Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Why was Pavel Negrebetskii Executed?

View through CrossRef
The paper seeks to contribute to the discussion among historians about the value, as historical sources, of foreign diplomats stationed in Russia. Two young men, Hildebrand von Horn, an envoy extraordinaire of the Danish king, and the Swede Johan Gabriel Sparwenfeld, a student of the Russian language and Russian affairs on a scholarship granted by the Swedish king, met in the Russian capital during the summer of 1684. They had met before—in1682 inCopenhagen—but this time their roles were quite different, as they were in Moscow as representatives of countries with opposite political aims vis-à-vis Russia. Von Horn was inRussiafor the third time, knew many influential people at court and mastered the Russian language. He kept Sparwenfeld informed about what was going on behind the scenes at court. This information was written down by Sparwenfeld in his diary of the Russian journey, published by the author of this paper in 2002. In July 1684 von Horn told Sparwenfeld about the execution of “a noble and learned Pole, Negrebetskii”. This person, Pavel Negrebetskii, had had an important position at court during the reign of Fyodor Alekseevich but lost his influence after the death of the Tsar. In August the two friends once more discussed Negrebetskii, his torture, and the role of I. M. Miloslavskii in his fate. Negrebetskii was accused of having taken part in a conspiracy against Sof’ia and her supporters in the aftermath of the streltsy uprising in May 1682. The torture was stopped by Vasilii Vasil’evich Golitsyn, and Negrebetskii was hastily and secretly taken to theRed Squareand executed. Why was Negrebetskii executed in this way two years after his stated crime? After discussing various aspects of the question, this paper gives a possible answer. It seems that the real reason was that Negrebetskii did not stop trying to make the Polish king intervene on Naryshkina’s side in the struggle for power between the Miloslavskii and Naryshkin clans. In connection with the arrival of an Austrian embassy in Moscow in May–June1684, anew possibility for Negrebetskii to get in contact with Poland offered itself in the person of the Habsburg resident in Warsaw, I. Zierowsky. Negrebetskii, it seems, took advantage of the opportunity and tried to send a letter with Zierowsky to the Polish king, begging the king for help and support of Naryshkina and her son. The letter was intercepted, and Sof’ia and Miloslavskii decided to get rid of the irritating Pole once and for all. His execution also gave a clear signal to Peter’s supporters that their previous plans were known and that their activities were under surveillance. It was not possible to touch the main actors in the unrealized conspiracy for political reasons; the most active among them was Vasilii Vasil’evich’s cousin, Boris Alekseevich Golitsyn. So, the entries in Sparwenfeld´s diary about nightly conversations between two foreigners in the Russian capital help to shed light on how and when Pavel Negrebetskii died, and, hopefully, also why.
Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Title: Why was Pavel Negrebetskii Executed?
Description:
The paper seeks to contribute to the discussion among historians about the value, as historical sources, of foreign diplomats stationed in Russia.
Two young men, Hildebrand von Horn, an envoy extraordinaire of the Danish king, and the Swede Johan Gabriel Sparwenfeld, a student of the Russian language and Russian affairs on a scholarship granted by the Swedish king, met in the Russian capital during the summer of 1684.
They had met before—in1682 inCopenhagen—but this time their roles were quite different, as they were in Moscow as representatives of countries with opposite political aims vis-à-vis Russia.
Von Horn was inRussiafor the third time, knew many influential people at court and mastered the Russian language.
He kept Sparwenfeld informed about what was going on behind the scenes at court.
This information was written down by Sparwenfeld in his diary of the Russian journey, published by the author of this paper in 2002.
In July 1684 von Horn told Sparwenfeld about the execution of “a noble and learned Pole, Negrebetskii”.
This person, Pavel Negrebetskii, had had an important position at court during the reign of Fyodor Alekseevich but lost his influence after the death of the Tsar.
In August the two friends once more discussed Negrebetskii, his torture, and the role of I.
M.
Miloslavskii in his fate.
Negrebetskii was accused of having taken part in a conspiracy against Sof’ia and her supporters in the aftermath of the streltsy uprising in May 1682.
The torture was stopped by Vasilii Vasil’evich Golitsyn, and Negrebetskii was hastily and secretly taken to theRed Squareand executed.
Why was Negrebetskii executed in this way two years after his stated crime? After discussing various aspects of the question, this paper gives a possible answer.
It seems that the real reason was that Negrebetskii did not stop trying to make the Polish king intervene on Naryshkina’s side in the struggle for power between the Miloslavskii and Naryshkin clans.
In connection with the arrival of an Austrian embassy in Moscow in May–June1684, anew possibility for Negrebetskii to get in contact with Poland offered itself in the person of the Habsburg resident in Warsaw, I.
Zierowsky.
Negrebetskii, it seems, took advantage of the opportunity and tried to send a letter with Zierowsky to the Polish king, begging the king for help and support of Naryshkina and her son.
The letter was intercepted, and Sof’ia and Miloslavskii decided to get rid of the irritating Pole once and for all.
His execution also gave a clear signal to Peter’s supporters that their previous plans were known and that their activities were under surveillance.
It was not possible to touch the main actors in the unrealized conspiracy for political reasons; the most active among them was Vasilii Vasil’evich’s cousin, Boris Alekseevich Golitsyn.
So, the entries in Sparwenfeld´s diary about nightly conversations between two foreigners in the Russian capital help to shed light on how and when Pavel Negrebetskii died, and, hopefully, also why.

Related Results

Pavle je Pavel, a ni bil Savel, tudi ni Peter in Pavel ne Peter ali Pavel ne pavliha
Pavle je Pavel, a ni bil Savel, tudi ni Peter in Pavel ne Peter ali Pavel ne pavliha
članku, posvečenem Pavletu Merkuju, avtor obravnava besedje in frazeologijo, povezano z imenom Pavel. V naslovu članka pa bolj retorično odgovorja na vprašanje, ali rek Nomen est o...
Pavel Florensky and the Future of Thought
Pavel Florensky and the Future of Thought
The article examines the legacy of priest Pavel Florensky in the context of European culture from antiquity to the present day. The dialogue in which Florensky is a perceiving and ...
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
TheMulti-Purpose Detector (MPD) is one of the three experiments of the Nuclotron Ion Collider-fAcility (NICA) complex, which is currently under construction at the Joint Institute ...
Arguments against ‘The Executed Renaissance’
Arguments against ‘The Executed Renaissance’
SummaryThis article attempts to critically analyze ‘The Executed Renaissance’ anthology edited by Iurii Lavrinenko and its impact on the formation of the post-war historical and li...
Roodkrijttekeningen naar schilderijen van Adriaen van de Venne en hun mogelijke functie
Roodkrijttekeningen naar schilderijen van Adriaen van de Venne en hun mogelijke functie
AbstractThis article presents for the first time fifteen red chalk drawings by Adriaen Pietersz. van de Venne (I589-I662) as a cohesive group (catalogue in appendix i). Not only do...
Runahead threads
Runahead threads
Los temas de investigación sobre multithreading han ganado mucho interés en la arquitectura de computadores con la aparición de procesadores multihilo y multinucleo. Los procesador...
Warszawska konspiracja więzienna 1939-1944 (udział polskiego personelu)
Warszawska konspiracja więzienna 1939-1944 (udział polskiego personelu)
Taken over by the Nazi in September 1939, Polish prisons became not only the gallows of many thousands of Poles but also the site of heroic struggle against the invaders ‒ a strugg...

Back to Top