Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Carl Schmitt and Martin Buber on the 'realization' of political form

View through CrossRef
This article discusses the Austrian-Jewish philosopher Martin Buber’s theopolitical challenge to the German jurist Carl Schmitt’s political theology of sovereignty, an until recently largely overlooked contribution to the long array of 20thcentury critical engagements with the Schmittean secularization theorem. Departing from Schmitt’s own distinction between formative spirit and substantive form, offered in his early writings on the Roman Catholic Church as political form, this article argues that Buber’s critical engagement with Schmitt’s political doctrine of sin simultaneously reveals the unorthodoxy of the latter’s theological analysis, as it provides a more fruitful way to bring a theologically informed reflection on human nature into dialogue with political thought. It concludes by suggesting that Buber’s theopolitical vision of the self-forming community allow us to imagine human association beyond the narrow confines of theories of state sovereignty. 
Title: Carl Schmitt and Martin Buber on the 'realization' of political form
Description:
This article discusses the Austrian-Jewish philosopher Martin Buber’s theopolitical challenge to the German jurist Carl Schmitt’s political theology of sovereignty, an until recently largely overlooked contribution to the long array of 20thcentury critical engagements with the Schmittean secularization theorem.
Departing from Schmitt’s own distinction between formative spirit and substantive form, offered in his early writings on the Roman Catholic Church as political form, this article argues that Buber’s critical engagement with Schmitt’s political doctrine of sin simultaneously reveals the unorthodoxy of the latter’s theological analysis, as it provides a more fruitful way to bring a theologically informed reflection on human nature into dialogue with political thought.
It concludes by suggesting that Buber’s theopolitical vision of the self-forming community allow us to imagine human association beyond the narrow confines of theories of state sovereignty.
 .

Related Results

Buber's Anti-Kantianism
Buber's Anti-Kantianism
The philosophy of Martin Buber has attracted more attention, both favorable and critical, than has any other modern Jewish philosophy. None of the criticism leveled against Buber's...
Gottesbegriff und Gotteserkenntnis bei Constantin Brunner und Martin Buber
Gottesbegriff und Gotteserkenntnis bei Constantin Brunner und Martin Buber
Abstract The concept of God plays a prominent role in both Constantin Brunner’s and Martin Buber’s writings. In the way they treated this subject there are similarities, but also s...
Buber, Martin (1878–1965)
Buber, Martin (1878–1965)
Existential philosopher, essayist, translator and editor, Martin (Mordechai) Buber (מרטין בובר) was born in Austria and spent his earlier years studying in Vienna and Lemberg (now ...
Ni Karl Marx ni Max Weber. Carl Schmitt y la tiranía de los valores / Neither Karl Marx nor Max Weber. Carl Schmitt and the tyranny of values
Ni Karl Marx ni Max Weber. Carl Schmitt y la tiranía de los valores / Neither Karl Marx nor Max Weber. Carl Schmitt and the tyranny of values
En el presente artículo no trata de ver qué pensador motivó a Carl Schmitt a escribir La tiranía de los valores sino de analizar los matices presentes en la edición privada de 1959...
Perilous Futures
Perilous Futures
The book re-examines Carl Schmitt’s late work, which until fairly recently received less attention because of its seemingly non-systematic nature. The study focuses on Schmitt’s ma...
NEĮVERTINTAS CARLO SCHMITTO PAŽIŪRŲ ASPEKTAS
NEĮVERTINTAS CARLO SCHMITTO PAŽIŪRŲ ASPEKTAS
The main concern of this paper is the analysis of political romanticism and political theology. Today „Politische Romantik“ is regarded as a work in the field of aesthetics or XIX ...
CARL SCHMITT AND FRIEDRICH HAYEK ON DEMOCRACY: ELECTIVE AFFINITIES?
CARL SCHMITT AND FRIEDRICH HAYEK ON DEMOCRACY: ELECTIVE AFFINITIES?
The aim of the present paper is to disclose the structural affinities between Carl Schmitt and Friedrich Hayek regarding the concept of parliamentary democracy. Identifying Hayek’s...

Back to Top