Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Techniques versus Open Surgery for Recurrent Inguinal Hernias: A Meta-Analysis

View through CrossRef
Background: Recurrent inguinal hernias present difficult tasks in surgical approaches to address the issue and enhance patient prognosis. Laparoscopic and other forms of obsolete, less invasive surgery are increasingly being preferred to traditional open surgery. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the effectiveness of minimal approach strategies compared with the open approach for recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Methods: The present study adhered to the PRISMA flowchart and databases search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus. A total of 29 articles were used from the literature published between 2000 and 2024, which compared minimally invasive techniques and open surgery. Meaningfully, assessment parameters drawn from the study were recurrence rates, post-surgery pain, lengths of hospital stay, complications, and, satisfaction. Structural analysis was performed and combined ordinal data were analyzed for comparison of relative effectiveness. Results: It can be seen that, over the different parameters, minimally invasive approaches provided better results. Repeat rate was smaller (6.06% versus 11.14%), early postoperative pain (3.1 versus 5.4 days); shorter hospital stay (2.5 versus 4.8 days). In the following analysis we observed that the complication rate was significantly less in the minimally invasive group (4.2% vs 8.9%) and patient satisfaction index was slightly higher (89.4 vs 76.3). Further, cross-sectional analysis demonstrated cost effectiveness of laparoscopic techniques and precision in complicated cases offered by robotic operations. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that minimally invasive approaches are superior to open surgery in treating recurrent inguinal hernias in terms of postoperative recurrence, recovery, and patient satisfaction. Patient and surgery based tailored treatment planning should be vital for promoting best treatment results.
Title: Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Techniques versus Open Surgery for Recurrent Inguinal Hernias: A Meta-Analysis
Description:
Background: Recurrent inguinal hernias present difficult tasks in surgical approaches to address the issue and enhance patient prognosis.
Laparoscopic and other forms of obsolete, less invasive surgery are increasingly being preferred to traditional open surgery.
Objective: This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the effectiveness of minimal approach strategies compared with the open approach for recurrent inguinal hernia repair.
Methods: The present study adhered to the PRISMA flowchart and databases search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus.
A total of 29 articles were used from the literature published between 2000 and 2024, which compared minimally invasive techniques and open surgery.
Meaningfully, assessment parameters drawn from the study were recurrence rates, post-surgery pain, lengths of hospital stay, complications, and, satisfaction.
Structural analysis was performed and combined ordinal data were analyzed for comparison of relative effectiveness.
Results: It can be seen that, over the different parameters, minimally invasive approaches provided better results.
Repeat rate was smaller (6.
06% versus 11.
14%), early postoperative pain (3.
1 versus 5.
4 days); shorter hospital stay (2.
5 versus 4.
8 days).
In the following analysis we observed that the complication rate was significantly less in the minimally invasive group (4.
2% vs 8.
9%) and patient satisfaction index was slightly higher (89.
4 vs 76.
3).
Further, cross-sectional analysis demonstrated cost effectiveness of laparoscopic techniques and precision in complicated cases offered by robotic operations.
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that minimally invasive approaches are superior to open surgery in treating recurrent inguinal hernias in terms of postoperative recurrence, recovery, and patient satisfaction.
Patient and surgery based tailored treatment planning should be vital for promoting best treatment results.

Related Results

Spectrum Of Hernias Among Children on The Plateau
Spectrum Of Hernias Among Children on The Plateau
Introduction: Hernia is one of the commonest congenital presentations to paediatric surgical clinics worldwide. Most literatures on paediatric hernias discuss mainly inguinal herni...
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
Background: Several methods for fixing inguinal hernias have been documented. Anterior or posterior approaches,open or laparoscopic procedures, may be used for hernia repair. While...
MO674: Risk Factors for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
MO674: Risk Factors for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Abdominal hernias are relatively common non-infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis (PD) pa...
A rare case of herniated duplex collecting system causing obstructive uropathy
A rare case of herniated duplex collecting system causing obstructive uropathy
Abstract Background An inguinal hernia is the protrusion of intraabdominal organs through an opening in the abdominal wall. Structures such as small and large intestines are common...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Anatomical and Surgical Considerations on Lumbar Hernias
Anatomical and Surgical Considerations on Lumbar Hernias
Lumbar hernias, which are rare hernias of the posterolateral abdominal wall, can be divided into two groups: primary lumbar hernias, often the expression of a congenital defect, wh...

Back to Top