Javascript must be enabled to continue!
LEGAL ANALYSIS AGAINST SEX GRATIFICATION ON COURT DECISION NUMBER: 87 /PID.SUS /TPK /2013 / PN.BDG
View through CrossRef
Gratification in criminal law in Indonesia is a gift in the broad sense of discounts, commissions, interest-free loans, travel tickets, and other facilities as a mode to influence a policy that is contrary to its duties and obligations as a public servant or state administrator. Giving is no exception, including the provision of services in the form of sex. However, in Law Number 20 Year 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, the enforcement of categorized gratification law on difficult law enforcement, as its proof is bound by laws and regulations concerning the law of evidence, therefore this type of corruption is not can use the conventional legal system. The alternative to overcome the limitations of Law Number 31 Year 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 200 on Corruption Eradication of Gratification of sex law is to fill the legal vacuum by using the authority of judges during the examination of cases in court. Court verdict Number: 87/ PID.SUS /TPK /2013 PN.BDG found the fact that one of the witnesses in the court provided information that the defendant requested sexual services every Thursday or Friday night, but in legal considerations the fact was not considered, it can be used as evidence against the defendant. The authors, judges in giving consideration of the decision need to elaborate, examine and examine more deeply the facts about the sex gratification associated with the explanation of Article 12 B paragraph 1. For the long term also need to absorb Islamic law as solving the problem of sexual gratification so that found the right solution in legal reform in Indonesia
Title: LEGAL ANALYSIS AGAINST SEX GRATIFICATION ON COURT DECISION NUMBER: 87 /PID.SUS /TPK /2013 / PN.BDG
Description:
Gratification in criminal law in Indonesia is a gift in the broad sense of discounts, commissions, interest-free loans, travel tickets, and other facilities as a mode to influence a policy that is contrary to its duties and obligations as a public servant or state administrator.
Giving is no exception, including the provision of services in the form of sex.
However, in Law Number 20 Year 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, the enforcement of categorized gratification law on difficult law enforcement, as its proof is bound by laws and regulations concerning the law of evidence, therefore this type of corruption is not can use the conventional legal system.
The alternative to overcome the limitations of Law Number 31 Year 1999 in conjunction with Law No.
20 of 200 on Corruption Eradication of Gratification of sex law is to fill the legal vacuum by using the authority of judges during the examination of cases in court.
Court verdict Number: 87/ PID.
SUS /TPK /2013 PN.
BDG found the fact that one of the witnesses in the court provided information that the defendant requested sexual services every Thursday or Friday night, but in legal considerations the fact was not considered, it can be used as evidence against the defendant.
The authors, judges in giving consideration of the decision need to elaborate, examine and examine more deeply the facts about the sex gratification associated with the explanation of Article 12 B paragraph 1.
For the long term also need to absorb Islamic law as solving the problem of sexual gratification so that found the right solution in legal reform in Indonesia.
Related Results
273. Low Positive Predictive Value of β-d-Glucan in Hematology Patients Receiving Antimold Prophylaxis
273. Low Positive Predictive Value of β-d-Glucan in Hematology Patients Receiving Antimold Prophylaxis
Abstract
Background
Detection of β-D-glucan (BDG) in serum is recognized as the mycological evidence in the diagnosis of invasiv...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Criminalization of Gratification as a Corruption Offense
Criminalization of Gratification as a Corruption Offense
Gratification or gifts are criminal acts of corruption, if given to state officials or civil servants. The form of corruption is bribery. This corruption crime was only formulated ...
Jurisprudence for Resolving Crimes of Narcotics Abuse by Children in Indonesia
Jurisprudence for Resolving Crimes of Narcotics Abuse by Children in Indonesia
ABSTRACT
Objectives: This study aims to analyze the application of diversion in Indonesia in the process of resolving narcotics crime cases against children. It is expected that re...
ISLAMIC AND POSITIVE LAW PERSPECTIVES OF GRATIFICATION IN INDONESIA
ISLAMIC AND POSITIVE LAW PERSPECTIVES OF GRATIFICATION IN INDONESIA
A set of rules about gratification is a novelty within society and perceived to collide with the cultural of giving in the Islamic society in Indonesia. This study is aimed to expl...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Penyalahgunaan APBDES
Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Penyalahgunaan APBDES
Abstract. Corruption is an act to enrich oneself or a group is an act that is very detrimental to others, the nation and the state. Corruption is a phenomenon that still requires m...
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kepemilikan Serbuk Ampo sebagai Bahan Peledak (Studi Putusan Nomor: 488/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Tjk)
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kepemilikan Serbuk Ampo sebagai Bahan Peledak (Studi Putusan Nomor: 488/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Tjk)
One of the cases regarding possession of explosives is in Decision Number: 488/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Tjk which states that the defendant Kurniawan Azhar Amran Bin M. Rosyid is guilty of ...

