Javascript must be enabled to continue!
On Microaggressions: Cumulative Harm and Individual Responsibility
View through CrossRef
Microaggressions are a new moral category that refers to the subtle yet harmful forms of discriminatory behavior experienced by members of oppressed groups. Such behavior often results from implicit bias, leaving individual perpetrators unaware of the harm they have caused. Moreover, microaggressions are often dismissed on the grounds that they do not constitute a real or morally significant harm. My goal is therefore to explain why microaggressions are morally significant and argue that we are responsible for their harms. I offer a conceptual framework for microaggressions, exploring the central mechanisms used for identification and the empirical research concerning their harm. The cumulative harm of microaggressions presents a unique case for understanding disaggregation models for contributed harms, blame allocation, and individual responsibility within structural oppression. Our standard moral model for addressing cumulative harm is to hold all individual contributors blameworthy for their particular contributions. However, if we aim to hold people responsible for their unconscious microaggressions and address cumulative harm holistically, this model is inadequate. Drawing on Iris Marion Young's social connection model, I argue that we, as individual perpetrators of microaggressions, have a responsibility to respond to the cumulative harm to which we have individually contributed.
Title: On Microaggressions: Cumulative Harm and Individual Responsibility
Description:
Microaggressions are a new moral category that refers to the subtle yet harmful forms of discriminatory behavior experienced by members of oppressed groups.
Such behavior often results from implicit bias, leaving individual perpetrators unaware of the harm they have caused.
Moreover, microaggressions are often dismissed on the grounds that they do not constitute a real or morally significant harm.
My goal is therefore to explain why microaggressions are morally significant and argue that we are responsible for their harms.
I offer a conceptual framework for microaggressions, exploring the central mechanisms used for identification and the empirical research concerning their harm.
The cumulative harm of microaggressions presents a unique case for understanding disaggregation models for contributed harms, blame allocation, and individual responsibility within structural oppression.
Our standard moral model for addressing cumulative harm is to hold all individual contributors blameworthy for their particular contributions.
However, if we aim to hold people responsible for their unconscious microaggressions and address cumulative harm holistically, this model is inadequate.
Drawing on Iris Marion Young's social connection model, I argue that we, as individual perpetrators of microaggressions, have a responsibility to respond to the cumulative harm to which we have individually contributed.
Related Results
Racial Microaggressions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review
Racial Microaggressions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review
AimsRacial microaggressions occur when subtle or often automatic exchanges of aversive and covert racism are directed towards people identifying as racialized groups. Consequently,...
Microaggressions Reconsidered
Microaggressions Reconsidered
Abstract
In response to the problems of an act-based account of microaggressions discussed in Chapter 2, Chapter 3 advances a revised account: the harm-based account...
Rethinking microaggressions and anti-social behaviour against LGBTIQ+ youth
Rethinking microaggressions and anti-social behaviour against LGBTIQ+ youth
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to further the understanding of experiences of anti-social behaviour in LGBTIQ+ youth in university settings.
Design/methodology/approach
The...
Microaggressions
Microaggressions
Abstract
This chapter provides a history of microaggressions. The term was coined in 1970 by a Black Harvard psychologist, Chester Pierce, to describe the “subtle bl...
After Pierce and Sue: A Revised Racial Microaggressions Taxonomy
After Pierce and Sue: A Revised Racial Microaggressions Taxonomy
Harvard psychiatrist Chester Pierce’s conception of “subtle and stunning” daily racial offenses, or microaggressions, remains salient even 50 years after it was introduced. Microag...
Women’s Educating and Coping Strategies for Cultivating Supportive Web-Based Spaces for Discussing Sexual and Reproductive Health: Co-Design Study (Preprint)
Women’s Educating and Coping Strategies for Cultivating Supportive Web-Based Spaces for Discussing Sexual and Reproductive Health: Co-Design Study (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Stigma surrounding women’s sexual and reproductive health (SRH) often prevents them from seeking essential care. In South Korea, unmarried women ...
Emotional Microaggressions
Emotional Microaggressions
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview and analysis of emotional microaggressions. In medical contexts, emotional microaggressions occur when healthcare professi...
Epistemic Microaggressions
Epistemic Microaggressions
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview and analysis of epistemic microaggressions. In medical contexts, epistemic microaggressions are intentional or unintention...

