Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Contradictions in Sustainability
View through CrossRef
Issues of environment and development are increasingly being analysed within the framework offered by sustainability and sustainable development. This article explores a number of deep-seated contradictions and tensions that exist within these concepts at least as they are currently construed. It is noted that these contradictions are often glossed over in intellectual and policy debates, but are nonetheless profound and should be made explicit.The contradictions identified and discussed in the paper are as follows:–the paradox of technology (cause or cure?);–uncertainty and decision-making (humility or arrogance in the face of ignorance?);–intergenerational and intragenerational equity (a politically impossible trade-off?);–economic growth versus ecological limits (is ‘sustainable development’ an oxymoron?);–the reconciliation of individual and collective interests, applying both to individuals in their society, and nation states in the international community;–the potential conflict between the diversity of democracy and purposeful action;–differing kinds of resilience in the face of change (resistance, marginal change, and adaptability); and–the question of whether or not optimization is anti-sustainability.In conclusion we ask what the implications of this labyrinth of contradictions are for moving towards a sustainable state. Are these contradictions too profound and thus insurmountable, or does Homo sapiens' apparently innate ability to live with contradiction and logical inconsistency offer a way out?
Title: Contradictions in Sustainability
Description:
Issues of environment and development are increasingly being analysed within the framework offered by sustainability and sustainable development.
This article explores a number of deep-seated contradictions and tensions that exist within these concepts at least as they are currently construed.
It is noted that these contradictions are often glossed over in intellectual and policy debates, but are nonetheless profound and should be made explicit.
The contradictions identified and discussed in the paper are as follows:–the paradox of technology (cause or cure?);–uncertainty and decision-making (humility or arrogance in the face of ignorance?);–intergenerational and intragenerational equity (a politically impossible trade-off?);–economic growth versus ecological limits (is ‘sustainable development’ an oxymoron?);–the reconciliation of individual and collective interests, applying both to individuals in their society, and nation states in the international community;–the potential conflict between the diversity of democracy and purposeful action;–differing kinds of resilience in the face of change (resistance, marginal change, and adaptability); and–the question of whether or not optimization is anti-sustainability.
In conclusion we ask what the implications of this labyrinth of contradictions are for moving towards a sustainable state.
Are these contradictions too profound and thus insurmountable, or does Homo sapiens' apparently innate ability to live with contradiction and logical inconsistency offer a way out?.
Related Results
correlation of human capital sustainability leadership style and resilience of the managers in airline operations group of an AIRLINE Company
correlation of human capital sustainability leadership style and resilience of the managers in airline operations group of an AIRLINE Company
This study aimed to analyze the correlation between Human Capital Sustainability Leadership style and manager resilience through a pragmatic worldview. Using explanatory sequential...
Emergent Cultural Contradictions from Overlapping Cultural Levels in Information Systems Development
Emergent Cultural Contradictions from Overlapping Cultural Levels in Information Systems Development
Research exploring the cultural influence on information system development (ISD) projects tends to focus on a single level of influence (e.g., organizational culture) or cultural ...
Editorial: New Paradigms of Sustainability in the Contemporary Era
Editorial: New Paradigms of Sustainability in the Contemporary Era
As our world grapples with the profound challenges of the 21st century, the concept of sustainability has emerged as a guiding light, illuminating the path towards a more equitable...
Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Purpose– This paper aims to, with the continuous take-up of sustainability issues by companies and with the growing experience companies gain in dealing with this topic, raise the ...
Do companies benefit from publishing sustainability-integrated reports? Evidence from the United Arab Emirates
Do companies benefit from publishing sustainability-integrated reports? Evidence from the United Arab Emirates
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to assess the extent of narrative disclosure in the sustainability-integrated reports of listed companies in the UAE and it...
The driving forces of sustainability
The driving forces of sustainability
PurposeThis paper aims to provide an integrative model for how commitment to sustainability emerges at the organizational, functional, and individual levels within organizations.De...
A TOPSIS extension framework for re-conceptualizing sustainability measurement
A TOPSIS extension framework for re-conceptualizing sustainability measurement
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to propose a sustainability measurement and scoring system for assessing the efforts of organizations at meeting sustainabili...
Introducing a sustainability assessment index metric: a simplified sustainability assessment approach
Introducing a sustainability assessment index metric: a simplified sustainability assessment approach
Abstract
Sustainability is a broad concept that drives global efforts to mitigate climate change, reduce environmental impacts, and improve societal well-being. However, ...

