Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: short‐term results of a double‐blind randomized controlled trial
View through CrossRef
AbstractAimThere is scepticism regarding anatomical rationale and Doppler guidance for ligation of haemorrhoidal arteries. The null hypothesis of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was that there is no difference in pain following dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy for grade III/IV internal haemorrhoids in a minimum of three quadrants.MethodThis was a single‐centre, double‐blind RCT. Patients were allocated to dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy. Included haemorrhoids were grade III, prolapsing but reducible; and grade IV, chronic non‐incarcerated. The primary end‐point was pain. Patients with external component, acute incarcerated grade IV or recurrent haemorrhoids were not included. The interventions were dearterialization (with Doppler guidance and mucopexy) or haemorrhoidectomy. The main outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).ResultsTwenty dearterialization patients were comparable to 20 haemorrhoidectomy patients for age (P = 0.107), body mass index (P = 0.559), race (P = 0.437), American Society of Anesthesiology score (P = 0.569), comorbidities (P = 0.592), grade (P = 0.096), quadrants (P = 0.222), Fecal Incontinence Quality‐of‐Life Score (FIQOL; P = 0.388), coping (P = 0.532), depression (P = 0.505), embarrassment (P = 0.842), and Short Form Health Survey (SF‐12) physical components (P = 0.337), SF‐12 mental components (P = 0.396) and constipation (P = 0.628) scores. Dearterialization patients had shorter operative time (36 vs 54 min, P = 0.043) with less pain (P = 0.011) and urinary retention (P = 0.012). Dearterialization patients had first bowel movement earlier (1.3 vs 4.6 days, P = 0.001), less pain (P = 0.011) and lower pain intensity (P = 0.001). Narcotic requirements were reduced in dearterialization patients (25% vs 100%, P = 0.001), with less medication (4.9 vs 112 pills, P = 0.001) and shorter regimen (0 vs 7 days, P = 0.001). BPI did not differ on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 except for less pain in dearterialization patients. At 3 months, symptomatic relief was the same with no differences in BPI, FIQOL or SF‐12.ConclusionCompared with haemorrhoidectomy, dearterialization led to less pain in grade III/IV haemorrhoids.
Title: Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: short‐term results of a double‐blind randomized controlled trial
Description:
AbstractAimThere is scepticism regarding anatomical rationale and Doppler guidance for ligation of haemorrhoidal arteries.
The null hypothesis of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was that there is no difference in pain following dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy for grade III/IV internal haemorrhoids in a minimum of three quadrants.
MethodThis was a single‐centre, double‐blind RCT.
Patients were allocated to dearterialization or haemorrhoidectomy.
Included haemorrhoids were grade III, prolapsing but reducible; and grade IV, chronic non‐incarcerated.
The primary end‐point was pain.
Patients with external component, acute incarcerated grade IV or recurrent haemorrhoids were not included.
The interventions were dearterialization (with Doppler guidance and mucopexy) or haemorrhoidectomy.
The main outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
ResultsTwenty dearterialization patients were comparable to 20 haemorrhoidectomy patients for age (P = 0.
107), body mass index (P = 0.
559), race (P = 0.
437), American Society of Anesthesiology score (P = 0.
569), comorbidities (P = 0.
592), grade (P = 0.
096), quadrants (P = 0.
222), Fecal Incontinence Quality‐of‐Life Score (FIQOL; P = 0.
388), coping (P = 0.
532), depression (P = 0.
505), embarrassment (P = 0.
842), and Short Form Health Survey (SF‐12) physical components (P = 0.
337), SF‐12 mental components (P = 0.
396) and constipation (P = 0.
628) scores.
Dearterialization patients had shorter operative time (36 vs 54 min, P = 0.
043) with less pain (P = 0.
011) and urinary retention (P = 0.
012).
Dearterialization patients had first bowel movement earlier (1.
3 vs 4.
6 days, P = 0.
001), less pain (P = 0.
011) and lower pain intensity (P = 0.
001).
Narcotic requirements were reduced in dearterialization patients (25% vs 100%, P = 0.
001), with less medication (4.
9 vs 112 pills, P = 0.
001) and shorter regimen (0 vs 7 days, P = 0.
001).
BPI did not differ on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 except for less pain in dearterialization patients.
At 3 months, symptomatic relief was the same with no differences in BPI, FIQOL or SF‐12.
ConclusionCompared with haemorrhoidectomy, dearterialization led to less pain in grade III/IV haemorrhoids.
Related Results
Haemorrhoids: Aetiology to Management
Haemorrhoids: Aetiology to Management
The definition of “haemorrhoids” and the epidemiology of these conditions have long been contentious. Unfortunately, we still do not understand the full scope of this phenomenon de...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy Compared with Milligan-Morgan Excision for the Treatment of Prolapsing Haemorrhoids: A Prospective Study
Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy Compared with Milligan-Morgan Excision for the Treatment of Prolapsing Haemorrhoids: A Prospective Study
Background: Haemorrhoids, a common rectal and anal pathology, present with symptoms such as pain, bleeding, and prolapse caused by oedematous vascular formations in the anal canal....
Role of Bhesaja and Shalya Chikitsa in Arsha Roga W.S.R. to Haemorrhoids
Role of Bhesaja and Shalya Chikitsa in Arsha Roga W.S.R. to Haemorrhoids
Arsha (Hemorrhoids) is an age-old problem involving ano rectal region. It is notorious for its chroniocity recurrences & frequent acute exacerbations. It has been described vir...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Comparison of post-operative pain in stapled haemorrhoidectomy v/s open haemorrhoidectomy.
Comparison of post-operative pain in stapled haemorrhoidectomy v/s open haemorrhoidectomy.
Objective: To compare mean post-operative pain in stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Setting: Department of Surgery, A...
Haemorrhoid energy therapy versus rubber band ligation for the management of grade I and II haemorrhoids: a randomized trial
Haemorrhoid energy therapy versus rubber band ligation for the management of grade I and II haemorrhoids: a randomized trial
AbstractBackgroundsGrade I and II haemorrhoids are commonly managed in colorectal practice. Management often involves rubber band ligation. The haemorrhoid energy therapy (HET) dev...
ROLE OF RUBBER BAND LIGATION AS A NON-INVASIVE TREATMENT IN HAEMORRHOID W.S.R. TO INTERNAL HAEMORRHOIDS
ROLE OF RUBBER BAND LIGATION AS A NON-INVASIVE TREATMENT IN HAEMORRHOID W.S.R. TO INTERNAL HAEMORRHOIDS
In the present modern age,the majority of people are suffering from haemorrhoids. Mithyaahara- Vihara (faulty food habits and improper sedentary lifestyle) has increased its incide...

