Judicial precedent in the Romano-Germanic legal family

The article is devoted to the study of the institution of judicial precedent in the Romano- Germanic legal family. It is established that the countries of the Romano-Germanic legal family, unlike the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family under the influence of Roman law, in the context of codification of law, have determined for themselves the priority source of law - law, not precedent. However, there is a gradual increase in the role of judicial precedent in continental law countries due to a number of factors that contribute to the intensification of judicial rulemaking. First, in these countries, there are still branches of law that, for various reasons, either do not have legal regulation or are regulated only by general reference rules or framework provisions. For objective reasons, the legislator cannot foresee the entire variety of real-life phenomena. This pushes the courts to adopt legal provisions that can fill in the gaps in the legal regulation of social relations. Secondly, there is a noticeable lag between legislation and dynamically changing social relations, resulting in the formation of large segments of social life regulated by legal acts that have lost their relevance. The current realities, which are largely full of unpredictable events, highlight the need for legal systems to adapt. All of this contributes to the use of judicial precedents, which serve not only as a tool for resolving specific disputes, but also as a means of developing law, allowing to fill existing «gaps in law». In the Romano-Germanic legal family, the real legal force of a judicial precedent is determined not so much by its formal enshrinement in legal acts as by actual life circumstances. Real-life situations, as well as the practical necessity and demand for precedent as a source of law, play a key role in determining its true legal status and legal force. Judicial precedent in continental law countries is becoming increasingly important, becoming an integral element of dynamic and adaptive legal regulation over time, and the rules establishing the generally binding force of precedents and the discretionary powers of authorized bodies are increasingly common in both public and private law in these countries. Judicial precedent in these countries should be considered as a source of law from a practical point of view, focusing on solving problems arising in the process of law enforcement.