Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Application of different doses of fospropofol in the induction of general anesthesia: a pilot randomized controlled study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Fospropofol is a propofol prodrug with good water solubility, which is less likely to cause injection pain and intraoperative hypotension than propofol. The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of different doses of fospropofol in the induction of general anesthesia.
Methods
This single-center randomized clinical trial enrolled 125 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive propofol 2 mg/kg (P2 group) or fospropofol 10 mg/kg (F10 group), 12.5 mg/kg (F12.5 group), 15 mg/kg (F15 group), or 20 mg/kg (F20 group). The efficacy and safety end points were the induction success rates of single administration of different doses of fospropofol, the incidences of adverse event, and changes in hemodynamic index and BIS during the 5 min following the first administration.
Results
A total of 125 patients completed this study. The induction success rates of single administration were 100%, 92%, 96%, 100% and 100% (P = 0.508) in the P2 group, F10 group, F12.5 group, F15 group and F20 group, respectively. Our results indicated success rates of F12.5, F15 and F20 groups were not inferior to propofol in general anesthesia induction for ASA I-III adult patients undergoing elective surgeries when the non-inferiority value was − 5% using a one-sided test. Hypotension during induction was the most common side effect. The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the F10 group than in the P2 group (28% vs. 76%; P = 0.006). Compared with the P2 group, the incidence of injection pain was significantly lower in all the fospropofol groups (P༜0.001). In fospropofol groups, the rate of bispectral index (BIS) reaching trough and rising is slower, and the incidence of deep anesthesia is lower (P༜0.001).
Conclusion
Fospropofol has comparable efficacy to propofol when used for the induction of general anesthesia in healthy adults. Considering the success rate and the incidence of adverse reactions, 12.5 ~ 15 mg/kg of fospropofol may be a potential option for general anesthesia induction.
Trial registration
The trial was retrospectively registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on Dec 13, 2022 (ChiCTR2200066678).
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Application of different doses of fospropofol in the induction of general anesthesia: a pilot randomized controlled study
Description:
Abstract
Background
Fospropofol is a propofol prodrug with good water solubility, which is less likely to cause injection pain and intraoperative hypotension than propofol.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of different doses of fospropofol in the induction of general anesthesia.
Methods
This single-center randomized clinical trial enrolled 125 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive propofol 2 mg/kg (P2 group) or fospropofol 10 mg/kg (F10 group), 12.
5 mg/kg (F12.
5 group), 15 mg/kg (F15 group), or 20 mg/kg (F20 group).
The efficacy and safety end points were the induction success rates of single administration of different doses of fospropofol, the incidences of adverse event, and changes in hemodynamic index and BIS during the 5 min following the first administration.
Results
A total of 125 patients completed this study.
The induction success rates of single administration were 100%, 92%, 96%, 100% and 100% (P = 0.
508) in the P2 group, F10 group, F12.
5 group, F15 group and F20 group, respectively.
Our results indicated success rates of F12.
5, F15 and F20 groups were not inferior to propofol in general anesthesia induction for ASA I-III adult patients undergoing elective surgeries when the non-inferiority value was − 5% using a one-sided test.
Hypotension during induction was the most common side effect.
The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the F10 group than in the P2 group (28% vs.
76%; P = 0.
006).
Compared with the P2 group, the incidence of injection pain was significantly lower in all the fospropofol groups (P༜0.
001).
In fospropofol groups, the rate of bispectral index (BIS) reaching trough and rising is slower, and the incidence of deep anesthesia is lower (P༜0.
001).
Conclusion
Fospropofol has comparable efficacy to propofol when used for the induction of general anesthesia in healthy adults.
Considering the success rate and the incidence of adverse reactions, 12.
5 ~ 15 mg/kg of fospropofol may be a potential option for general anesthesia induction.
Trial registration
The trial was retrospectively registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on Dec 13, 2022 (ChiCTR2200066678).
Related Results
Heat Flow and Distribution during Induction of General Anesthesia
Heat Flow and Distribution during Induction of General Anesthesia
Background
Core hypothermia after induction of general anesthesia results from an internal core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat and a net loss of heat to the ...
Nursing Methods and Experience of Local Anesthesia Patients under Arthroscope
Nursing Methods and Experience of Local Anesthesia Patients under Arthroscope
In order to solve the nursing problems of local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy, a nursing method and experience based on local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy was prop...
Spinal Anesthesia Speeds Active Postoperative Rewarming
Spinal Anesthesia Speeds Active Postoperative Rewarming
Background
Redistribution of body heat decreases core temperature more during general than regional anesthesia. However, the combination of anesthetic- and sedative-ind...
IOR Pilot Evaluation in a Brown-Field Fractured Reservoir Using Data Analytics of Reservoir Simulation Results
IOR Pilot Evaluation in a Brown-Field Fractured Reservoir Using Data Analytics of Reservoir Simulation Results
Abstract
A well-designed pilot is instrumental in reducing uncertainty for the full-field implementation of improved oil recovery (IOR) operations. Traditional model...
THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA/ GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR LAPROSCOPY SURGERY
THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA/ GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR LAPROSCOPY SURGERY
Background:Laparoscopic surgeries are usually done under general anesthesia, but many patients with major medical problems sometimes cannot tolerate such anesthesia, and thoracic s...
The impact of general anesthesia versus neuraxial anesthesia on obstetric outcomes of elective cesarean sections
The impact of general anesthesia versus neuraxial anesthesia on obstetric outcomes of elective cesarean sections
Objective. To determine which type of anesthesia, general or spinal, causes less amount of blood loss in elective cesarean section. Patients and methods. An observational randomize...
Effects of remifentanil pretreatment on sufentanil-induced cough suppression during the induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
Effects of remifentanil pretreatment on sufentanil-induced cough suppression during the induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Sufentanil is widely used for induction of general anesthesia, however, sufentanil can lead to cough during general anesthesia induction. This study ai...
Local anesthesia with and without conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for oral surgical procedures in pediatric patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study
Local anesthesia with and without conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for oral surgical procedures in pediatric patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study
Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia with or without conscious sedation for minor oral surgery procedures in pediatric patients. M...

