Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Crime and Punishment—Crime Rates and Prison Population in Europe
View through CrossRef
This paper presents an attempt at establishing an association between crime levels and prison populations across European countries. We observe that the situation in Central and Eastern European countries differs distinctly from the rest of Europe. Building on this, we offer justification that is methodologically based on correlations and regressions of country incarceration rates on crime rates, with reference to governance indicators. Our cross-sectional analysis uses data on crime and prisoner rates by offence from Eurostat and SPACE for the year 2018. The paper’s empirical analysis is preceded by a discussion of the challenges faced when attempting to compare crime between countries in Europe. A review of research focused on relationships between incarceration and crime follows, with the emphasis on the deterrence effect and the prison paradox. Typically, this stream of research uses microdata covering a single country or limited to a smaller geographic area. International comparisons are rare, and are usually based on time series and trend analyses. The quantitative approach applied here is based on recognizing two clusters of countries: the Central and Eastern European (CEE) cluster and the Western European (WE) cluster. We show that the observation of higher prisoner rates and lower crime rates for CEE countries is confirmed with regression analysis. Our study encompasses four types of offences: assault, rape, robbery, and theft. The final section of the paper presents an attempt to incorporate Worldwide Governance Indicators into the analysis of the association between incarceration and crime rates. The results confirm that crime rates in WE countries are distinctly higher than in CEE countries, while incarceration rates in WE are significantly lower than in CEE countries. We think this is due to a higher percentage of crimes being reported and the greater accuracy of police statistics in WE countries. The prison population in each country is largely determined by its criminal and penal policies, which differ substantially between CEE and WE countries (e.g., in terms of frequency of imposing prison sentences and the length of imprisonment). These tendencies result in higher incarceration rates in CEE countries, despite lower crime rates when compared to WE countries.
Title: Crime and Punishment—Crime Rates and Prison Population in Europe
Description:
This paper presents an attempt at establishing an association between crime levels and prison populations across European countries.
We observe that the situation in Central and Eastern European countries differs distinctly from the rest of Europe.
Building on this, we offer justification that is methodologically based on correlations and regressions of country incarceration rates on crime rates, with reference to governance indicators.
Our cross-sectional analysis uses data on crime and prisoner rates by offence from Eurostat and SPACE for the year 2018.
The paper’s empirical analysis is preceded by a discussion of the challenges faced when attempting to compare crime between countries in Europe.
A review of research focused on relationships between incarceration and crime follows, with the emphasis on the deterrence effect and the prison paradox.
Typically, this stream of research uses microdata covering a single country or limited to a smaller geographic area.
International comparisons are rare, and are usually based on time series and trend analyses.
The quantitative approach applied here is based on recognizing two clusters of countries: the Central and Eastern European (CEE) cluster and the Western European (WE) cluster.
We show that the observation of higher prisoner rates and lower crime rates for CEE countries is confirmed with regression analysis.
Our study encompasses four types of offences: assault, rape, robbery, and theft.
The final section of the paper presents an attempt to incorporate Worldwide Governance Indicators into the analysis of the association between incarceration and crime rates.
The results confirm that crime rates in WE countries are distinctly higher than in CEE countries, while incarceration rates in WE are significantly lower than in CEE countries.
We think this is due to a higher percentage of crimes being reported and the greater accuracy of police statistics in WE countries.
The prison population in each country is largely determined by its criminal and penal policies, which differ substantially between CEE and WE countries (e.
g.
, in terms of frequency of imposing prison sentences and the length of imprisonment).
These tendencies result in higher incarceration rates in CEE countries, despite lower crime rates when compared to WE countries.
Related Results
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
The current incarceration facilities for the growing number of women are depriving expecting mothers of adequate care cruci...
Warszawska konspiracja więzienna 1939-1944 (udział polskiego personelu)
Warszawska konspiracja więzienna 1939-1944 (udział polskiego personelu)
Taken over by the Nazi in September 1939, Polish prisons became not only the gallows of many thousands of Poles but also the site of heroic struggle against the invaders ‒ a strugg...
The probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the difference of payoff outperforms previous pool and peer punishment
The probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the difference of payoff outperforms previous pool and peer punishment
AbstractThe public goods game is a multiplayer version of the prisoner’s dilemma game. In the public goods game, punishment on defectors is necessary to encourage cooperation. Ther...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Workshop: Better prison health for better public health
Workshop: Better prison health for better public health
Abstract
According to the latest data, in 2018 about 590,000 people were held in prison on any given day in the EU, and more th...
Hube – Makarewicz – Wolter. Trzy koncepcje karania na przestrzeni stu lat
Hube – Makarewicz – Wolter. Trzy koncepcje karania na przestrzeni stu lat
The article presents the views of three prominent thinkers regarding criminal punishment: Romuald Hube (1803–1890), the father of Polish criminal law, Juliusz Makarewicz (1872–1955...
The Perception about Effectiveness of Capital Punishment as A Determining Factor in Punjab
The Perception about Effectiveness of Capital Punishment as A Determining Factor in Punjab
Public perception about capital punishment in Pakistan has changed in the last few years. This perception is determined by numerous factors i.e., awareness about crimes and punishm...
KEBIJAKAN MODERASI PIDANA MATI
KEBIJAKAN MODERASI PIDANA MATI
ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007 selain menjadi dasar konstitusionalitas pidana mati, juga memberikan jalan tengah (moderasi) terhadap perdebatan antara kelompok yang ingin memp...

