Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Net Neutrality
View through CrossRef
Net neutrality is defined as the policy that requires Internet service providers (ISPs) to give access to all digital content according to availability, not personal or organizational preference, priority, or relationship. ISPs cannot discriminate based on a favorable relationship, organizational pressure, or financial incentive. In short, every website or digital application is treated the same by the ISP and may not be blocked or slowed down intentionally. An ISP like Comcast, an organization that provides Internet access to millions of households around the world, cannot slow down access to popular streaming website Netflix to give its own streaming website a competitive advantage. This is because net neutrality is a legal principle that changes over time based on the ruling authority of government. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for regulating issues of digital policy and access. While net neutrality was the legal principle until 2017 in the United States, changes in FCC leadership as appointed by President Trump overturned net neutrality and eliminated it. Globally, net neutrality is an inconsistent policy in both its design and enforcement. India has one of the strongest sets of net neutrality policies in the world and has strong enforcement measures that heavily penalize ISPs that are found to violate it. The European Union similarly has net neutrality policies, but these are inconsistently enforced throughout its member countries. Australia also has strong net neutrality policies, but critics warn that these policies are rarely enforced. Alternatively, countries like China do not enforce net neutrality at all. Enforcement is often tied to how it is constructed politically. As a policy, net neutrality is a political issue that cultivates pro- and anti-activist groups. The policy is frequently tied to issues of free speech, in that when an ISP discriminates against a specific website, it is simultaneously discriminating against that website’s text/speech. Pro-net neutrality activists argue that net neutrality is foundational to free speech online. Alternatively, anti-net neutrality activists argue that the policy is a cover for government interfering with the economic growth of digital organizations. These discrepancies dramatically impact how technology companies conduct business and public access to digital content.
Title: Net Neutrality
Description:
Net neutrality is defined as the policy that requires Internet service providers (ISPs) to give access to all digital content according to availability, not personal or organizational preference, priority, or relationship.
ISPs cannot discriminate based on a favorable relationship, organizational pressure, or financial incentive.
In short, every website or digital application is treated the same by the ISP and may not be blocked or slowed down intentionally.
An ISP like Comcast, an organization that provides Internet access to millions of households around the world, cannot slow down access to popular streaming website Netflix to give its own streaming website a competitive advantage.
This is because net neutrality is a legal principle that changes over time based on the ruling authority of government.
In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for regulating issues of digital policy and access.
While net neutrality was the legal principle until 2017 in the United States, changes in FCC leadership as appointed by President Trump overturned net neutrality and eliminated it.
Globally, net neutrality is an inconsistent policy in both its design and enforcement.
India has one of the strongest sets of net neutrality policies in the world and has strong enforcement measures that heavily penalize ISPs that are found to violate it.
The European Union similarly has net neutrality policies, but these are inconsistently enforced throughout its member countries.
Australia also has strong net neutrality policies, but critics warn that these policies are rarely enforced.
Alternatively, countries like China do not enforce net neutrality at all.
Enforcement is often tied to how it is constructed politically.
As a policy, net neutrality is a political issue that cultivates pro- and anti-activist groups.
The policy is frequently tied to issues of free speech, in that when an ISP discriminates against a specific website, it is simultaneously discriminating against that website’s text/speech.
Pro-net neutrality activists argue that net neutrality is foundational to free speech online.
Alternatively, anti-net neutrality activists argue that the policy is a cover for government interfering with the economic growth of digital organizations.
These discrepancies dramatically impact how technology companies conduct business and public access to digital content.
Related Results
Net neutrality and the value chain for video
Net neutrality and the value chain for video
PurposeVideo distribution over the internet leads to heated net‐neutrality related debates between network operators and over‐the‐top application providers. The purpose of this pap...
What is Neutrality
What is Neutrality
This paper reinvestigates the question of liberal neutrality. We contend that current liberal discussions have been dominated – if not hijacked – by one particular interpretation o...
The Politics and Diplomacy of Neutrality
The Politics and Diplomacy of Neutrality
This article discusses the diplomacy and foreign policy of neutral actors in international relations. It introduces popular research themes of neutrality studies and presents some ...
A Comparative Study of Pyrenophora Teres Drechs. F. Teres and Pyrenophora Teres Drechs. F. Maculata Smedeg. Cause of "Net" and "Spot" Type Net Blotch Respectively on New Zealand Barley
A Comparative Study of Pyrenophora Teres Drechs. F. Teres and Pyrenophora Teres Drechs. F. Maculata Smedeg. Cause of "Net" and "Spot" Type Net Blotch Respectively on New Zealand Barley
<p>Net blotch is caused by Pyrenophora teres Drechs. (stat. conid. Drechslera teres (Sacc.) Shoem., syn. Helminthosporium teres Sacc). P. teres produces symptoms which appear...
Svensk sjöfart, neutralitet och det väpnade neutralitetsförbundet 1780–1783
Svensk sjöfart, neutralitet och det väpnade neutralitetsförbundet 1780–1783
Swedish Shipping, Neutrality, and the First League of Armed Neutrality,1780–1783.The purpose of this article is to follow two contradictory perceptions of neutrality in the politic...
Analysis of the Motivations for the Introduction of Mongolia’s Permanent Neutrality Policy
Analysis of the Motivations for the Introduction of Mongolia’s Permanent Neutrality Policy
Following the introduction of the “multi-pillar” diplomatic strategy and the “third neighbor” policy, in September 2015, Mongolia officially launched a permanent neutrality policy....
Would John Stuart Mill Support or Reject Net Neutrality?
Would John Stuart Mill Support or Reject Net Neutrality?
In this article, the philosophy of John Stuart Mill is applied to the notion of net neutrality. It is argued that Mill would support net neutrality, provided it does not come in co...
Impact of Nurse Staffing Mandates on Safety‐Net Hospitals: Lessons from California
Impact of Nurse Staffing Mandates on Safety‐Net Hospitals: Lessons from California
Context: California is the first and only state to implement a patient‐to‐nurse ratio mandate for hospitals. Increasing nurse staffing is an important organizational intervention f...

