Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluating behavioral intervention technologies: Integrating human-centered design and implementation science outcomes

View through CrossRef
Background Behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) offer scalable, cost-effective healthcare solutions but often show reduced impacts in community settings and are rarely sustained. Human-centered design (HCD) enhances usability by tailoring BITs to stakeholder needs, while implementation science (IS) identifies contextual barriers and strategies to promote uptake and sustainability. Both HCD and IS aim to improve BIT usability and implementation through iterative, user-focused processes but are rarely integrated. Objective We introduced the user-centered and sustainable implementation science (USIS) model, a novel and systematic framework that combines HCD and IS principles to enhance BIT effectiveness and sustainability. We aimed to (1) synthesize the HCD and IS outcomes and integrate them into a USIS framework; (2) apply USIS to a case study: the sleep shared-management intervention for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their parents (SLEEPSMART). Methods We conducted a narrative literature review on HCD and IS outcomes for BITs from the PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. Articles were selected based on their focus on usability, implementation outcomes, and evidence-based healthcare practices. This synthesis informed the development of the USIS model. Results The USIS model incorporates five domains: (1) user-centeredness (empathy, engagement, and equity), (2) efficiency (cost, timeliness, and rapidity), (3) feasibility (learnability, memorability, error reduction, and low cognitive load), (4) satisfaction (acceptability and appropriateness), and (5) fidelity (adoption, penetration, and sustainability). We applied the USIS model to evaluate the SLEEPSMART project to demonstrate the application of the USIS model in guiding BIT design and refinement. Insights from the review informed the design principles applied during the development and testing stages of SLEEPSMART. Conclusion The USIS model serves as a practical and theoretical guide to improve BIT design and evaluation. By emphasizing implementation considerations early and centering user needs, USIS provides a pathway to bridge HCD and IS approaches to enhance the real-world impact and sustainability of digital health innovations.
Title: Evaluating behavioral intervention technologies: Integrating human-centered design and implementation science outcomes
Description:
Background Behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) offer scalable, cost-effective healthcare solutions but often show reduced impacts in community settings and are rarely sustained.
Human-centered design (HCD) enhances usability by tailoring BITs to stakeholder needs, while implementation science (IS) identifies contextual barriers and strategies to promote uptake and sustainability.
Both HCD and IS aim to improve BIT usability and implementation through iterative, user-focused processes but are rarely integrated.
Objective We introduced the user-centered and sustainable implementation science (USIS) model, a novel and systematic framework that combines HCD and IS principles to enhance BIT effectiveness and sustainability.
We aimed to (1) synthesize the HCD and IS outcomes and integrate them into a USIS framework; (2) apply USIS to a case study: the sleep shared-management intervention for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their parents (SLEEPSMART).
Methods We conducted a narrative literature review on HCD and IS outcomes for BITs from the PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases.
Articles were selected based on their focus on usability, implementation outcomes, and evidence-based healthcare practices.
This synthesis informed the development of the USIS model.
Results The USIS model incorporates five domains: (1) user-centeredness (empathy, engagement, and equity), (2) efficiency (cost, timeliness, and rapidity), (3) feasibility (learnability, memorability, error reduction, and low cognitive load), (4) satisfaction (acceptability and appropriateness), and (5) fidelity (adoption, penetration, and sustainability).
We applied the USIS model to evaluate the SLEEPSMART project to demonstrate the application of the USIS model in guiding BIT design and refinement.
Insights from the review informed the design principles applied during the development and testing stages of SLEEPSMART.
Conclusion The USIS model serves as a practical and theoretical guide to improve BIT design and evaluation.
By emphasizing implementation considerations early and centering user needs, USIS provides a pathway to bridge HCD and IS approaches to enhance the real-world impact and sustainability of digital health innovations.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Design
Design
Conventional definitions of design rarely capture its reach into our everyday lives. The Design Council, for example, estimates that more than 2.5 million people use design-related...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Speech, communication, and neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease : characterisation and intervention outcomes
Speech, communication, and neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease : characterisation and intervention outcomes
<p dir="ltr">Most individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience changes in speech, voice or communication. Speech changes often manifest as hypokinetic dysarthria, a m...
Speech, communication, and neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease : characterisation and intervention outcomes
Speech, communication, and neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease : characterisation and intervention outcomes
<p dir="ltr">Most individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience changes in speech, voice or communication. Speech changes often manifest as hypokinetic dysarthria, a m...
Speech, communication, and neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease : Characterisation and intervention outcomes
Speech, communication, and neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease : Characterisation and intervention outcomes
<p dir="ltr">Most individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience changes in speech, voice or communication. Speech changes often manifest as hypokinetic dysarthria, a m...

Back to Top