Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Rock record constraints on the seismic signature of subduction interface shear zones
View through CrossRef
<p>The low velocity layer (LVL) in modern subduction zones is a 3-5 km thick region that parallels the top of the downgoing slab and is characterized by anomalously high V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> ratios (1.8-2.5) consistent with 2.5-4% fracture porosity at near-lithostatic pore fluid pressures. The LVL has been previously interpreted as partially hydrated, relatively undeformed oceanic crust at the top of the downgoing slab, but collocation of the LVL with episodic tremor and slow slip events (ETS) in modern subduction zones suggests that the LVL may alternatively represent the seismic signature of a subduction interface shear zone.&#160;</p><p>To test this hypothesis, we use field & structural observations, geochronology, and seismic velocity calculations to compare and contrast the bulk seismic properties of a fossil subduction interface shear zone (Condrey Mountain Schist, CMS, northern CA) to properties of modern LVLs. Specifically, we 1) determined thicknesses of underplated packages (interpreted to represent the maximum thickness of the actively deforming interface) using depositional age discontinuities and high resolution structural mapping, 2) averaged the bulk rock seismic velocities weighted by mapped lithologic proportions and corrected for pressure-temperature effects, and 3) used field evidence of modifying factors (e.g., microcracks, fluid-filled veins, mineral anisotropy) to further refine the possible range of seismic velocities and effects on V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> ratio.</p><p>The CMS greenschist- to blueschist-facies units were subducted to ~25-35 km (450&#176;C, 0.8-1.0 GPa) with limited retrogression or exhumational overprint. These rocks were underplated episodically at depth in three packages individually up to 4.5 km thick from 155-135 Ma, based on detrital zircon data. Each package is dominantly composed of metasedimentary rocks with m- to km-scale metamafic and serpentinized ultramafic lenses. Strain localization to ~1 km thick ductile shear zones between underplating episodes is collocated with km-scale serpentinized ultramafic lenses at the base of each package. Deformation was distributed and ductile with rare macro- or micro-scale prograde brittle failure in the metasedimentary or metamafic units. In the serpentinized ultramafics, ductile shear zones wrap massive blocks with prograde brittle fracture. Maximum fracture porosity estimated from relict veins is ~10%. Average V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> for the CMS is ~1.6 (lithology alone) but up to 3.0 (accounting for maximum fracture porosity).</p><p>The fossil subduction interface shear zone preserved in the CMS is consistent in both thickness and seismic signature with the LVL in modern subduction zones. Estimated V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> is higher than the LVL but assumes that all fractures are simultaneously open. The total thickness of the CMS (10+ km) is greater than the LVL, however, so previously underplated material must lose its anomalous seismic signature during underplating (e.g., due to fluid loss and transport up the slab during or after underplating). Our results support the hypothesis that LVLs in modern subduction zones represent the seismic signature of the subduction interface shear zone.</p>
Title: Rock record constraints on the seismic signature of subduction interface shear zones
Description:
<p>The low velocity layer (LVL) in modern subduction zones is a 3-5 km thick region that parallels the top of the downgoing slab and is characterized by anomalously high V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> ratios (1.
8-2.
5) consistent with 2.
5-4% fracture porosity at near-lithostatic pore fluid pressures.
The LVL has been previously interpreted as partially hydrated, relatively undeformed oceanic crust at the top of the downgoing slab, but collocation of the LVL with episodic tremor and slow slip events (ETS) in modern subduction zones suggests that the LVL may alternatively represent the seismic signature of a subduction interface shear zone.
&#160;</p><p>To test this hypothesis, we use field & structural observations, geochronology, and seismic velocity calculations to compare and contrast the bulk seismic properties of a fossil subduction interface shear zone (Condrey Mountain Schist, CMS, northern CA) to properties of modern LVLs.
