Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Safavid Army

View through CrossRef
Ruling from 1501 through 1722, the Safavid dynasty unified the eastern and western halves of the Iranian plateau and imposed Twelver Shiʿism on the population. The interpretation of the Safavid Empire as a revival of an Iranian imperial tradition dating back to the Achaemenids is not credible, but the dynasty did create the framework in which modern Iran developed. By creating a large Shiʿi polity and politicizing the Sunni-Shiʿi split, the Safavids established an essential part of the framework of the modern Middle East. Safavid military history had three phases. From the beginning of the polity in 1501 until the Ottoman Sultan Selim (r. 1512–1520) defeated the founder of the Safavid polity, Shah Ismaʿil I (r. 1501–1524) at Chaldiran in 1514, the Safavid army was a tribal army. The Turkmen tribes (uymaq) that followed the Safavid rulers were known as the Qizilbash (red heads) after their distinctive red head gear. The Safavid Empire differed little from the earlier tribal Turkic and Mongol tribal confederations that had dominated much of the Middle East since the 11th century. In the second phase, from 1514 through the reign of Shah ʿAbbas I (r. 1588–1629) the Safavid military system evolved from an army of tribal cavalry to a composite force with cavalry recruited through several different mechanisms, and artillery and infantry components. The transformation gave the Safavids an army capable of defeating the Uzbeks and Mughals and, under conditions of advantage, the Ottomans. From the death of ʿAbbas I until the collapse of the empire in 1722, the third phase, the military organization did not change, but lost vitality and capacity. In 1648, the Safavids could project enough power to take Qandahar from the Mughals; in 1722, they could not defend their own capital from an Afghan army without siege equipment. The military transformation during the second phase paralleled and depended upon a transformation from a decentralized polity in which the Qizilbash dominated the provinces to a more centralized regime that depended primarily on silk exports. The Ghilzai Afghans, who ruled what had been the Safavid Empire from 1722 through 1729, and Nadir Shah Afshar, who ruled from 1729 to 1747, took over the Safavid governmental institutions. Some historians regard Nadir Shah as one of the great commanders of history. This bibliography includes generally accessible works in English, French, and German, on the assumption that its users will be mostly Western military historians, not scholars of Iranian history. It does not, therefore, include primary sources, either in Persian or in other languages. Most of the works listed, especially the Encyclopaedia Iranica articles, contain excellent bibliographic information. The citations themselves reproduce the transliteration in the works cited. Otherwise, this bibliography employs a simplified version of the transliteration system employed in the International Journal of Middle East Studies without diacritical marks except the reverse apostrophe for the letter ع (ayn, pronounced as a glottal stop in Persian). Because there is no standard method of transliterating languages written in the Arabic script into the Latin script, readers must expect some variations.
Oxford University Press
Title: Safavid Army
Description:
Ruling from 1501 through 1722, the Safavid dynasty unified the eastern and western halves of the Iranian plateau and imposed Twelver Shiʿism on the population.
The interpretation of the Safavid Empire as a revival of an Iranian imperial tradition dating back to the Achaemenids is not credible, but the dynasty did create the framework in which modern Iran developed.
By creating a large Shiʿi polity and politicizing the Sunni-Shiʿi split, the Safavids established an essential part of the framework of the modern Middle East.
Safavid military history had three phases.
From the beginning of the polity in 1501 until the Ottoman Sultan Selim (r.
1512–1520) defeated the founder of the Safavid polity, Shah Ismaʿil I (r.
1501–1524) at Chaldiran in 1514, the Safavid army was a tribal army.
The Turkmen tribes (uymaq) that followed the Safavid rulers were known as the Qizilbash (red heads) after their distinctive red head gear.
The Safavid Empire differed little from the earlier tribal Turkic and Mongol tribal confederations that had dominated much of the Middle East since the 11th century.
In the second phase, from 1514 through the reign of Shah ʿAbbas I (r.
1588–1629) the Safavid military system evolved from an army of tribal cavalry to a composite force with cavalry recruited through several different mechanisms, and artillery and infantry components.
The transformation gave the Safavids an army capable of defeating the Uzbeks and Mughals and, under conditions of advantage, the Ottomans.
From the death of ʿAbbas I until the collapse of the empire in 1722, the third phase, the military organization did not change, but lost vitality and capacity.
In 1648, the Safavids could project enough power to take Qandahar from the Mughals; in 1722, they could not defend their own capital from an Afghan army without siege equipment.
The military transformation during the second phase paralleled and depended upon a transformation from a decentralized polity in which the Qizilbash dominated the provinces to a more centralized regime that depended primarily on silk exports.
The Ghilzai Afghans, who ruled what had been the Safavid Empire from 1722 through 1729, and Nadir Shah Afshar, who ruled from 1729 to 1747, took over the Safavid governmental institutions.
Some historians regard Nadir Shah as one of the great commanders of history.
This bibliography includes generally accessible works in English, French, and German, on the assumption that its users will be mostly Western military historians, not scholars of Iranian history.
It does not, therefore, include primary sources, either in Persian or in other languages.
Most of the works listed, especially the Encyclopaedia Iranica articles, contain excellent bibliographic information.
The citations themselves reproduce the transliteration in the works cited.
Otherwise, this bibliography employs a simplified version of the transliteration system employed in the International Journal of Middle East Studies without diacritical marks except the reverse apostrophe for the letter ع (ayn, pronounced as a glottal stop in Persian).
Because there is no standard method of transliterating languages written in the Arabic script into the Latin script, readers must expect some variations.

Related Results

Perilaku Konsumtif Menonton Konser Agust D Tour ‘D-Day In Jakarta’
Perilaku Konsumtif Menonton Konser Agust D Tour ‘D-Day In Jakarta’
Abstract. K-Pop idols or artists often carry out world tours or music concerts which of course can be attended by tens of thousands of fans. As is the case in Indonesia, a number o...
John Bruce, Jr. : a Sixty-Nine Year Leadership Journey Throughout Change in the United States Army
John Bruce, Jr. : a Sixty-Nine Year Leadership Journey Throughout Change in the United States Army
Problem and Purpose The U.S. Army has changed radically in the 68 years since World War II ended, from uniforms to vehicles, from weaponry to organizational changes. While still t...
Jacques-Antoine-Hippolyte, comte de Guibert: Father of the Grande Armée
Jacques-Antoine-Hippolyte, comte de Guibert: Father of the Grande Armée
The eighteenth century was a time of intense upheaval in France. The death of Louis XIV in 1715 and the subsequent reign of Louis XV saw the end of French political and martial heg...
Study of White and Blue Pottery in the Safavid Period
Study of White and Blue Pottery in the Safavid Period
Art and the craft of pottery have always held a significant place in addressing human needs. Throughout different eras and societies, we have witnessed the growth, development, and...
The Volume of Iranian Raw Silk Exports in the Safavid Period
The Volume of Iranian Raw Silk Exports in the Safavid Period
Pre-nineteenth century Iranian history is short on numbers, or at least on reliable ones. Lack of quantitative data is perhaps the greatest obstacle confronting historians of pre-m...
Victorian Warfare, 1837–1902
Victorian Warfare, 1837–1902
Following the victory over Napoleon at Waterloo in 1815, British global supremacy went effectively unchallenged for a century. Between 1815 and 1914, Great Britain was engaged in o...
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — Human Rights Act 19...
The Founding of the Army League
The Founding of the Army League
Abstract Wilhelmine Germans, one might argue, took their army for granted. To some extent, this was to be expected given the army’s historic role as the nation’s fir...

Back to Top