Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prospecting effectiveness

View through CrossRef
Abstract The overall prospecting effectiveness or power of any given method is made up of four component parts. Three of these tend to increase with successful use and the passage of time. These are (a), the operating effectiveness, which, referring to getting the data, is based on the cost of field operations in time and money; (b), the technical effectiveness, which, referring to the quality of the data, is measured by the magnitude of the observational errors; and, (c), the resolving effectiveness, which, referring to the interpretation of the data, is measured by the ability to translate the data into terms of economic significance. The fourth component tends to decrease with successful use and the passage of time, and is, (d), the finding effectiveness, which is determined by the ratio of the magnitudes of findable anomalies to the magnitudes of the current observational errors. At any given time, the overall prospecting effectiveness of a given method is determined by that particular component which displays the minimum effectiveness.In the major petroleum producing provinces of the U.S.A., negligible or decreasing structure finding effectiveness is displayed by all of the successfully used structural prospecting methods with one exception, the drill, the overall structural prospecting power of which is limited by a low operating effectiveness. However, these methods with existing low structural finding powers, surface geology, gravity methods, and seismic methods, display a more than appreciable finding effectiveness for anomalies which cannot be readily interpreted in terms of structure. This situation indicates that the existing low overall efficacy of these various methods is determined not so much by a low absolute finding effectiveness as by a resolving power which is low because of structural inhibitions upon interpretation.The sedimentary hydrocarbon prospecting method was introduced upon a theoretical basis which involved the depth of the source and the postulate of local lateral homogeneity, but did not attain any measure of overall prospecting potency until its interpretation technique was relieved of such purely theoretical inhibitions. Subsequent development has shown that similar limitations upon refraction interpretation were responsible for the collapse of that method in 1930 after the method had displayed marked prospecting effectiveness for shallow high relief structure. Attention is called to the possibility that the removal of similar inhibitions also may result in a similar increase in resolving power for other methods which today display a low structure finding effectiveness, and thus lead to their renaissance because of their thereby increased overall prospecting effectiveness.
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Title: Prospecting effectiveness
Description:
Abstract The overall prospecting effectiveness or power of any given method is made up of four component parts.
Three of these tend to increase with successful use and the passage of time.
These are (a), the operating effectiveness, which, referring to getting the data, is based on the cost of field operations in time and money; (b), the technical effectiveness, which, referring to the quality of the data, is measured by the magnitude of the observational errors; and, (c), the resolving effectiveness, which, referring to the interpretation of the data, is measured by the ability to translate the data into terms of economic significance.
The fourth component tends to decrease with successful use and the passage of time, and is, (d), the finding effectiveness, which is determined by the ratio of the magnitudes of findable anomalies to the magnitudes of the current observational errors.
At any given time, the overall prospecting effectiveness of a given method is determined by that particular component which displays the minimum effectiveness.
In the major petroleum producing provinces of the U.
S.
A.
, negligible or decreasing structure finding effectiveness is displayed by all of the successfully used structural prospecting methods with one exception, the drill, the overall structural prospecting power of which is limited by a low operating effectiveness.
However, these methods with existing low structural finding powers, surface geology, gravity methods, and seismic methods, display a more than appreciable finding effectiveness for anomalies which cannot be readily interpreted in terms of structure.
This situation indicates that the existing low overall efficacy of these various methods is determined not so much by a low absolute finding effectiveness as by a resolving power which is low because of structural inhibitions upon interpretation.
The sedimentary hydrocarbon prospecting method was introduced upon a theoretical basis which involved the depth of the source and the postulate of local lateral homogeneity, but did not attain any measure of overall prospecting potency until its interpretation technique was relieved of such purely theoretical inhibitions.
Subsequent development has shown that similar limitations upon refraction interpretation were responsible for the collapse of that method in 1930 after the method had displayed marked prospecting effectiveness for shallow high relief structure.
Attention is called to the possibility that the removal of similar inhibitions also may result in a similar increase in resolving power for other methods which today display a low structure finding effectiveness, and thus lead to their renaissance because of their thereby increased overall prospecting effectiveness.

Related Results

A PERSPECTIVE OF EXPLORATION FOR PETROLEUM
A PERSPECTIVE OF EXPLORATION FOR PETROLEUM
Abstract The first petroleum prospecting technique, based on the recognition of visible seeps of oil and gas, was rational and direct. The exhaustive application ...
1∶50 000 Geochemical Dataset of Shilipu and Huangzhuguan Map-sheets, Changba Ore Concentration Area, Gansu Province
1∶50 000 Geochemical Dataset of Shilipu and Huangzhuguan Map-sheets, Changba Ore Concentration Area, Gansu Province
Changba area, Gansu Province is located in Changba-Yeshuiheariscan and Indosinian Pb-Zn-Ag-Au metallogenic zone. During the implementation of the project titled Prospecting Predict...
Geochemical Dataset of the 1∶50 000 Shandong Biguo Map Sheet Area
Geochemical Dataset of the 1∶50 000 Shandong Biguo Map Sheet Area
The geochemical dataset of the 1∶50 000 Shandong Biguo map sheet area (also referred to as " the Area”) was achieved by carrying out a mineralogical survey of the Area based on the...
Construction of Conceptual Prospecting Model Based on Geological Big Data: A Case Study in Songtao-Huayuan Area, Hunan Province
Construction of Conceptual Prospecting Model Based on Geological Big Data: A Case Study in Songtao-Huayuan Area, Hunan Province
With the era of big data, the prediction and evaluation of geological mineral resources have gradually entered into a new stage from digital prospecting to intelligent prospecting....
Study on the Geochemical Anomaly of Copper Element Based on Hyperspectral Indices
Study on the Geochemical Anomaly of Copper Element Based on Hyperspectral Indices
<p>Geochemical anomalies are an important indicator in prospecting. In particular, geochemical anomalies of Cu play a very important role in geological prospecting of...
A Preliminary Review of Metallogenic Regularity of Molybdenum Deposits in China
A Preliminary Review of Metallogenic Regularity of Molybdenum Deposits in China
Molybdenum is one of the dominant minerals in China because of its rich reserves. In recent years, outstanding breakthroughs have been made in molybdenum prospecting in China, and ...

Back to Top