Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Demonstrating the value of evidence syntheses to inform funding organisations’ decision-making practices
View through CrossRef
The session aims to showcase the value of evidence syntheses in improving the practices of research funding organisations. Funders are facing growing demands to demonstrate impact, accountability and transparency in their practices. Evidence syntheses are comprehensive reviews that gather and analyse data from multiple studies on a specific topic, deepening our understanding and uncovering new insights. Driven by robust and rigorous evidence, evidence syntheses are essential mechanisms for implementing positive changes to research practices by providing funders, researchers, and institutions with the evidence needed to make well-informed decisions on policy and practice, noting that some may not have been extensively explored before.This session will draw on six evidence syntheses, covering diverse areas of interest to funders (e.g., realist review, scoping reviews). Using a case study approach, we will invite discussion on the value of using different types of evidence synthesis for different purposes and how the findings have relevance to stakeholders to inform decision-making. We hope that attendees will leave the session with a better understanding of the value of evidence syntheses to inform and enhance research practices. Six evidence syntheses that will be presented:
* [Peer review and decision-making in research funding](https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-022-00120-2)
* [Post-award effort of managing and reporting on funded research](https://f1000research.com/articles/12-863)
* [Potential benefits and challenges of AI for research funding organisations](https://f1000research.com/articles/14-126)
* [Use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care research](https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291627)
* [Methods and approaches for evidencing research impact](https://ror-hub.org/study/3296/)
* [What constitutes a good research culture?](https://f1000research.com/articles/13-324)
Cassyni
Title: Demonstrating the value of evidence syntheses to inform funding organisations’ decision-making practices
Description:
The session aims to showcase the value of evidence syntheses in improving the practices of research funding organisations.
Funders are facing growing demands to demonstrate impact, accountability and transparency in their practices.
Evidence syntheses are comprehensive reviews that gather and analyse data from multiple studies on a specific topic, deepening our understanding and uncovering new insights.
Driven by robust and rigorous evidence, evidence syntheses are essential mechanisms for implementing positive changes to research practices by providing funders, researchers, and institutions with the evidence needed to make well-informed decisions on policy and practice, noting that some may not have been extensively explored before.
This session will draw on six evidence syntheses, covering diverse areas of interest to funders (e.
g.
, realist review, scoping reviews).
Using a case study approach, we will invite discussion on the value of using different types of evidence synthesis for different purposes and how the findings have relevance to stakeholders to inform decision-making.
We hope that attendees will leave the session with a better understanding of the value of evidence syntheses to inform and enhance research practices.
Six evidence syntheses that will be presented:
* [Peer review and decision-making in research funding](https://researchintegrityjournal.
biomedcentral.
com/articles/10.
1186/s41073-022-00120-2)
* [Post-award effort of managing and reporting on funded research](https://f1000research.
com/articles/12-863)
* [Potential benefits and challenges of AI for research funding organisations](https://f1000research.
com/articles/14-126)
* [Use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care research](https://journals.
plos.
org/plosone/article?id=10.
1371/journal.
pone.
0291627)
* [Methods and approaches for evidencing research impact](https://ror-hub.
org/study/3296/)
* [What constitutes a good research culture?](https://f1000research.
com/articles/13-324).
Related Results
Outcomes of Transplant-Eligible Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts Registered in a Prospective Observational Study: The JALSG-CS11-MDS-SCT
Outcomes of Transplant-Eligible Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts Registered in a Prospective Observational Study: The JALSG-CS11-MDS-SCT
Abstract
Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Several studie...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Comparison of Conventional Xrays with CT Based Approaches for Detection of Lytic Lesions in Multiple Myeloma
Comparison of Conventional Xrays with CT Based Approaches for Detection of Lytic Lesions in Multiple Myeloma
Background: Lytic bone lesions are one of the most common clinical characteristics of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and identification of bone lesions help distinguish betwee...
Phase 2 Study of Tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059), a Second-Generation Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Monotherapy in Patients with Treatment-Naïve or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Phase 2 Study of Tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059), a Second-Generation Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Monotherapy in Patients with Treatment-Naïve or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
BACKGROUND
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma in which bone marrow is infiltrated by immunoglobulin M (IgM)-producing clonal lymphopl...
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
The National Cultural Policy Discussion Paper—drafted to assist the Australian Government in developing the first national Cultural Policy since Creative Nation nearly two decades ...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Randomized Study of Digital Life Coaching during Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
Randomized Study of Digital Life Coaching during Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) entails sudden life changes including acute symptom burden, changes in phy...
Trial in Progress: Phase I Open-Label Study of Metformin and Nelfinavir in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Trial in Progress: Phase I Open-Label Study of Metformin and Nelfinavir in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Abstract
Background:
GLUT4 inhibition is an attractive therapeutic option in multiple myeloma (MM) given the dependence of MM cells on glucose transpo...

