Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Metaphysical Interdependence, Epistemic Coherentism, and Holistic Explanation

View through CrossRef
This paper argues for an alternative to orthodox foundationalist accounts of metaphysical structure as characterized by grounding relations. There are good reasons to take grounding to be a non-symmetric (rather than an asymmetric) relation, and to take facts to be related in complex networks of ground. These networks are closely analogous to the networks of justified beliefs characteristic of coherentism about justification. This position is called metaphysical interdependence. The chapter argues that grounding is an explanatory relation (rather than merely a relation which backs explanations), and that there are good reasons to resist the contention that explanation is asymmetric, including cases seemingly best described as cases of holistic metaphysical explanation. Metaphysical interdependence is a promising account of the metaphysical structure of reality.
Title: Metaphysical Interdependence, Epistemic Coherentism, and Holistic Explanation
Description:
This paper argues for an alternative to orthodox foundationalist accounts of metaphysical structure as characterized by grounding relations.
There are good reasons to take grounding to be a non-symmetric (rather than an asymmetric) relation, and to take facts to be related in complex networks of ground.
These networks are closely analogous to the networks of justified beliefs characteristic of coherentism about justification.
This position is called metaphysical interdependence.
The chapter argues that grounding is an explanatory relation (rather than merely a relation which backs explanations), and that there are good reasons to resist the contention that explanation is asymmetric, including cases seemingly best described as cases of holistic metaphysical explanation.
Metaphysical interdependence is a promising account of the metaphysical structure of reality.

Related Results

Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
The concepts of epistemic injustice and epistemic oppression both aim to track obstacles to epistemic agencyーi.e., forms of epistemic exclusionーthat are undue and persistent. Indee...
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Injustice
<p>“Epistemic injustice” is a fairly new concept in philosophy, which, loosely speaking, describes a kind of injustice that occurs at the intersection of structures of the so...
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Resumo A Epistemologia da Ciência é um campo de estudo que permite analisar o desenvolvimento da ciência em uma postura dialética, que qualifica as questões internas à Ciência, rel...
Causal explanation
Causal explanation
An explanation is an answer to a why-question, and so a causal explanation is an answer to ‘Why X?’ that says something about the causes of X. For example, ‘Because it rained’ as a...
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
Abstract Ideally, we would have beliefs that satisfy norms of truth and rationality, as well as fostering the acquisition, retention and use of other relevant inform...
Epistemic relativism
Epistemic relativism
Broadly speaking, relativism is the view that, at least in some domains, everything or every truth is relative to some standards so that, when two or more people disagree about the...
Epistemic Defence-in-Depth in Mature Safety Regimes
Epistemic Defence-in-Depth in Mature Safety Regimes
Safety governance in high-hazard systems increasingly emphasizes explicit treatment of uncertainty and the strength of knowledge. Yet major accidents continue to reveal a persisten...

Back to Top