Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Assessment of accessibility in virtual laboratories: a systematic review
View through CrossRef
In an era of rapid evolution in educational technologies, Virtual Labs (V-Labs) have emerged as a promising solution, fundamentally altering how learners engage with scientific concepts and experiments. Despite their potential, ensuring their effectiveness and inclusivity in terms of accessibility to diverse students remains a challenging task. Currently, there is limited insight into the accessibility of V-Labs, a gap that our study aims to address. This study seeks to ascertain the effectiveness of V-Labs in terms of accessibility and inclusivity. We synthesized empirical studies, reviewing 36 articles published between 2000 and 2023. Of these articles, 69% of the studies were conducted in higher education and covered a wide range of learning environments. Our study revealed that 47.3% of the studies focused on various engineering subjects. Our findings provide insight into V-Labs’ accessibility from four key perspectives: (a) students with limited abilities, (b) diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, (c) instructional design features and content availability, and (d) interaction supporting features. We also identified existing gaps in the accessibility of the V-Labs from the four perspectives. Furthermore, we examined the assessment methods of V-Labs, shed light on the aspects that are evaluated, and underscored the need for future work on assessment strategies.
Title: Assessment of accessibility in virtual laboratories: a systematic review
Description:
In an era of rapid evolution in educational technologies, Virtual Labs (V-Labs) have emerged as a promising solution, fundamentally altering how learners engage with scientific concepts and experiments.
Despite their potential, ensuring their effectiveness and inclusivity in terms of accessibility to diverse students remains a challenging task.
Currently, there is limited insight into the accessibility of V-Labs, a gap that our study aims to address.
This study seeks to ascertain the effectiveness of V-Labs in terms of accessibility and inclusivity.
We synthesized empirical studies, reviewing 36 articles published between 2000 and 2023.
Of these articles, 69% of the studies were conducted in higher education and covered a wide range of learning environments.
Our study revealed that 47.
3% of the studies focused on various engineering subjects.
Our findings provide insight into V-Labs’ accessibility from four key perspectives: (a) students with limited abilities, (b) diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, (c) instructional design features and content availability, and (d) interaction supporting features.
We also identified existing gaps in the accessibility of the V-Labs from the four perspectives.
Furthermore, we examined the assessment methods of V-Labs, shed light on the aspects that are evaluated, and underscored the need for future work on assessment strategies.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
EFEKTIFITAS PELATIHAN LABORATORIUM VIRTUAL SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN BAGI GURU KIMIA
EFEKTIFITAS PELATIHAN LABORATORIUM VIRTUAL SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN BAGI GURU KIMIA
EFFECTIVITY OF VIRTUAL LABORATORY TRAINING AS A LEARNING MEDIA FOR CHEMISTRY TEACHERSAchmad Lutfi, SukarminUniversitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia achmadlutfi@unesa.ac.idAbstractThe...
Understanding Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Understanding Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review
<p>Engineering education has gained significant importance in the 21st century due to its integration of essential technological literacy needed in our rapidly changing world...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract
The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Are virtual physiology laboratories effective for student learning? A systematic review
Are virtual physiology laboratories effective for student learning? A systematic review
It is unclear if the transition from traditional, in-person physiology laboratories to virtual alternatives has educational impacts on students. This study used a systematic review...
Universal Design for Virtual Worlds
Universal Design for Virtual Worlds
We describe three broad approaches to the issue of accessibility design within Virtual Worlds. Our intent is to stimulate the thinking of content designers within Virtual Worlds a...
RELEVANCE OF USING VIRTUAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION
RELEVANCE OF USING VIRTUAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION
This article discusses the relevance of using virtual technologies, namely virtual reality (VR) technologies and virtual laboratories, and identifies scientists who have conducted ...

