Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Leniency policy in competition law: Legal issues and socio-cultural implications in Albania
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Leniency policy is an essential instrument of public enforcement of competition law, which promotes the detection of economic cartels through cooperation with the offenders, who serve as whistle-blowers. This study analyses the effectiveness and challenges of this policy in the European Union (EU) and Albania. Leniency policy has been one of the main reasons for the success in detecting cartels in the EU. On the other hand, although Albania has approximated the rules on leniency with those of the EU, leniency policy has not been successful. This article focuses on exploring the reasons for this phenomenon. The methodology used to answer the research question combines desk-review of EU legislation, Albanian legislation on competition and leniency, as well as the doctrine regarding the effectiveness of this policy. Another methodology used to address the research question is the comparative one between the reasons for the success of the leniency policy in the EU and the lack of success of the same policy in Albania. This study elaborates three key recommendations to improve Albanian leniency policy: improving the legal certainty and confidentiality of this policy, criminalizing cartels, and improving public awareness.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: Leniency policy in competition law: Legal issues and socio-cultural implications in Albania
Description:
Abstract
Leniency policy is an essential instrument of public enforcement of competition law, which promotes the detection of economic cartels through cooperation with the offenders, who serve as whistle-blowers.
This study analyses the effectiveness and challenges of this policy in the European Union (EU) and Albania.
Leniency policy has been one of the main reasons for the success in detecting cartels in the EU.
On the other hand, although Albania has approximated the rules on leniency with those of the EU, leniency policy has not been successful.
This article focuses on exploring the reasons for this phenomenon.
The methodology used to answer the research question combines desk-review of EU legislation, Albanian legislation on competition and leniency, as well as the doctrine regarding the effectiveness of this policy.
Another methodology used to address the research question is the comparative one between the reasons for the success of the leniency policy in the EU and the lack of success of the same policy in Albania.
This study elaborates three key recommendations to improve Albanian leniency policy: improving the legal certainty and confidentiality of this policy, criminalizing cartels, and improving public awareness.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Service leniency: a dual logics perspective
Service leniency: a dual logics perspective
Purpose
A pervasive yet underexplored phenomenon in service delivery is the tendency toward leniency, which can ultimately lead to negligence in service interac...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
Problem setting. Digitalization has recently become increasingly important in the professional everyday life of a lawyer. Since 2020, trends in the automation of legal processes ha...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Is the leniency asymmetry really dead? Misinterpreting asymmetry effects in criminal jury deliberation
Is the leniency asymmetry really dead? Misinterpreting asymmetry effects in criminal jury deliberation
Early jury simulation research, reviewed and meta-anyalysed by MacCoun and Kerr (1988), suggested a leniency asymmetry in criminal jury deliberations such that a given faction favo...
Leniency Policies and Cartel Success: An Experiment
Leniency Policies and Cartel Success: An Experiment
Abstract
Cartels are often fought by granting leniency, in the form of forgiveness of penalties, to whistle-blowers. This study employs a laboratory experiment to compare l...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...

