Javascript must be enabled to continue!
SU‐DD‐A4‐01: Multi‐Day Multi‐Modality Image Co‐Registration
View through CrossRef
Purpose: To develop a methodology for multi‐day co‐registration of multi‐modality images taken throughout the course of radiotherapy, for the assessment of tumor response to treatment. Method and Materials: CT and PET image data sets of canines with various tumors were taken on a PET/CT scanner and were automatically co‐registered to each other by the scanner software. Using a commercial software package, ROI segmentation was performed on the CT data to define the tumor boundaries. Each PET data set was then masked by the ROI of its aligned CT image and then rigidly co‐registered with the masked PET data from other days. To align more specific uptake regions within the tumor, image warping was performed via landmarks placed on the co‐registered multi‐day PET data. Results: We found that ROIs can be roughly aligned by rigid registration of the outer tumor region as defined by the segmentation of CT data. Histogram correlation plots, aided by visual assessment, illustrated that normalized mutual information and Euclidean distance were the best‐suited criteria for rigid registration, and that increased accuracy in co‐registration was gained from image warping via landmarks placed on specific structures within the day‐to‐day rigidly co‐registered PET data. A review of warping techniques on the co‐registered PET data and generated data phantoms demonstrated that thin‐plate spline warping provided the most complete warping of landmarked structures, while flow warping was not as aggressive with non‐landmarked structures. Conclusion: Using this methodology of rigid registration of tumor boundaries defined from CT data, followed by inner feature warping of PET data proves to be an accurate and usable way to perform multi‐day multi‐modality image co‐registration. Further investigations include additional contouring of segmented regions, adding scaling parameters to the initial registrations, and refining landmark placement and warping techniques.
Title: SU‐DD‐A4‐01: Multi‐Day Multi‐Modality Image Co‐Registration
Description:
Purpose: To develop a methodology for multi‐day co‐registration of multi‐modality images taken throughout the course of radiotherapy, for the assessment of tumor response to treatment.
Method and Materials: CT and PET image data sets of canines with various tumors were taken on a PET/CT scanner and were automatically co‐registered to each other by the scanner software.
Using a commercial software package, ROI segmentation was performed on the CT data to define the tumor boundaries.
Each PET data set was then masked by the ROI of its aligned CT image and then rigidly co‐registered with the masked PET data from other days.
To align more specific uptake regions within the tumor, image warping was performed via landmarks placed on the co‐registered multi‐day PET data.
Results: We found that ROIs can be roughly aligned by rigid registration of the outer tumor region as defined by the segmentation of CT data.
Histogram correlation plots, aided by visual assessment, illustrated that normalized mutual information and Euclidean distance were the best‐suited criteria for rigid registration, and that increased accuracy in co‐registration was gained from image warping via landmarks placed on specific structures within the day‐to‐day rigidly co‐registered PET data.
A review of warping techniques on the co‐registered PET data and generated data phantoms demonstrated that thin‐plate spline warping provided the most complete warping of landmarked structures, while flow warping was not as aggressive with non‐landmarked structures.
Conclusion: Using this methodology of rigid registration of tumor boundaries defined from CT data, followed by inner feature warping of PET data proves to be an accurate and usable way to perform multi‐day multi‐modality image co‐registration.
Further investigations include additional contouring of segmented regions, adding scaling parameters to the initial registrations, and refining landmark placement and warping techniques.
Related Results
Verification of image registration for the commercial treatmetn planning systems
Verification of image registration for the commercial treatmetn planning systems
Image registration is essential in treatment planning and position verification for highly radiation conformal delivery methods. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accura...
Relational Inference with Specific-Shared Features for Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification
Relational Inference with Specific-Shared Features for Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification
Visible–infrared person re-identification (VI-ReID) aims to match pedestrians across heterogeneous visible and infrared modalities. Existing methods predominantly focus on learning...
High-performance image registration algorithms for multi-core processors
High-performance image registration algorithms for multi-core processors
Deformable registration consists of aligning two or more 3D images into a common coordinate frame. Fusing multiple images in this fashion quantifies changes in organ shape, size, a...
Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications: a Cross-Sectional Study of German Trials
Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications: a Cross-Sectional Study of German Trials
Objective: Prospective registration has been widely implemented and accepted as a best practice in clinical research, but retrospective registration is still commonly found. We ass...
Public Procedures for State Registration
Public Procedures for State Registration
The paper reviews the types of state registration carried out to meet private and public needs, as well as the content of the relevant administrative procedures. The author substan...
Prospective Registration of Trials: Where we are, why, and how we could get better
Prospective Registration of Trials: Where we are, why, and how we could get better
Objectives: Transparent trial conduct requires prospective registration of a randomized controlled trial before the enrolment of the first participant. Registration aims to minimiz...
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
<p dir="ltr">Neurosurgery involves significant risks due to the intricate anatomy and delicate structures of the brain and spine. Developing techniques to improve surgical ac...
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
<p dir="ltr">Neurosurgery involves significant risks due to the intricate anatomy and delicate structures of the brain and spine. Developing techniques to improve surgical ac...

