Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Hydrophilic Versus Lipophilic Statin Treatments in Patients With Renal Impairment After Acute Myocardial Infarction

View through CrossRef
Background Hydrophilic and lipophilic statins have similar efficacies in treating coronary artery disease. However, specific factors relevant to renal impairment and different arterial pathogeneses could modify the clinical effects of statin lipophilicity, and create differences in protective effects between statin types in patients with renal impairment. Methods and Results A total of 2062 patients with acute myocardial infarction with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry between November 2011 and December 2015. The primary end point was a composite of 2‐year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACEs) after acute myocardial infarction occurrence. MACEs were defined as all‐cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke. Propensity‐score matching and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed. A total of 529 patients treated with hydrophilic statins were matched to 529 patients treated with lipophilic statins. There was no difference in the statin equivalent dose between the 2 statin groups. The cumulative event rate of MACEs, all‐cause mortality, and recurrent myocardial infarction were significantly lower in patients treated with hydrophilic statins in the propensity‐score matched population (all P <0.05). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients treated with hydrophilic statins had a lower risk for composite MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55–0.90]), all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49–0.93]), and recurrent myocardial infarction (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.21–0.73]), but not for revascularization and ischemic stroke. Conclusions Hydrophilic statin treatment was associated with lower risk of MACEs and all‐cause mortality than lipophilic statin in a propensity‐score matched observational cohort of patients with renal impairment following acute myocardial infarction.
Title: Hydrophilic Versus Lipophilic Statin Treatments in Patients With Renal Impairment After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Description:
Background Hydrophilic and lipophilic statins have similar efficacies in treating coronary artery disease.
However, specific factors relevant to renal impairment and different arterial pathogeneses could modify the clinical effects of statin lipophilicity, and create differences in protective effects between statin types in patients with renal impairment.
Methods and Results A total of 2062 patients with acute myocardial infarction with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.
73 m 2 were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry between November 2011 and December 2015.
The primary end point was a composite of 2‐year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACEs) after acute myocardial infarction occurrence.
MACEs were defined as all‐cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke.
Propensity‐score matching and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed.
A total of 529 patients treated with hydrophilic statins were matched to 529 patients treated with lipophilic statins.
There was no difference in the statin equivalent dose between the 2 statin groups.
The cumulative event rate of MACEs, all‐cause mortality, and recurrent myocardial infarction were significantly lower in patients treated with hydrophilic statins in the propensity‐score matched population (all P <0.
05).
In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients treated with hydrophilic statins had a lower risk for composite MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.
70 [95% CI, 0.
55–0.
90]), all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.
67 [95% CI, 0.
49–0.
93]), and recurrent myocardial infarction (HR, 0.
40 [95% CI, 0.
21–0.
73]), but not for revascularization and ischemic stroke.
Conclusions Hydrophilic statin treatment was associated with lower risk of MACEs and all‐cause mortality than lipophilic statin in a propensity‐score matched observational cohort of patients with renal impairment following acute myocardial infarction.

Related Results

Atheroma Progression in Hyporesponders to Statin Therapy
Atheroma Progression in Hyporesponders to Statin Therapy
Objective— Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins has been demonstrated to slow plaque progression. This antiatherosclerotic effect in patien...
Investigation of the Statin Paradox in Different Populations of VICs
Investigation of the Statin Paradox in Different Populations of VICs
AbstractWhile numerous clinical studies have examined the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statin drugs) on calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), their conflicting results h...
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct Introduction Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...
Does Preoperative Statin Exposure Reduce Prosthetic Joint Infections and Revisions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Does Preoperative Statin Exposure Reduce Prosthetic Joint Infections and Revisions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Introduction: The pleiotropic effects of statins extend beyond managing cardiovascular health and are suggested to modulate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation with prosthetic ...
Right Ventricular Myocardial Infarction: Presentation and Acute Outcomes
Right Ventricular Myocardial Infarction: Presentation and Acute Outcomes
Acute inferior wall myocardial infarction can be complicated by right ventricular myocardial infarction (RVMI), and the excess mortality cannot be fully explained by mechanical rea...

Back to Top