Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Hydrological Signature Representation of 7533 KGE Calibrated Conceptual Model Structures
View through CrossRef
Discussions calling for more rigorous evaluation practices for hydrologic models have recently increased. In addition to the widely used integral objective functions, hydrologic signatures are becoming common evaluation metrics for proving the suitability of hydrologic models for specific application purposes.This work calibrates 7488 fixed conceptual model structures using KGE as an objective function. These structures range from a 1 to 3 storage model space previously used for an automatic model structure identification experiment. In this experiment we simultaneously calibrated the model structure (number of stores and flux equations) and its parameter values. Additionally, we calibrated 45 literature-based model structures (MARRMoT Toolbox) to extend the structural diversity in the analyzed models. We select well-performing models based on their KGE value (as is common practice) and analyze their performance using 12 selected hydrological runoff signatures. These signatures represent five aspects of the hydrological regime (magnitude, frequency, duration, rate of change, and timing). The large number of model structures, calibrated to the streamflow of 12 MOPEX catchments, allows general insight into how well common conceptual model structures can represent observed hydrological behavior evaluated by signatures.Results show a general behavior of model structures calibrated to KGE to perform well in representing runoff ratio, mean discharge, the 95th streamflow percentile, and the mean half-flow date. However, the analyzed conceptual model structures struggle to represent low flow and frequency signatures. When evaluated only for KGE, we can identify dominating model structures over all catchments. When evaluated for signatures, there are no model preferences over all analyzed catchments but different models seem to have their merits under specific conditions. These results support the need for ensuring model adequacy for a given task.
Title: Hydrological Signature Representation of 7533 KGE Calibrated Conceptual Model Structures
Description:
Discussions calling for more rigorous evaluation practices for hydrologic models have recently increased.
In addition to the widely used integral objective functions, hydrologic signatures are becoming common evaluation metrics for proving the suitability of hydrologic models for specific application purposes.
This work calibrates 7488 fixed conceptual model structures using KGE as an objective function.
These structures range from a 1 to 3 storage model space previously used for an automatic model structure identification experiment.
In this experiment we simultaneously calibrated the model structure (number of stores and flux equations) and its parameter values.
Additionally, we calibrated 45 literature-based model structures (MARRMoT Toolbox) to extend the structural diversity in the analyzed models.
We select well-performing models based on their KGE value (as is common practice) and analyze their performance using 12 selected hydrological runoff signatures.
These signatures represent five aspects of the hydrological regime (magnitude, frequency, duration, rate of change, and timing).
The large number of model structures, calibrated to the streamflow of 12 MOPEX catchments, allows general insight into how well common conceptual model structures can represent observed hydrological behavior evaluated by signatures.
Results show a general behavior of model structures calibrated to KGE to perform well in representing runoff ratio, mean discharge, the 95th streamflow percentile, and the mean half-flow date.
However, the analyzed conceptual model structures struggle to represent low flow and frequency signatures.
When evaluated only for KGE, we can identify dominating model structures over all catchments.
When evaluated for signatures, there are no model preferences over all analyzed catchments but different models seem to have their merits under specific conditions.
These results support the need for ensuring model adequacy for a given task.
Related Results
Increased life expectancy of heart failure patients in a rural center by a multidisciplinary program
Increased life expectancy of heart failure patients in a rural center by a multidisciplinary program
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
INTRODUCTION Patients with heart failure (HF)...
Testing the Adequacy of 7533 KGE Calibrated Conceptual Model Structures
Testing the Adequacy of 7533 KGE Calibrated Conceptual Model Structures
Discussions calling for more rigorous evaluation practices for hydrologic models have recently increased. In addition to the widely used aggregated objective functions, hydrologic ...
Evaluating the hydrological utility of four gridded precipitation datasets for streamflow prediction in a mountainous basin
Evaluating the hydrological utility of four gridded precipitation datasets for streamflow prediction in a mountainous basin
<p>Precipitation with high spatio-temporal resolution is one of the critical components of meteorological forcing for hydrological modeling. Its accurate measurement ...
Multiple techniques for calibration and validation of SWAT model in an ungauged catchment in Inner Himalayan Ranges.
Multiple techniques for calibration and validation of SWAT model in an ungauged catchment in Inner Himalayan Ranges.
<p>Reliability of hydrological model simulation plays an important role in better understanding of hydrological processes, eco-hydrologic and eco-hydraulic condition ...
Evaluation of the performance of hydrological model LISFLOOD using the ECMWF seasonal meteorological forecast at 1arcmin-1day spatiotemporal resolution over German catchments
Evaluation of the performance of hydrological model LISFLOOD using the ECMWF seasonal meteorological forecast at 1arcmin-1day spatiotemporal resolution over German catchments
Floods and their devastating effects on society and economy have increased dramatically in Germany, and Europe in recent years. At the end of 2023, rivers and streams across German...
Technical note: Pitfalls in using log-transformed flows within the KGE criterion
Technical note: Pitfalls in using log-transformed flows within the KGE criterion
Abstract. Log-transformed discharge is often used to calculate performance criteria to
better focus on low flows. This prior transformation limits the
heteroscedasticity of model r...
Technical note: Pitfalls in using log-transformed flows within the
KGE criterion
Technical note: Pitfalls in using log-transformed flows within the
KGE criterion
Abstract. Log-transformed discharge is often used to calculate performance criteria to better focus on low flows. This prior transformation limits the heteroscedasticity of model r...
Hydrological model adaptivity to inputs of varied quality 
Hydrological model adaptivity to inputs of varied quality 
<p>Hydrological models serve as useful tools to describe current conditions and to predict future conditions in a catchment. However, the errors from input data inclu...

