Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Does Composite Repair Time Affect Repair Protocol, Immediate or Delayed?

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background: Composite resin restorations frequently require repair due to fractures, marginal defects, or esthetic failures. The effectiveness of composite repair depends heavily on the surface treatment applied prior to bonding. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various surface treatment protocols on the shear bond strength(SBS) between composite resin layers in same-visit immediate repair and delayed repair conditions, using bulk-fill and nanohybrid composite resins. Methods: Two types of composite resin materials—NeoSpectra ST HV (nanohybrid) and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill—were tested. A total of ten surface treatment protocols were evaluated under both immediate and delayed repair conditions (n = 10 per subgroup). Following grinding with a diamond bur, the surfaces were treated with one of the following: phosphoric acid, universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal, Prime&Bond Universal), three application modes of Clearfil SE Bond (two-step, bond only without primer, or phosphoric acid application followed by bond only), Optibond FL without primer, or GC Modeling Liquid. Additionally, direct layering without any surface treatment was included as a control. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test were used for statistical analysis (p = 0.05). Results: Immediate repair groups showed significantly higher SBS than DR groups across both composite types. The highest SBS were observed with GC Modeling Liquid and hydrophobic bonding agents, particularly in the bulk-fill immediate repair groups. Phosphoric acid application alone, or in combination with self-etch adhesive, did not improve bond strength. Universal adhesives did not outperform hydrophobic agents in any condition. Direct layering without treatment resulted in the lowest bond strength, especially in delayed repair. Conclusions: Surface treatment protocol significantly affects the success of composite resin repair. Hydrophobic adhesives and GC Modeling Liquid proved to be the most effective options, especially for same-visit immediate repairs. Simplified approaches avoiding unnecessary etching or priming may offer clinically efficient solutions without compromising bond strength.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Does Composite Repair Time Affect Repair Protocol, Immediate or Delayed?
Description:
Abstract Background: Composite resin restorations frequently require repair due to fractures, marginal defects, or esthetic failures.
The effectiveness of composite repair depends heavily on the surface treatment applied prior to bonding.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various surface treatment protocols on the shear bond strength(SBS) between composite resin layers in same-visit immediate repair and delayed repair conditions, using bulk-fill and nanohybrid composite resins.
Methods: Two types of composite resin materials—NeoSpectra ST HV (nanohybrid) and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill—were tested.
A total of ten surface treatment protocols were evaluated under both immediate and delayed repair conditions (n = 10 per subgroup).
Following grinding with a diamond bur, the surfaces were treated with one of the following: phosphoric acid, universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal, Prime&Bond Universal), three application modes of Clearfil SE Bond (two-step, bond only without primer, or phosphoric acid application followed by bond only), Optibond FL without primer, or GC Modeling Liquid.
Additionally, direct layering without any surface treatment was included as a control.
SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope.
One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test were used for statistical analysis (p = 0.
05).
Results: Immediate repair groups showed significantly higher SBS than DR groups across both composite types.
The highest SBS were observed with GC Modeling Liquid and hydrophobic bonding agents, particularly in the bulk-fill immediate repair groups.
Phosphoric acid application alone, or in combination with self-etch adhesive, did not improve bond strength.
Universal adhesives did not outperform hydrophobic agents in any condition.
Direct layering without treatment resulted in the lowest bond strength, especially in delayed repair.
Conclusions: Surface treatment protocol significantly affects the success of composite resin repair.
Hydrophobic adhesives and GC Modeling Liquid proved to be the most effective options, especially for same-visit immediate repairs.
Simplified approaches avoiding unnecessary etching or priming may offer clinically efficient solutions without compromising bond strength.

Related Results

COMPOSITION SYMBOLS
COMPOSITION SYMBOLS
A thorough analysis of the possibilities of using existing mathematical symbols in composite geometry was carried out, and a conclusion was drawn about the need to create composite...
Composite Repair Validation and Testing: Offshore and Onshore Pipeline Correlation and Findings
Composite Repair Validation and Testing: Offshore and Onshore Pipeline Correlation and Findings
Abstract Composite wrapping has seen increased usage in both offshore and onshore production assets for the purpose of addressing faults and repairing spots on pipin...
Comparison of Outcome Between Early and Delayed Repair of Flexor Tendons
Comparison of Outcome Between Early and Delayed Repair of Flexor Tendons
Objective: To determine the association of functional outcome for flexor tendon repair for the surgery timings. Study Design: Case Series. Place and Duration of Study: Plastic and ...
Immediate vs. delayed toe-to-thumb transfer: Is the infection rate greater?
Immediate vs. delayed toe-to-thumb transfer: Is the infection rate greater?
Abstract Background After loss of a thumb, the big toe is a possible donor site for reconstruction with wrap-around free flap and trimmed-toe transfer techniques. Early r...
Interfacial Adhesion in Fibre-Polymer Composites
Interfacial Adhesion in Fibre-Polymer Composites
<p>The mechanical performance of a fibre-polymer composite is largely determined by the strength of interfacial adhesion across the fibre-polymer phase boundary. Therefore, a...
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
Background: Several methods for fixing inguinal hernias have been documented. Anterior or posterior approaches,open or laparoscopic procedures, may be used for hernia repair. While...
Modal and stress behavioral for CFRP composite lifting lug
Modal and stress behavioral for CFRP composite lifting lug
Purpose In the present study, a steel lifting lug is replaced with a composite (carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy [CFRP]) lifting lug made of a carbon/epoxy composite. The purpose of t...

Back to Top