Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Reflection on Indian and Australian Constitutionalism
View through CrossRef
Every country has its own Constitution but it does not imply that Constitutionalism is also flourishing there. The term constitution and constitutionalism reflects two different meaning. As per the scholars, Constitution entrusted with it the written and unwritten principles, which regulate the administration within a nation. On the other hand, ‘Constitutionalism’ refers to those values, ideas and principles that govern the government organs while performing their function and exercising their powers. These values are so inherent, that without which the spirit of constitution cannot be follows. In the general sense constitutionalism refers a government with limited power and it is antithesis of arbitrariness. Professor Gerhard Casper recognized the descriptive and prescriptive usage of constitutionalism. In descriptive sense it often associated with struggle by historians for acknowledgment of common people’s “right to consent” in constitution and establishment of state institutions as crucial aspect of constitution, and In prescriptive approach it concern with functioning of state functionaries in such a manner that it ensures compliance with constitutional spirit. Therefore, constitutionalism describes both source of power and limitation on that power. Once both India and Australia were British colonies, but after the independence, they adopted their own constitution, which has started to work in its own way. India has a unique experience with regard to constitutionalism. It has excellent administrative structure but excessive bureaucratization, pluralistic society and local politics, which often raise a question on constitutionalism. On the other hand Australian constitution emphasis on institutional arrangements for the purpose of protection of rights and it incorporates sufficient safeguards, which ensure collective decision making by politician. The object of the paper is to provide a comparative analysis of Indian and Australian constitutionalism that will be useful to utilize the experiences of one country to promote the constitutionalism. In this paper, firstly researcher discusses the concept of constitutionalism in India and Australia. Researcher attempted to explore that how the concept of constitutionalism is work and at what extent this concept is undermined in both the countries.
Title: Reflection on Indian and Australian Constitutionalism
Description:
Every country has its own Constitution but it does not imply that Constitutionalism is also flourishing there.
The term constitution and constitutionalism reflects two different meaning.
As per the scholars, Constitution entrusted with it the written and unwritten principles, which regulate the administration within a nation.
On the other hand, ‘Constitutionalism’ refers to those values, ideas and principles that govern the government organs while performing their function and exercising their powers.
These values are so inherent, that without which the spirit of constitution cannot be follows.
In the general sense constitutionalism refers a government with limited power and it is antithesis of arbitrariness.
Professor Gerhard Casper recognized the descriptive and prescriptive usage of constitutionalism.
In descriptive sense it often associated with struggle by historians for acknowledgment of common people’s “right to consent” in constitution and establishment of state institutions as crucial aspect of constitution, and In prescriptive approach it concern with functioning of state functionaries in such a manner that it ensures compliance with constitutional spirit.
Therefore, constitutionalism describes both source of power and limitation on that power.
Once both India and Australia were British colonies, but after the independence, they adopted their own constitution, which has started to work in its own way.
India has a unique experience with regard to constitutionalism.
It has excellent administrative structure but excessive bureaucratization, pluralistic society and local politics, which often raise a question on constitutionalism.
On the other hand Australian constitution emphasis on institutional arrangements for the purpose of protection of rights and it incorporates sufficient safeguards, which ensure collective decision making by politician.
The object of the paper is to provide a comparative analysis of Indian and Australian constitutionalism that will be useful to utilize the experiences of one country to promote the constitutionalism.
In this paper, firstly researcher discusses the concept of constitutionalism in India and Australia.
Researcher attempted to explore that how the concept of constitutionalism is work and at what extent this concept is undermined in both the countries.
Related Results
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
It was always based on a teenage love story between the two kids. One is a sniffer and one is not. It was designed for Central Australia because we do write these kids off there. N...
Reimagining digital constitutionalism
Reimagining digital constitutionalism
Abstract
Digital constitutionalism has been in vogue in recent years. A series of journal articles, edited collections and monographs that front the catch term have mushroomed. ...
Sun Yat-Sen’s Constitutionalism
Sun Yat-Sen’s Constitutionalism
In 2013, China witnessed the controversial debate on constitutionalism (xianzheng) which lasted for months. In China, the concept of xianzheng is traceable back to Sun-Yat-sen’s co...
Collective labour rights of police officers: Global labour constitutionalism and militaristic labour constitutionalism
Collective labour rights of police officers: Global labour constitutionalism and militaristic labour constitutionalism
AbstractCollective labour rights, including the right to organize and strike, were recognized in the principles of the International Labour Organization (ILO) as fundamental rights...
Transformation of constitutionalism in contemporary society: conceptual foundations
Transformation of constitutionalism in contemporary society: conceptual foundations
The relevance of the article's topic is determined by the necessity to study the transformation of constitutionalism in modern society in response to dynamic changes in the social,...
Constitutional Breakdown, Backsliding, or New Post-Conventional Constitutionalism?
Constitutional Breakdown, Backsliding, or New Post-Conventional Constitutionalism?
Abstract
In the text the author tackles the issue of constitutional crisis in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). It analyses the social source of constitutionalism in...
Adaptive constitutionalism: author's typology of models and criteria for sustainable legitimacy
Adaptive constitutionalism: author's typology of models and criteria for sustainable legitimacy
Modern constitutionalism faces a fundamental challenge: how to maintain the stability of the constitutional order amid accelerating social, technological, and geopolitical transfor...
Adaptive Constitutionalism: Conceptual Foundations and Institutional Mechanisms in Conditions of Political-Legal Turbulence
Adaptive Constitutionalism: Conceptual Foundations and Institutional Mechanisms in Conditions of Political-Legal Turbulence
The current state of political-legal systems is characterized by the increase of turbulence caused by global, digital, ecological, and social challenges. In these conditions, the t...

