Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Reservoir Management of the Hartzog Draw Field

View through CrossRef
Summary The Hartzog Draw field is a recently discovered major oil reservoir in northeastern Wyoming. Initial reservoir performance indicated that the field soon would be depleted below the bubble-point pressure. To evaluate secondary recovery possibilities, the working interest owners, cooperated in an extensive reservoir study. Although there were some unique problems. both in evaluating reservoir data and in obtaining a unitization agreement, this effort led to the formation of the Hartzog Draw Unit within 5 years of field discovery. Secondary recovery by waterflooding has begun, and enhanced recovery possibilities are being evaluated. Introduction The Hartzog Draw field, discovered in 1975, is in the Powder River basin of northeastern Wyoming, (Fig. 1). There are 177 wells in the field, producing on 160-acre (647 x 10 3-M2) spacing from the Shannon sand at 9,400 ft (2865 m). Initial oil in place (IOIP) was 350 MMSTB (55.6x 10 6 stock-tank M 3). As the field was developed, pressure measurements revealed that reservoir pressure was dropping rapidly from the initial value of 5,000 psig (34.5 MPa). Reservoir fluid analysis indicated that the oil was an undersaturated black oil with a bubble point of 1,550 psig (10.7 MPa). Pressure reduction significantly below the bubble point would lower ultimate recovery if the field eventually were waterflooded. Prudent reservoir management required that the field be unitized. An operators committee was formed, and under the direction of various subcommittees an extensive reservoir analysis was conducted. This included geological correlation and mapping, reservoir fluid and rock analysis, pressure transient testing, and relative permeability tests. Reservoir simulation studies were conducted to predict remaining primary recovery and secondary recovery for various proposed methods. These efforts resulted in a recommendation to the working interest owners to unitize and begin secondary recovery immediately by waterflooding. The field was unitized in mid-1980, and waterflood facilities currently are being installed. A study of enhanced recovery possibilities by CO, injection is being conducted also. The objectives of this paper are (1) to present the geology. performance history, and reservoir properties of the Hartzog Draw field, (2) to describe the unitization process, and (3) to discuss the current status of field development and plans for enhanced recovery. Field Geology The Hartzog Draw field is a northwest-to-southeast trending, stratigraphically trapped hydrocarbon reservoir. The field is approximately 22 miles (35.4 km) long and from 1 to 4 miles (1.6 to 6.4 km) wide. Oil and gas production is from the Shannon sandstone member of the Cody shale of Upper Cretaceous age. The reservoir sands range from less than 5 ft (1.5 m) to more than 60 ft (18.3 m) thick (Fig. 2), and lie within a 20- to 90-ft (6- to 27-m) sequence of inter-bedded sand, silt, and shale. The Hartzog Draw discovery well is shown in Fig. 3 as a type log for the field. It is believed that the Shannon sand of Hartzog Draw was deposited in an offshore marine shelf setting. The sand originally was spread over the shelf as a blanket deposit. The reservoir was formed by southward-flowing marine currents, which reworked and redistributed the sand in an elongate bar-type deposit. These marine currents varied in strength and energy, as indicated by the sedimentary structures, which range from ripples to large scale trough cross-beds within the reservoir. The grain size of the sand ranges from fine to medium, with an average clay content of about 20%. JPT P. 1575^
Title: Reservoir Management of the Hartzog Draw Field
Description:
Summary The Hartzog Draw field is a recently discovered major oil reservoir in northeastern Wyoming.
Initial reservoir performance indicated that the field soon would be depleted below the bubble-point pressure.
To evaluate secondary recovery possibilities, the working interest owners, cooperated in an extensive reservoir study.
Although there were some unique problems.
both in evaluating reservoir data and in obtaining a unitization agreement, this effort led to the formation of the Hartzog Draw Unit within 5 years of field discovery.
Secondary recovery by waterflooding has begun, and enhanced recovery possibilities are being evaluated.
Introduction The Hartzog Draw field, discovered in 1975, is in the Powder River basin of northeastern Wyoming, (Fig.
1).
There are 177 wells in the field, producing on 160-acre (647 x 10 3-M2) spacing from the Shannon sand at 9,400 ft (2865 m).
Initial oil in place (IOIP) was 350 MMSTB (55.
6x 10 6 stock-tank M 3).
As the field was developed, pressure measurements revealed that reservoir pressure was dropping rapidly from the initial value of 5,000 psig (34.
5 MPa).
Reservoir fluid analysis indicated that the oil was an undersaturated black oil with a bubble point of 1,550 psig (10.
7 MPa).
Pressure reduction significantly below the bubble point would lower ultimate recovery if the field eventually were waterflooded.
Prudent reservoir management required that the field be unitized.
An operators committee was formed, and under the direction of various subcommittees an extensive reservoir analysis was conducted.
This included geological correlation and mapping, reservoir fluid and rock analysis, pressure transient testing, and relative permeability tests.
Reservoir simulation studies were conducted to predict remaining primary recovery and secondary recovery for various proposed methods.
These efforts resulted in a recommendation to the working interest owners to unitize and begin secondary recovery immediately by waterflooding.
The field was unitized in mid-1980, and waterflood facilities currently are being installed.
A study of enhanced recovery possibilities by CO, injection is being conducted also.
The objectives of this paper are (1) to present the geology.
performance history, and reservoir properties of the Hartzog Draw field, (2) to describe the unitization process, and (3) to discuss the current status of field development and plans for enhanced recovery.
Field Geology The Hartzog Draw field is a northwest-to-southeast trending, stratigraphically trapped hydrocarbon reservoir.
The field is approximately 22 miles (35.
4 km) long and from 1 to 4 miles (1.
6 to 6.
4 km) wide.
Oil and gas production is from the Shannon sandstone member of the Cody shale of Upper Cretaceous age.
The reservoir sands range from less than 5 ft (1.
5 m) to more than 60 ft (18.
3 m) thick (Fig.
2), and lie within a 20- to 90-ft (6- to 27-m) sequence of inter-bedded sand, silt, and shale.
The Hartzog Draw discovery well is shown in Fig.
3 as a type log for the field.
It is believed that the Shannon sand of Hartzog Draw was deposited in an offshore marine shelf setting.
The sand originally was spread over the shelf as a blanket deposit.
The reservoir was formed by southward-flowing marine currents, which reworked and redistributed the sand in an elongate bar-type deposit.
These marine currents varied in strength and energy, as indicated by the sedimentary structures, which range from ripples to large scale trough cross-beds within the reservoir.
The grain size of the sand ranges from fine to medium, with an average clay content of about 20%.
JPT P.
1575^.