Specifically, we 1) determined thicknesses of underplated packages (interpreted to represent the maximum thickness of the actively deforming interface) using depositional age discontinuities and high resolution structural mapping, 2) averaged the bulk rock seismic velocities weighted by mapped lithologic proportions and corrected for pressure-temperature effects, and 3) used field evidence of modifying factors (e.
g.
, microcracks, fluid-filled veins, mineral anisotropy) to further refine the possible range of seismic velocities and effects on V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> ratio.
</p><p>The CMS greenschist- to blueschist-facies units were subducted to ~25-35 km (450&#176;C, 0.
8-1.
0 GPa) with limited retrogression or exhumational overprint.
These rocks were underplated episodically at depth in three packages individually up to 4.
5 km thick from 155-135 Ma, based on detrital zircon data.
Each package is dominantly composed of metasedimentary rocks with m- to km-scale metamafic and serpentinized ultramafic lenses.
Strain localization to ~1 km thick ductile shear zones between underplating episodes is collocated with km-scale serpentinized ultramafic lenses at the base of each package.
Deformation was distributed and ductile with rare macro- or micro-scale prograde brittle failure in the metasedimentary or metamafic units.
In the serpentinized ultramafics, ductile shear zones wrap massive blocks with prograde brittle fracture.
Maximum fracture porosity estimated from relict veins is ~10%.
Average V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> for the CMS is ~1.
6 (lithology alone) but up to 3.
0 (accounting for maximum fracture porosity).
</p><p>The fossil subduction interface shear zone preserved in the CMS is consistent in both thickness and seismic signature with the LVL in modern subduction zones.
Estimated V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub> is higher than the LVL but assumes that all fractures are simultaneously open.
The total thickness of the CMS (10+ km) is greater than the LVL, however, so previously underplated material must lose its anomalous seismic signature during underplating (e.
g.
, due to fluid loss and transport up the slab during or after underplating).
Our results support the hypothesis that LVLs in modern subduction zones represent the seismic signature of the subduction interface shear zone.
</p>.
Related Results
Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Subduction of an oceanic plate beneath either an oceanic, or a continental, overriding plate requires two main conditions to occur in a steady state: i) a high enough subduction ra...
Increased life expectancy of heart failure patients in a rural center by a multidisciplinary program
Increased life expectancy of heart failure patients in a rural center by a multidisciplinary program
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
INTRODUCTION Patients with heart failure (HF)...
Observations of the soil particle movement during direct shear tests on soil-geosynthetic interfaces
Observations of the soil particle movement during direct shear tests on soil-geosynthetic interfaces
The shear strength between soil-geosynthetic interface has been well studied by conducting large scale direct shear tests. However, the documents of the development of shear band a...
Future Directions of Multicomponent Seismic Methods in the Marine Environment
Future Directions of Multicomponent Seismic Methods in the Marine Environment
Abstract
Multicomponent seismic recording (4C) is becoming more common in several offshore seismic applications. Faithfully recording all Cartesian components of ...
Unstable Shear Slip Failure and Seismic Potential Investigation Using DEM in Underground Mining
Unstable Shear Slip Failure and Seismic Potential Investigation Using DEM in Underground Mining
Abstract
Perturbations arising from mining operations significantly affect the stability of rock masses, and the influences aggerates with the rapid increase of mining-operation de...
Reliability-based design (RBD) of shallow foundations on rock masses
Reliability-based design (RBD) of shallow foundations on rock masses
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The reliability-based design (RBD) approach that separately accounts for variability and uncertainty in load(...
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
SUMMARY
New technologies are rapidly emerging helping to obtain optimal drainage of large reservoirs. 4D seismic is such a reservoir monitoring technique. The phy...
Improvement of Seismic Performance of Ordinary Reinforced Partially Grouted Concrete Masonry Shear Walls
Improvement of Seismic Performance of Ordinary Reinforced Partially Grouted Concrete Masonry Shear Walls
Reinforced masonry constitutes about 10% of all low-rise construction in the US. Most of these structures are commercial and school buildings. It may also be used for multi-story h...

