Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Destroyer of the Law II
View through CrossRef
This chapter shows how Christ destroyed the Law from Marcion’s (reconstructed) gospel (the Evangelion). After discussing the Marcionite reading of Luke 23:2 (Jewish leaders accuse Jesus of “destroying the Law”), the discussion focuses on Christ’s concrete violations of the Law. First, Jesus touched lepers in violation of the Law and healed them apart from the Law’s purification rites. Further, he allowed himself to be touched by an unclean woman but did not consider himself to be unclean. Moreover, he controverted the Law to honor parents by requiring a would-be disciple not to bury his father, and in general by requiring his disciples to abandon their families. Christ stated that the Law lasted until John the Baptist (Luke 16:16), indicating its abolition. Finally, Christ violated Sabbath laws numerous times, even claiming to be lord of—or over—the Sabbath. This Jesus who attacked the Law then died by the Law’s penalties. This was proof not only that Christ opposed the Law but that the Law was hostile to Christ. Yet the Law was only the instrument of the Lawgiver who plotted Christ’s death and so proved his evil nature.
Title: Destroyer of the Law II
Description:
This chapter shows how Christ destroyed the Law from Marcion’s (reconstructed) gospel (the Evangelion).
After discussing the Marcionite reading of Luke 23:2 (Jewish leaders accuse Jesus of “destroying the Law”), the discussion focuses on Christ’s concrete violations of the Law.
First, Jesus touched lepers in violation of the Law and healed them apart from the Law’s purification rites.
Further, he allowed himself to be touched by an unclean woman but did not consider himself to be unclean.
Moreover, he controverted the Law to honor parents by requiring a would-be disciple not to bury his father, and in general by requiring his disciples to abandon their families.
Christ stated that the Law lasted until John the Baptist (Luke 16:16), indicating its abolition.
Finally, Christ violated Sabbath laws numerous times, even claiming to be lord of—or over—the Sabbath.
This Jesus who attacked the Law then died by the Law’s penalties.
This was proof not only that Christ opposed the Law but that the Law was hostile to Christ.
Yet the Law was only the instrument of the Lawgiver who plotted Christ’s death and so proved his evil nature.
Related Results
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Sculptor and Destroyer
Sculptor and Destroyer
The fascinating story of glutamate, the neurotransmitter that controls the structure and function of the brain in health and neurological disorders.
Sculptor and Des...
An International Rule of Law
An International Rule of Law
The “international rule of law” is an elusive concept. Under this heading, mainly two variations are being discussed: The international rule of law “proper” and an “internationaliz...
PERAN PENTING HUKUM ISLAM DALAM PERATURAN HUKUM INDONESIA
PERAN PENTING HUKUM ISLAM DALAM PERATURAN HUKUM INDONESIA
Islamic law is a topic of conversation among both practitioners and academics. Not only in His laws but also in the procedures for establishing and implementing laws using Islamic ...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...

