Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Senate Against Antonius
View through CrossRef
Abstract
HE Senate met on December 20th, convened by tribunes on the specious pretext of taking precautions in advance for the personal safety of the new consuls on the first day of the year, when momentous transactions were announced-as though any individual or party wished to strike down that worthy and innocuous pair, Hirtius and Pansa. The true cause was robably an urgent dispatch from the governor of Cisalpine Gau. Though nothing could be done while Antonius was still consul, Cicero seized the chance to develop a programme for future action. Octavianus had no standing at all before the law, and Brutus was insecure. Antonius was patently in the right when summoning him to surrender the province. That point Cicero could not dispute. He therefore had resort to the most impudent sophistries, delivering a solemn and patriotic panegyric upon treason.1 He demonstrated that if a private army was raised against Antonius, if his troops were mutinous and seditious, Antonius could be no true consul of the Roman People. On the other hand, the adversaries of Antonius deserved full recognition, the soldiery recompense in land and money.
Title: The Senate Against Antonius
Description:
Abstract
HE Senate met on December 20th, convened by tribunes on the specious pretext of taking precautions in advance for the personal safety of the new consuls on the first day of the year, when momentous transactions were announced-as though any individual or party wished to strike down that worthy and innocuous pair, Hirtius and Pansa.
The true cause was robably an urgent dispatch from the governor of Cisalpine Gau.
Though nothing could be done while Antonius was still consul, Cicero seized the chance to develop a programme for future action.
Octavianus had no standing at all before the law, and Brutus was insecure.
Antonius was patently in the right when summoning him to surrender the province.
That point Cicero could not dispute.
He therefore had resort to the most impudent sophistries, delivering a solemn and patriotic panegyric upon treason.
1 He demonstrated that if a private army was raised against Antonius, if his troops were mutinous and seditious, Antonius could be no true consul of the Roman People.
On the other hand, the adversaries of Antonius deserved full recognition, the soldiery recompense in land and money.
Related Results
The Rising Electoral Role of Polarization & Implications for Policymaking in the United States Senate: Assessing the Consequences of Polarization in the Senate from 1914–2020
The Rising Electoral Role of Polarization & Implications for Policymaking in the United States Senate: Assessing the Consequences of Polarization in the Senate from 1914–2020
AbstractThe dramatic Democratic victories in the 2021 Georgia U.S. Senate runoffs handed Democrats their first majority since 2015 and, with this, unified Democratic control of Was...
Fulvia’s Final Act
Fulvia’s Final Act
Abstract
The assassination of Caesar left Antonius as the most powerful man in Rome. Fulvia and her children shared in his fortunes. Fulvia herself became a target o...
DID CICERO ‘PROSCRIBE’ MARCUS ANTONIUS?
DID CICERO ‘PROSCRIBE’ MARCUS ANTONIUS?
Pliny's celebration of Cicero's consular achievements contains a striking anomaly, namely the assertion that Cicero proscribed Marcus Antonius(HN7.117). That statement turns Cicero...
Cicero's Rhetorical Works
Cicero's Rhetorical Works
Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 bce) rose to prominence in the state during the final decades of the Roman Republic. Blessed with a goodly measure of natural ability, an extraordinar...
Rebuilding Romulus’ Senate
Rebuilding Romulus’ Senate
Abstract
In 18 bce the ancient procedure for revising Senate membership, the lectio senatus, was radically changed. Thirty specially chosen senators were to nominate...
Congress and the Defense Budget: 1960–1970
Congress and the Defense Budget: 1960–1970
It is commonly held that Congress has made only inconsequential changes in the President's requests for defense appropriations. Scholarly studies of the budgetary process, notably ...
Cassius Dio’s Ideal Government and the Imperial Senate
Cassius Dio’s Ideal Government and the Imperial Senate
This chapter argues that Dio envisioned a surprisingly minimalist role for the Senate in his ideal government: magistrates and advisors were drawn from the senators, but the empero...
Constitutional Law in 1931–32: The Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the October Term, 1931
Constitutional Law in 1931–32: The Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the October Term, 1931
In its decision in United States v. Smith, the Supreme Court has given final victory to President Hoover in his bitter fight with the Senate in January, 1931, over his appointments...