Related Results

Improved Reservoir Fluid Estimation for Prospect Evaluation Using Mud Gas Data
Improved Reservoir Fluid Estimation for Prospect Evaluation Using Mud Gas Data
Abstract Reservoir fluid estimation for exploration prospects can be random and of large uncertainties. Typically, the reservoir fluid estimation in a prospect can b...
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Abstract 1 Int...
Predicting Reservoir Fluid Properties from Advanced Mud Gas Data
Predicting Reservoir Fluid Properties from Advanced Mud Gas Data
SummaryIn a recent paper, we published a machine learning method to quantitatively predict reservoir fluid gas/oil ratio (GOR) from advanced mud gas (AMG) data. The significant inc...
Dynamic Characterization of Different Reservoir Stacked Patterns for a Giant Carbonate Reservoir in Middle East
Dynamic Characterization of Different Reservoir Stacked Patterns for a Giant Carbonate Reservoir in Middle East
Abstract Understanding reservoir stacked styles is critical for a successful water injection in a carbonate reservoir. Especially for the giant carbonate reservoirs,...
Reservoir Management Practices
Reservoir Management Practices
Summary This paper describes the reservoir management practices used at fieldsdeveloped and operated by Esso Production Malaysia Inc. (EPMI). The goal of EPMI's r...
Dynamic Characterization of Different Reservoir Types for a Fractured-Caved Carbonate Reservoir
Dynamic Characterization of Different Reservoir Types for a Fractured-Caved Carbonate Reservoir
Abstract Understanding reservoir types or reservoir patterns is critical for a successful development strategy decision in carbonate reservoirs. For the fractured-ca...

Back to Top