Polymorphisms Related to Inhaled Anesthesia Drug Response
Malignant Hyperthermia and Gene Polymorphisms Related to Inhaled Anesthesia Drug Response
Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a clinical response happened to patient who is sensitive with inhaled anesthesia drug that could cause suddently death. Many previous studies showed ...

Back to Top