Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prediction of mortality by echocardiographic parameters: human vs. fully-automated AI-based analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) for echocardiography analysis has been rapidly advancing and integrating into clinical practice. AI applications have demonstrated good accuracy in validation models compared to human experts. It is unclear how fully automated echocardiographic measures correlate with clinical outcomes, as compare to human readers.
Purpose
We aim to compare the performance of AI-based vs human expert-based analysis of echocardiographic measurements in prediction of mortality.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 889 consecutive hospitalized patients who underwent a clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiographic study. Each study was performed by experienced cardiac sonographers and reviewed by expert echocardiologists. All studies were also analyzed by a commercial, fully automated AI software (Us2.AI). For both human and AI measurements, we constructed multivariable models to predict 1-year all-cause mortality. Variables included in the models were selected based on their significance in univariate analysis. Cut-offs values were identified using a decision tree and the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) algorithm. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine which model provided stronger predictive power for mortality.
Results
Of the 889 patients, 731 (82%) patients (mean age 68±16, 46% Female) had sufficient echocardiographic data to be included in the analysis. One-year mortality was 13% (95 patients). Table 1 shows univariate analysis of human and AI measurements for 1-year all-cause mortality. 15 parameters automatically obtained by the AI system were found to be correlated with mortality, while 9 parameters from the human-based analysis were significant. In the multivariable regression model for 1-year mortality (Figure 1), the AI model showed superior predictive value (ROC area under the curve =0.758 vs. 0.709, P=0.041).
Conclusion
In this cohort of hospitalized patients, fully automated AI-based echocardiographic analysis was superior to human expert analysis in prediction of 1-year mortality.
Univariate analysis for mortality
Multivariable regression model
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Prediction of mortality by echocardiographic parameters: human vs. fully-automated AI-based analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) for echocardiography analysis has been rapidly advancing and integrating into clinical practice.
AI applications have demonstrated good accuracy in validation models compared to human experts.
It is unclear how fully automated echocardiographic measures correlate with clinical outcomes, as compare to human readers.
Purpose
We aim to compare the performance of AI-based vs human expert-based analysis of echocardiographic measurements in prediction of mortality.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 889 consecutive hospitalized patients who underwent a clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiographic study.
Each study was performed by experienced cardiac sonographers and reviewed by expert echocardiologists.
All studies were also analyzed by a commercial, fully automated AI software (Us2.
AI).
For both human and AI measurements, we constructed multivariable models to predict 1-year all-cause mortality.
Variables included in the models were selected based on their significance in univariate analysis.
Cut-offs values were identified using a decision tree and the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) algorithm.
We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine which model provided stronger predictive power for mortality.
Results
Of the 889 patients, 731 (82%) patients (mean age 68±16, 46% Female) had sufficient echocardiographic data to be included in the analysis.
One-year mortality was 13% (95 patients).
Table 1 shows univariate analysis of human and AI measurements for 1-year all-cause mortality.
15 parameters automatically obtained by the AI system were found to be correlated with mortality, while 9 parameters from the human-based analysis were significant.
In the multivariable regression model for 1-year mortality (Figure 1), the AI model showed superior predictive value (ROC area under the curve =0.
758 vs.
0.
709, P=0.
041).
Conclusion
In this cohort of hospitalized patients, fully automated AI-based echocardiographic analysis was superior to human expert analysis in prediction of 1-year mortality.
Univariate analysis for mortality
Multivariable regression model.
Related Results
Association of echocardiographic findings with mortality: human assessment vs. automated deep learning analysis
Association of echocardiographic findings with mortality: human assessment vs. automated deep learning analysis
Abstract
Aims
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for echocardiographic image analysis, potentia...
External validation of automated deep-learning based echocardiogram analysis
External validation of automated deep-learning based echocardiogram analysis
Abstract
Background
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in echocardiography is constantly expanding. Several AI algorithms n...
Artificial Intelligence-Based Echocardiographic Left Atrial Volume Measurement with Pulmonary Vein Comparison
Artificial Intelligence-Based Echocardiographic Left Atrial Volume Measurement with Pulmonary Vein Comparison
This paper combines echocardiographic signal processing and artificial intelligence technology to propose a deep neural network model adapted to echocardiographic signals to achiev...
Clinical, Biochemical, and Echocardiographic Characteristics of Severe SARS-COV-2 Infection: Correlates of In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality
Clinical, Biochemical, and Echocardiographic Characteristics of Severe SARS-COV-2 Infection: Correlates of In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality
Background: Patients with cardiovascular disease are more susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and have worse outcomes when infected. While multiple studies have repo...
Comparison of Echocardiographic Parameters Between Left Lateral Decubitus Position and Supine Position
Comparison of Echocardiographic Parameters Between Left Lateral Decubitus Position and Supine Position
Background: Body position significantly influences cardiac hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. While transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is routinely performed in the ...
Impact of Common Anticoagulants on Complete Blood Count Parameters Among Humans
Impact of Common Anticoagulants on Complete Blood Count Parameters Among Humans
Abstract
Introduction
Among the most frequently used anticoagulants in hematological testing are tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), sodium citrate, and sodium heparin. However, there is a n...
Predicting high-risk pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension: An echocardiographic multiparameter scoring index
Predicting high-risk pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension: An echocardiographic multiparameter scoring index
Abstract
Background The risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension proposed by the European Society of Cardiology /European Respiratory Society guidelines in 2...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...

