Javascript must be enabled to continue!
5.H. Round table: Health care systems, health service provision, and equity in health
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The starting point for this round table is the observation that the research areas of health systems, health services and population health are usually seen as separate academic specialisations. This hampers the potential for getting insights into the role of health care systems and service provision in the development of population health and health inequalities, and of policies to reduce inequalities. As a result of the different mix of disciplines, with different approaches, different research and publication cultures, and different funding sources health systems research, health services research and population health research have tended to grow apart and to ignore the results from the other areas. In this round table session we will discuss the ways health care systems and health service provision influence inequalities in health. This implies looking at different levels of analysis. Health care systems and inequalities in population health refer to the macro level, and both are influenced by the same political and societal context. Health inequalities are also (and more strongly) influenced by structures and processes at macro level outside the health care system and service provision. Health service professionals form the intermediate level; their actual service delivery takes place at the micro level where health care professionals and users meet. Health care professionals and users of services bring their own attitudes, beliefs and resources that influence their interaction and consequent outcomes. Both meso and micro level are influenced by structures and institutions, in society in general as well as in the design of the health care system. The results of the interactions between health care professionals and users are (e.g.) decisions whether or not to use certain types of care, with consequences for the health and functional abilities of users. These decisions and their consequences are patterned by socio-economic characteristics of care users. These aggregate into patterns of inequality at the macro level. Over time, the influence of health care on population health has increased. The responsibility of health care for upstream causes of health inequalities can be strengthened through deliberate policies. With the (long-term) change of morbidity from infectious disease to chronic disease, prevention is often moving to programmes to support people in changing their lifestyle. This in itself exposes the relationships between health care and health inequalities, as those interventions that require a contribution from individuals tend to increase inequalities since those lacking resources will find it harder to participate. In this round table we present a proposal to integrate the three fields of research. We invite specialists from each of these fields and the audience of the round table to react to our proposal. The aim of this round table is to promote cross-disciplinary collaboration. The two organizing EUPHA sections cover the three areas of research in focus.
Key messages
• The same political and societal context influences the health system, service provision and many of the social determinants of population health.
• The potential to address health inequalities through health care may have increased, and requires specific attention to integration of social care and different parts of health care.
Speakers/Panellists
Peter Groenewegen
NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
Ilmo Keskimäki
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
Alastair Leyland
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Ellen Nolte
LSHTM, London, UK
Title: 5.H. Round table: Health care systems, health service provision, and equity in health
Description:
Abstract
The starting point for this round table is the observation that the research areas of health systems, health services and population health are usually seen as separate academic specialisations.
This hampers the potential for getting insights into the role of health care systems and service provision in the development of population health and health inequalities, and of policies to reduce inequalities.
As a result of the different mix of disciplines, with different approaches, different research and publication cultures, and different funding sources health systems research, health services research and population health research have tended to grow apart and to ignore the results from the other areas.
In this round table session we will discuss the ways health care systems and health service provision influence inequalities in health.
This implies looking at different levels of analysis.
Health care systems and inequalities in population health refer to the macro level, and both are influenced by the same political and societal context.
Health inequalities are also (and more strongly) influenced by structures and processes at macro level outside the health care system and service provision.
Health service professionals form the intermediate level; their actual service delivery takes place at the micro level where health care professionals and users meet.
Health care professionals and users of services bring their own attitudes, beliefs and resources that influence their interaction and consequent outcomes.
Both meso and micro level are influenced by structures and institutions, in society in general as well as in the design of the health care system.
The results of the interactions between health care professionals and users are (e.
g.
) decisions whether or not to use certain types of care, with consequences for the health and functional abilities of users.
These decisions and their consequences are patterned by socio-economic characteristics of care users.
These aggregate into patterns of inequality at the macro level.
Over time, the influence of health care on population health has increased.
The responsibility of health care for upstream causes of health inequalities can be strengthened through deliberate policies.
With the (long-term) change of morbidity from infectious disease to chronic disease, prevention is often moving to programmes to support people in changing their lifestyle.
This in itself exposes the relationships between health care and health inequalities, as those interventions that require a contribution from individuals tend to increase inequalities since those lacking resources will find it harder to participate.
In this round table we present a proposal to integrate the three fields of research.
We invite specialists from each of these fields and the audience of the round table to react to our proposal.
The aim of this round table is to promote cross-disciplinary collaboration.
The two organizing EUPHA sections cover the three areas of research in focus.
Key messages
• The same political and societal context influences the health system, service provision and many of the social determinants of population health.
• The potential to address health inequalities through health care may have increased, and requires specific attention to integration of social care and different parts of health care.
Speakers/Panellists
Peter Groenewegen
NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
Ilmo Keskimäki
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
Alastair Leyland
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Ellen Nolte
LSHTM, London, UK.
Related Results
KONTESTASI TASAWUF SUNNÎ DAN TASAWUF FALSAFÎ DI NUSANTARA
KONTESTASI TASAWUF SUNNÎ DAN TASAWUF FALSAFÎ DI NUSANTARA
<p>This article scrutinizes the history of Islamic development in Nusantara between 15th to 18th centuries, which has been colored from theological mysticism thought. Uniquel...
KNOWLEDGE AND PREVENTION OF DEMENTIA AMONG THE ELDERLY
KNOWLEDGE AND PREVENTION OF DEMENTIA AMONG THE ELDERLY
<p class="TableParagraph"><span class="TextRun SCXW51044073 BCX8" lang="ID" xml:lang="ID" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW51044073 BCX8" data-ccp...
Accelerating Birth Equity using Collaborative Systems Mapping
Accelerating Birth Equity using Collaborative Systems Mapping
Abstract
Background
Recognizing the complexity of cross-sector collaboration, holistic and innovative approaches are required to achieve birth equity. This project applied...
Iøjnefaldende arkitektur – Nordens middelalderlige rundkirker
Iøjnefaldende arkitektur – Nordens middelalderlige rundkirker
Conspicuous architecture. Medieval round churches in ScandinaviaThe aim of this article is partly to argue why round churches were built and partly to present an updated overview o...
Evidence for Equity: Introducing Betta Health Equity
Evidence for Equity: Introducing Betta Health Equity
Abstract
There are moments in history that we recognize, only with hindsight, as inflection points—chapters when the arc of progress bends toward justice. We believe the laun...
Section-level genome sequencing and comparative genomics of Aspergillus sections Cavernicolus and Usti
Section-level genome sequencing and comparative genomics of Aspergillus sections Cavernicolus and Usti
Fig. S1. A cladogram representation of the phylogenetic relations between the species in this paper. The red labels show bootstrap values of 100 % and the black labels show bootstr...
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
The increasing aging of our society is putting increasing pressure on the current organization of care and support. This moved the Flemish government to a thorough reform of primar...
SCF Equations for T/Y and K Square-to-Round Tubular Joint
SCF Equations for T/Y and K Square-to-Round Tubular Joint
Summary
A parametric stress analysis of T/Y and K square-to-round tubular joints subjected to axial loads and in-plane and out-of-plane bending moments has been p...

