Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Frequency of adverse drug reactions in cancer patients: A study at the oncology department of a university hospital

View through CrossRef
Objectives We aimed to investigate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed in cancer patients, the drugs causing ADRs, ADRs reporting rate, common adverse effects, drug interactions, and the drugs used to manage these adverse effects. Methods A questionnaire about pharmacovigilance, the most common ADRs and side effects observed in oncology patients, the frequency of these ADRs, the drugs causing them, and drug interactions was administered to the volunteers in our study. Results Although 66 out of the 90 nurses who participated in the study reported having previously encountered an ADR, only 39 of them actually reported it. ADRs were most frequently seen once a year or more and 56% of the ADRs were life-threatening, 21% medically important and 23% resulted in hospitalization. The pharmacological groups with the most ADR reports were; Taxanes, Platinum compounds, Monoclonal antibody (Mabs), Antimetabolites, Alkylating agents, Topoisomerase inhibitors and alkaloids respectively. ADRs were specifically related to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Rituximab. The most common adverse effects included; redness, itching, dyspnea and tachycardia. Antihistamines and corticosteroids were most commonly used in treatment of ADRs. The drugs that interacted most with antineoplastics were antibiotics, anticonvulsants and antihypertensives. Conclusion Although the incidence of ADRs in cancer patients is high, the reporting rate is relatively low. ADRs associated with antineoplastic drugs are serious reactions. Identifying which drugs cause the most ADRs is crucial for prevention, monitoring, and treatment.
Title: Frequency of adverse drug reactions in cancer patients: A study at the oncology department of a university hospital
Description:
Objectives We aimed to investigate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed in cancer patients, the drugs causing ADRs, ADRs reporting rate, common adverse effects, drug interactions, and the drugs used to manage these adverse effects.
Methods A questionnaire about pharmacovigilance, the most common ADRs and side effects observed in oncology patients, the frequency of these ADRs, the drugs causing them, and drug interactions was administered to the volunteers in our study.
Results Although 66 out of the 90 nurses who participated in the study reported having previously encountered an ADR, only 39 of them actually reported it.
ADRs were most frequently seen once a year or more and 56% of the ADRs were life-threatening, 21% medically important and 23% resulted in hospitalization.
The pharmacological groups with the most ADR reports were; Taxanes, Platinum compounds, Monoclonal antibody (Mabs), Antimetabolites, Alkylating agents, Topoisomerase inhibitors and alkaloids respectively.
ADRs were specifically related to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Rituximab.
The most common adverse effects included; redness, itching, dyspnea and tachycardia.
Antihistamines and corticosteroids were most commonly used in treatment of ADRs.
The drugs that interacted most with antineoplastics were antibiotics, anticonvulsants and antihypertensives.
Conclusion Although the incidence of ADRs in cancer patients is high, the reporting rate is relatively low.
ADRs associated with antineoplastic drugs are serious reactions.
Identifying which drugs cause the most ADRs is crucial for prevention, monitoring, and treatment.

Related Results

Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Studi Literatur Kasus Adverse Drug Reactions Dari Pengaruh Bahan Eksipien Obat
Studi Literatur Kasus Adverse Drug Reactions Dari Pengaruh Bahan Eksipien Obat
Abstract. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are generally triggered by active substances contained in the drugs used, but it is possible that these ADR events are caused and triggered ...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...

Back to Top