Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for HER2-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer across subgroups: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Background:
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has introduced innovative therapeutic paradigms for the management of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). However, the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC remain contentious. The comparability among different subgroups is not fully understood, necessitating the identification of optimal patient demographics and the exploration of potential biomarkers.
Methods:
This study identified 6 Phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating the first-line treatment of HER2-negative GC/GEJC with PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy. The primary endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), assessed using hazard ratios (HR), relative risk, and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes are treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events. Prespecified subgroups encompass microsatellite instability, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), age, gender, previous surgery, primary location, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, histological subtype, chemotherapy regimen, race, and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells.
Results:
Incorporating data from 6 randomized controlled trials, this analysis included 6294 adult patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC. The combined PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy regimen significantly improved OS (
HR
= 0.79, 95% CI [0.75, 0.84],
P
< .00001) and PFS (
HR
= 0.75, 95% CI [0.70, 0.80],
P
< .00001), along with enhancing the ORR (relative risk = 1.22, 95% CI [1.15, 1.29],
P
< .00001). Subgroup analyses revealed benefits in OS, PFS, and ORR for patients with CPS ≥ 1, CPS ≥ 5, and CPS ≥ 10 when treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy, with higher PD-L1 expression levels correlating with greater efficacy. Furthermore, patients with high microsatellite instability exhibited a more pronounced extension in OS (
HR
= 0.35, 95% CI [0.21, 0.59],
P
< .0001). However, factors such as age, gender, previous surgery, primary location, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, histological subtype, chemotherapy regimen, race, and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells were not predictive of an OS benefit from PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Regarding safety, the PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy combination led to a higher incidence of immune-mediated adverse events, though there was no significant difference in adverse events leading to death.
Conclusion:
First-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy surpasses chemotherapy alone in efficacy for patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC, particularly in those with CPS ≥ 10 or high microsatellite instability, with tolerable adverse events.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for HER2-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer across subgroups: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Background:
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has introduced innovative therapeutic paradigms for the management of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).
However, the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC remain contentious.
The comparability among different subgroups is not fully understood, necessitating the identification of optimal patient demographics and the exploration of potential biomarkers.
Methods:
This study identified 6 Phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating the first-line treatment of HER2-negative GC/GEJC with PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy.
The primary endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), assessed using hazard ratios (HR), relative risk, and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Secondary outcomes are treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events.
Prespecified subgroups encompass microsatellite instability, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), age, gender, previous surgery, primary location, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, histological subtype, chemotherapy regimen, race, and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells.
Results:
Incorporating data from 6 randomized controlled trials, this analysis included 6294 adult patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC.
The combined PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy regimen significantly improved OS (
HR
= 0.
79, 95% CI [0.
75, 0.
84],
P
< .
00001) and PFS (
HR
= 0.
75, 95% CI [0.
70, 0.
80],
P
< .
00001), along with enhancing the ORR (relative risk = 1.
22, 95% CI [1.
15, 1.
29],
P
< .
00001).
Subgroup analyses revealed benefits in OS, PFS, and ORR for patients with CPS ≥ 1, CPS ≥ 5, and CPS ≥ 10 when treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy, with higher PD-L1 expression levels correlating with greater efficacy.
Furthermore, patients with high microsatellite instability exhibited a more pronounced extension in OS (
HR
= 0.
35, 95% CI [0.
21, 0.
59],
P
< .
0001).
However, factors such as age, gender, previous surgery, primary location, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, histological subtype, chemotherapy regimen, race, and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells were not predictive of an OS benefit from PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone.
Regarding safety, the PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy combination led to a higher incidence of immune-mediated adverse events, though there was no significant difference in adverse events leading to death.
Conclusion:
First-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy surpasses chemotherapy alone in efficacy for patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC, particularly in those with CPS ≥ 10 or high microsatellite instability, with tolerable adverse events.
Related Results
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
HER2-positive Apocrine Carcinoma of the Breast: A population-based Analysis of Treatment and Outcome
HER2-positive Apocrine Carcinoma of the Breast: A population-based Analysis of Treatment and Outcome
Abstract
Aims
Apocrine carcinoma of the breast (APO) expresses HER2 in 30-50% of cases. This study explored the clinicopathological features and outcome of HER2+ APO (HER2...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Abstract P1-13-11: Optimal omission of anthracycline in adjuvant chemotherapy of HER2 positive breast cancer
Abstract P1-13-11: Optimal omission of anthracycline in adjuvant chemotherapy of HER2 positive breast cancer
Abstract
[Background]In adjuvant settings of HER2 positive cancer, trastuzumab has been shown to be effective in combination with anthracycline- based chemotherapy f...

