Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

THE GENIUS BEHIND GUIDELINES

View through CrossRef
Medical guidelines are documents containing recommendations which can be used in clinical practice. They are intended to help physicians make informed decisions on diagnostic or treatment dilemmas and help achieve the best outcomes for patients. Medical guidelines are not made overnight. Members of the guidelines development committee, composed of a multidisciplinary panel of experts from key groups, are carefully chosen to produce a high qualityscientificdocument. Thisisachievedthrough atransparent,evidence-baseddecision-makingprocess that is labor intensive and rigorous. This ensures that guidelines are sound, credible and at par with international standards. The process starts by defining the topic and scope for guideline development. Key issues and questions regarding the topic are drafted. Review of questions, literature search, evidence reviews, and committee discussions are done. Available medical evidence are summarized, and grading of evidence is made, until a draft recommendation is developed. Draft guidelines are then reviewed by stakeholders until a final guideline is produced and published. In this special issue, we bring you outputs from this guideline development process - four relevant documents on COVID-19, Pediatric Community Acquired Pneumonia (in collaboration with the Philippine Academy of Pediatric Pulmonologists), Leptospirosis, and Pediatric Immunization (prepared by the National Institutes of Health-Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and funded by the Department of Health ). The guideline development process is imperfect. Some shortcomings include paucity of evidence on certain questions, presence of potential conflicts of interest among members of the committee, limitations in funding, and even time. The major advantage is access to a summarized wealth of evidence on a specific topic to enhance physician expertise, improve healthcare quality, and reduce healthcare cost. Guidelines can also influence health policies so that underrecognized health concerns and services can be made available to the majority. Guidelines should be used with the best interest of the individual patient in mind. They help to improve patient care quality. The complex medical decision making process done by the physician however, should not be limited by simplistic algorithms suggested by guidelines.
Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines
Title: THE GENIUS BEHIND GUIDELINES
Description:
Medical guidelines are documents containing recommendations which can be used in clinical practice.
They are intended to help physicians make informed decisions on diagnostic or treatment dilemmas and help achieve the best outcomes for patients.
Medical guidelines are not made overnight.
Members of the guidelines development committee, composed of a multidisciplinary panel of experts from key groups, are carefully chosen to produce a high qualityscientificdocument.
Thisisachievedthrough atransparent,evidence-baseddecision-makingprocess that is labor intensive and rigorous.
This ensures that guidelines are sound, credible and at par with international standards.
The process starts by defining the topic and scope for guideline development.
Key issues and questions regarding the topic are drafted.
Review of questions, literature search, evidence reviews, and committee discussions are done.
Available medical evidence are summarized, and grading of evidence is made, until a draft recommendation is developed.
Draft guidelines are then reviewed by stakeholders until a final guideline is produced and published.
In this special issue, we bring you outputs from this guideline development process - four relevant documents on COVID-19, Pediatric Community Acquired Pneumonia (in collaboration with the Philippine Academy of Pediatric Pulmonologists), Leptospirosis, and Pediatric Immunization (prepared by the National Institutes of Health-Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and funded by the Department of Health ).
The guideline development process is imperfect.
Some shortcomings include paucity of evidence on certain questions, presence of potential conflicts of interest among members of the committee, limitations in funding, and even time.
The major advantage is access to a summarized wealth of evidence on a specific topic to enhance physician expertise, improve healthcare quality, and reduce healthcare cost.
Guidelines can also influence health policies so that underrecognized health concerns and services can be made available to the majority.
Guidelines should be used with the best interest of the individual patient in mind.
They help to improve patient care quality.
The complex medical decision making process done by the physician however, should not be limited by simplistic algorithms suggested by guidelines.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Genius Obscured
Genius Obscured
This chapter considers how a link was established between genius and genius in a manner that sidelines the public. It explores arguments which claims that the public—now deemed “vu...
Genius in France
Genius in France
This book spans three centuries to provide the first full account of the long and diverse history of genius in France. Exploring a wide range of examples from literature, philosoph...
Victor Hugo, William Shakespeare, and the Dynasty of Genius
Victor Hugo, William Shakespeare, and the Dynasty of Genius
This chapter turns to Victor Hugo's discussions of genius. In taking Shakespeare as his pretext for discussing genius, and setting him alongside the likes of Homer, Aeschylus, Job,...
A Novel of Female Genius
A Novel of Female Genius
This chapter considers the links between women and genius in the figure of Mme De Staël's Corinne (from her 1807 of the same name). At the time of its publication women there seeme...
Quality of Evidence-Based Pediatric Guidelines
Quality of Evidence-Based Pediatric Guidelines
Objective. To identify evidence-based pediatric guidelines and to assess their quality.Methods. We searched Medline, Embase, and relevant Web sites of guideline development program...
Fictional Shakespeares and Portraits of Genius
Fictional Shakespeares and Portraits of Genius
This study is the first to investigate how cultural interpretations of "genius" influence, and are reflected in, fictional portraits of Shakespeare. It explores the wide range of p...
Individual versus Collective Genius
Individual versus Collective Genius
This chapter discusses some views on individual and collective genius. Chateaubriand and Mme de Staël each construct a view of collective genius that relates to individual genius i...

Back to Top