Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857

View through CrossRef
In March 1857 Chief Justice Roger B. Taney announced the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford, which was the Court’s most important decision ever issued on slavery. The decision had a dramatic effect on American politics as well as law. The case involved a Missouri slave named Dred Scott who claimed to be free because his master had taken him to what was then the Wisconsin Territory and is today the state of Minnesota. In the Missouri Compromise (also known as the Compromise of 1820), Congress declared that there would be no slavery north of the state of Missouri. Thus, Scott claimed to be free because he had lived in a federal territory where slavery was not allowed. In an opinion that was more than fi fty pages long, Chief Justice Taney held that Scott was still a slave, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, and that Congress had no power to ban slavery from a federal territory. In a part of the decision that shocked many northerners, Chief Justice Taney also held that blacks could never be citizens of the United States and that they had no rights under the Constitution. With notorious bluntness, Taney declared that blacks were “so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” The decision was criticized by many northerners and led many to support the new Republican Party. While it is an exaggeration to say the case caused the Civil War, Chief Justice Taney’s decision certainly infl amed sectional tensions. It also helped lead to the nomination and election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, which in turn led to secession and the war.
Title: Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857
Description:
In March 1857 Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney announced the opinion of the U.
S.
Supreme Court in Dred Scott v.
John F.
A.
Sandford, which was the Court’s most important decision ever issued on slavery.
The decision had a dramatic effect on American politics as well as law.
The case involved a Missouri slave named Dred Scott who claimed to be free because his master had taken him to what was then the Wisconsin Territory and is today the state of Minnesota.
In the Missouri Compromise (also known as the Compromise of 1820), Congress declared that there would be no slavery north of the state of Missouri.
Thus, Scott claimed to be free because he had lived in a federal territory where slavery was not allowed.
In an opinion that was more than fi fty pages long, Chief Justice Taney held that Scott was still a slave, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, and that Congress had no power to ban slavery from a federal territory.
In a part of the decision that shocked many northerners, Chief Justice Taney also held that blacks could never be citizens of the United States and that they had no rights under the Constitution.
With notorious bluntness, Taney declared that blacks were “so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.
” The decision was criticized by many northerners and led many to support the new Republican Party.
While it is an exaggeration to say the case caused the Civil War, Chief Justice Taney’s decision certainly infl amed sectional tensions.
It also helped lead to the nomination and election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, which in turn led to secession and the war.

Related Results

Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford
In March 1857 Chief Justice Roger B. Taney announced the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. Sandford. The Court’s most important decision on slavery to date, Dred S...
Strader v. Graham: Kentucky's Contribution to National Slavery Litigation the the Dred Scott Decision
Strader v. Graham: Kentucky's Contribution to National Slavery Litigation the the Dred Scott Decision
In 1841, three Kentucky slaves in Louisville boarded a steamboat bound for Cincinnati. Within days, they had made their way to Detroit and then to permanent freedom in Canada. Thei...
Black Wax(ing): On Gil Scott-Heron and the Walking Interlude
Black Wax(ing): On Gil Scott-Heron and the Walking Interlude
The film opens in an unidentified wax museum. The camera pans from right to left, zooming in on key Black historical figures who have been memorialized in wax. W.E.B. Du Bois, Mari...
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford
In March 1857 Chief Justice Roger B. Taney announced the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford, which was the Court’s most important decision ever ...
Law and Politics Reconsidered: A New Constitutional History of Dred Scott
Law and Politics Reconsidered: A New Constitutional History of Dred Scott
This essay synthesizes recent writing on the constitutional history of slavery, featuring Mark Graber's Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (2006). It offers a histor...
Dred Scot v. Sandford
Dred Scot v. Sandford
In March 1857 Chief Justice Roger B. Taney announced the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford, which was the Court’s most important decision ever ...
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford
In March 1857 Chief Justice Roger B. Taney announced the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford, which was the Court’s most important decision ever ...
The best answer? Justice Nelson’s concurrence in Dred Scott v. Sandford
The best answer? Justice Nelson’s concurrence in Dred Scott v. Sandford
Abstract The merits, comparative and absolute, of Justice Samuel Nelson’s concurring opinion in the Dred Scott case of 1857 have not been adequately recognized. Nels...

Back to Top