Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Purchases dominate the carbon footprint of research laboratories
View through CrossRef
AbstractDespite increasing interest for the carbon footprint of higher education institutions, little is known about the carbon footprint associated to research activities. Air travel and attendance to conferences concentrate recent data and debates but purchases have attracted little attention. Here we develop a hybrid method to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) associated to research purchases. To do so, we combine macroe-conomic databases, research-centered companies footprints and life-cycle assesments to construct a public database of monetary emission factors (EF) for research purchases. We apply it to estimate the purchases emissions of a hundred of research laboratories in France, belonging to the Labos 1point5 network and gathering more than 20000 staff, from all disciplines. We find that purchases dominate laboratory emissions, accounting for more than 50% of emissions, with a median of 2.7 t CO2e/pers, which is 3 to 4-fold the separate contribution from travel, commutes and heating. Median electricity emissions are 5-fold lower in our dataset of laboratories using low carbon electricity but they become preponderant for high carbon electricity mixes (3.5 t CO2e/pers). Purchases emissions are very heterogeneous among laboratories and are linearly correlated with budget, with an average carbon intensity of 0.31±0.07 kg CO2e/€ and differences between research domains. Finally, we quantify the effect of a series of demand-driven mitigation strategies obtaining up to−20 % in total emissions (−40 % in purchases emissions), suggesting that effectively reducing the carbon footprint of research activities calls for systemic changes.Significance statementResearch activities are recently interrogating their contribution to global warming, mainly through the impact of air travel but neglecting the emissions embodied in scientific purchases. However, goods and services used in a research laboratory emit greenhouse gases when they are produced. Here we construct a public and robust database of emission factors to quantify purchases emissions in a laboratory and we use it to assess emissions from a hundred of laboratories in France, from all disciplines. We find that purchases emissions represent half of the of the 6.3 t CO2e/pers per year emitted on average per laboratory. Emissions, however, vary greatly between laboratories and disciplines and an analysis of mitigation strategies shows that decreasing demand may significantly reduce purchases emissions.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Title: Purchases dominate the carbon footprint of research laboratories
Description:
AbstractDespite increasing interest for the carbon footprint of higher education institutions, little is known about the carbon footprint associated to research activities.
Air travel and attendance to conferences concentrate recent data and debates but purchases have attracted little attention.
Here we develop a hybrid method to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) associated to research purchases.
To do so, we combine macroe-conomic databases, research-centered companies footprints and life-cycle assesments to construct a public database of monetary emission factors (EF) for research purchases.
We apply it to estimate the purchases emissions of a hundred of research laboratories in France, belonging to the Labos 1point5 network and gathering more than 20000 staff, from all disciplines.
We find that purchases dominate laboratory emissions, accounting for more than 50% of emissions, with a median of 2.
7 t CO2e/pers, which is 3 to 4-fold the separate contribution from travel, commutes and heating.
Median electricity emissions are 5-fold lower in our dataset of laboratories using low carbon electricity but they become preponderant for high carbon electricity mixes (3.
5 t CO2e/pers).
Purchases emissions are very heterogeneous among laboratories and are linearly correlated with budget, with an average carbon intensity of 0.
31±0.
07 kg CO2e/€ and differences between research domains.
Finally, we quantify the effect of a series of demand-driven mitigation strategies obtaining up to−20 % in total emissions (−40 % in purchases emissions), suggesting that effectively reducing the carbon footprint of research activities calls for systemic changes.
Significance statementResearch activities are recently interrogating their contribution to global warming, mainly through the impact of air travel but neglecting the emissions embodied in scientific purchases.
However, goods and services used in a research laboratory emit greenhouse gases when they are produced.
Here we construct a public and robust database of emission factors to quantify purchases emissions in a laboratory and we use it to assess emissions from a hundred of laboratories in France, from all disciplines.
We find that purchases emissions represent half of the of the 6.
3 t CO2e/pers per year emitted on average per laboratory.
Emissions, however, vary greatly between laboratories and disciplines and an analysis of mitigation strategies shows that decreasing demand may significantly reduce purchases emissions.
Related Results
Introducing a new national tool to monitor the carbon footprint of inhalers
Introducing a new national tool to monitor the carbon footprint of inhalers
Abstract
Introduction
The Welsh Government launched its National Health Service (NHS) Wales decarbonisation strategic delivery p...
The carbon footprint cost of travel to Canadian Urological Association conferences
The carbon footprint cost of travel to Canadian Urological Association conferences
Introduction: Canadian Urological Association (CUA) conferences are held annually across Canada. Guests from across the world attended, contributing to the overall carbon footprint...
Questions and Answers in the Negative Footprint Illusion Paradigm: A Reply to Gorissen et al. (2024)
Questions and Answers in the Negative Footprint Illusion Paradigm: A Reply to Gorissen et al. (2024)
When asked to estimate the carbon footprint of a bundle of relatively low carbon footprint items and relatively high carbon footprint items, people typically report a lower value c...
Carbon footprint of Russia: realities and prospects of economic development
Carbon footprint of Russia: realities and prospects of economic development
The article deals with the key aspects of the problem of determining the “carbon footprint” of industrial production. Rapidly increasing greenhouse gas emission within the past two...
Stochastic convergence of ecological footprint: new insights from a unit root test based on smooth transitions and nonlinear adjustment
Stochastic convergence of ecological footprint: new insights from a unit root test based on smooth transitions and nonlinear adjustment
AbstractThe ecological footprint has currently become a highly popular environmental performance indicator. It provides the basis for setting goals, identifying options for action,...
Ecological Footprint and Water Footprint of Taipei
Ecological Footprint and Water Footprint of Taipei
Taiwan suffers from many natural disasters and is vulnerable to climate change. A continuous increase in its ecological footprint (EF) would pose numerous threats to the city. Taip...
Does Globalization Trigger an Ecological Footprint? A Time Series Analysis of Bangladesh
Does Globalization Trigger an Ecological Footprint? A Time Series Analysis of Bangladesh
Climate change has become a pitfall towards economic growth, sustainable development, and ecological balance, not different in Bangladesh. This study investigates the relationship ...
Carbon export in the land-to-ocean aquatic continuum (LOAC) of China
Carbon export in the land-to-ocean aquatic continuum (LOAC) of China
It has long been recognized that terrestrial ecosystems are not isolated from other earth systems with all the absorbed carbon being permanently sequestered on land. Inland water s...

