Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Apologizing for Socrates
View through CrossRef
Apologizing for Socrates examines some of Plato's and Xenophon's Socratic writings, specifically those that address well-known controversiese concerning the life and death of Socrates. Gabriel Danzig argues that the effort to defend Socrates from a variety of contemporary charges helps explain some of the central philosophical arguments and literary features that appear in these works. Concentrating on the two Apologies, Crito, Euthyphro, Xenophon's Symposium and Memorabilia, Lysis, and Oeconommicus, Danzig argues that the apologetic efforts were essential for rebuilding the community of Socratic friends and companions, which was devastated by the trial and death of Socrates. The Socratic writings are not merely literary or philosophical endeavors, but also political acts of great competence.
Title: Apologizing for Socrates
Description:
Apologizing for Socrates examines some of Plato's and Xenophon's Socratic writings, specifically those that address well-known controversiese concerning the life and death of Socrates.
Gabriel Danzig argues that the effort to defend Socrates from a variety of contemporary charges helps explain some of the central philosophical arguments and literary features that appear in these works.
Concentrating on the two Apologies, Crito, Euthyphro, Xenophon's Symposium and Memorabilia, Lysis, and Oeconommicus, Danzig argues that the apologetic efforts were essential for rebuilding the community of Socratic friends and companions, which was devastated by the trial and death of Socrates.
The Socratic writings are not merely literary or philosophical endeavors, but also political acts of great competence.
Related Results
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
In just over a decade, interest in Xenophon'sSymposiumhas risen dramatically. No longer the poor relation to its author's more popular Socratic works or to Plato's dialogue of the ...
Virtue in the Cave
Virtue in the Cave
Abstract
Offers an interpretation of Plato's Meno that seeks to illuminate the particularly “therapeutic” philosophy that Socrates practices. It argues that the Meno...
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to
Plato who...
Socrates (469–399 BCE)
Socrates (469–399 BCE)
Abstract
We know little about Socrates, who so changed the course of philosophy that those who preceded him are called Presocratics. Tradition tells us one way Socrates d...
Sokrates og oss: Et essay om Sokrates’ forsvarstale, tekstfortolkning og filosofihistorie
Sokrates og oss: Et essay om Sokrates’ forsvarstale, tekstfortolkning og filosofihistorie
<p><em>Socrates and Us: An Essay on the </em>Apology of Socrates<em>, Philological Interpretations and History of Philosophy. </em>I start out with a ...
Introduction: Speech Bonds
Introduction: Speech Bonds
Jill Frank introduces Berger’s argument by addressing the ethicalities of Plato’s proposed Klinopolis—his “Couch City”—whether it promises to be the good city, the bad city, or per...
Before and after Socrates
Before and after Socrates
In this book, F.M. Cornford explains why the life and work of Socrates stand out as marking a turning-point in the history of thought. He shows how Socrates revolutionized the conc...
Impasse, Paradox, and the Myth of Learning by Recollection
Impasse, Paradox, and the Myth of Learning by Recollection
AbstractHaving failed to produce a satisfactory definition of virtue, Meno suddenly recalls having heard that Socrates is a perplexed man himself who causes perplexity in others. H...

