Women’s Educating and Coping Strategies for Cultivating Supportive Web-Based Spaces for Discussing Sexual and Reproductive Health: Co-Design Study (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Stigma surrounding women’s sexual and reproductive health (SRH) often prevents them from seeking essential care. In South Korea, unmarried women face strong cultural taboos, increasing their risk for conditions such as pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and cervical cancer. While many unmarried women turn to web-based communities for support, these spaces frequently expose them to microaggressions, further discouraging their access to health care and worsening their health risks. OBJECTIVE We aimed to encourage a safe space for seeking support on the culturally taboo topic of SRH by counteracting and reducing web-based microaggressions. We sought to make these last-resort safe spaces supportive by reducing and preventing microaggressions, fostering coping strategies, and educating rather than solely punishing perpetrators. METHODS We conducted co-design sessions with 14 unmarried Korean women. In the first co-design session, we introduced the term microaggression and collaborated with participants to create base design components aimed at countering and preventing microaggressions. In the second co-design session, participants initially viewed examples of microaggression comments, then designed using the provided base design templates inspired by their suggestions from the first session and finally designed for a scenario where they would be seeking support. We analyzed co-design session transcripts using inductive and deductive methods. RESULTS Our analysis revealed 6 goals addressing coping strategies, educational approaches, and cultural characteristics shaping participants’ designs. Reflective coping strategies were supported through designs that numerically indicate positive support and provide holistic views of diverse perspectives, helping participants reassess provocative situations with cognitive clarity. Suppressive coping strategies were fostered by encouraging less-emotional responses, empowering participants to address microaggressions logically without self-blame. Educational approaches emphasized fostering shared awareness of microaggressions and providing respectful education for perpetrators about the harm their words can cause. Participants suggested counterspeech mechanisms, including rephrasing suggestions and public educational resources, to balance education with freedom of expression. They also proposed that forum-approved experts guide discussions to ensure accurate, empathetic responses and support users in addressing nuanced situations effectively. Cultural characteristics heavily influenced these goals. Participants noted the nebulous nature of microaggressions, their reluctance to burden their social support network, and societal perceptions of women as overly emotional—all of which shaped their desire for designs that enhance logical justification. For example, participants preferred tools such as expert-led discussions and comprehensive perspectives to rationalize their experiences while reducing stigma. CONCLUSIONS Our work advocates for prioritizing educational and explanatory approaches over punitive detection and deletion measures to create supportive web-based spaces for individuals discussing stigmatized SRH. By integrating culturally informed coping strategies, counter speech mechanisms, and educational designs, these tools empower microaggression targets and allies while fostering reflection and behavior change among perpetrators. Our work provides a first step toward counteracting microaggressions and ultimately encouraging women to seek the needed SRH care.