Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: The myth of reinventing the wheel
View through CrossRef
Background & Objective: To review oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.In locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE which is en-bloc resection of levator muscles along with the tumor in a prone position has significantly decreased the rate of having either positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) or tumor perforation. The aim of the study was to determine the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.
Methods: This retrospective study was performed at Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Lahore. Patients who underwent ELAPE for low rectal and anal cancer from January 2014 to December 2019 were selected. Data was collected using an electronic database through a hospital information system.
Results: A total of 82 patients were included in the study having a median age of 39 years. Clinically preoperative tumor sizes were T2:2, T3:65, T4:15. Neo-adjuvant chemo radiotherapy was administered to 79 (96.3%) patients. Pathologically tumor sizes were T0:12, T2:15, T3:50, T4:5 with 79.2% (n=65) R0 resections. The mean operative time was 340.36±64.51 minutes and the mean blood loss was 99 milliliters. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.58±4.64 days. Seventeen (20.7%) cases had pathological circumferential resection margins positive (pCRM<1mm). However, tumor perforation was found in 8(9.8%) patients. Ninety days mortality was none while 36 patients experienced recurrence (local: 23, distant: 30, local + distant 17). The median survival time was 53.00±2.69 months.
Conclusion: For locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE has evolved as a safe oncological procedure with acceptable outcomes.
doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.1.7619
How to cite this: Bakhtiar N, Nasir I, Shah MF, Ihtisham-Ulah, Shakeel O, Khattak S, et al. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: The myth of reinventing the wheel. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(1):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.1.7619
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Title: Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: The myth of reinventing the wheel
Description:
Background & Objective: To review oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.
In locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE which is en-bloc resection of levator muscles along with the tumor in a prone position has significantly decreased the rate of having either positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) or tumor perforation.
The aim of the study was to determine the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.
Methods: This retrospective study was performed at Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Lahore.
Patients who underwent ELAPE for low rectal and anal cancer from January 2014 to December 2019 were selected.
Data was collected using an electronic database through a hospital information system.
Results: A total of 82 patients were included in the study having a median age of 39 years.
Clinically preoperative tumor sizes were T2:2, T3:65, T4:15.
Neo-adjuvant chemo radiotherapy was administered to 79 (96.
3%) patients.
Pathologically tumor sizes were T0:12, T2:15, T3:50, T4:5 with 79.
2% (n=65) R0 resections.
The mean operative time was 340.
36±64.
51 minutes and the mean blood loss was 99 milliliters.
The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.
58±4.
64 days.
Seventeen (20.
7%) cases had pathological circumferential resection margins positive (pCRM<1mm).
However, tumor perforation was found in 8(9.
8%) patients.
Ninety days mortality was none while 36 patients experienced recurrence (local: 23, distant: 30, local + distant 17).
The median survival time was 53.
00±2.
69 months.
Conclusion: For locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE has evolved as a safe oncological procedure with acceptable outcomes.
doi: https://doi.
org/10.
12669/pjms.
40.
1.
7619
How to cite this: Bakhtiar N, Nasir I, Shah MF, Ihtisham-Ulah, Shakeel O, Khattak S, et al.
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: The myth of reinventing the wheel.
Pak J Med Sci.
2024;40(1):---------.
doi: https://doi.
org/10.
12669/pjms.
40.
1.
7619
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/3.
0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Related Results
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach
Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach
Background: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is a relatively new surgical technique for low rectal cancers, enabling a more radical approach than conventional abdomin...
Effectiveness of placing prophylactic mesh with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
Effectiveness of placing prophylactic mesh with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of parastomal hernia prevention with the Sugarbaker technique via laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection fo...
Risk Factors for Anorectal Dysfunction After Interspincteric Resection in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer
Risk Factors for Anorectal Dysfunction After Interspincteric Resection in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer
Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the risk factors for anorectal dysfunction after intersphincteric resection in patients with low rectal cancer.Methods: A total ...
Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal cancer: Initial experiences from 15 consecutive cases at Cho Ray Hospital
Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal cancer: Initial experiences from 15 consecutive cases at Cho Ray Hospital
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer has several challenges regarding the technique issues such as a limited range of motion instruments....
Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
This study reveals the myth criticism on rhyme "Hang Tuah", an Amir Hamzah’s work expressing Malay myth. The Malay myth found in the rhyme "Hang Tuah" is placed as a meeting place ...
Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - Comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines-
Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - Comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines-
Abstract
ObjectivesLocal recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis are more common in rectal cancer than in colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardi...

