Javascript must be enabled to continue!
YULY AYKHENVALD’S CONCEPT OF SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES
View through CrossRef
The authors analyze the Shakespearean studies by Yuly Aykhenvald (1872–1928), a famous literary critic who substantiated the method of immanent criticism and is better known as the creator of Russian writers’ “portraits.” The purpose of the work was to consider and streamline the principles of analysis of Shakespearean images in Aykhenvald’s legacy. The objectives of the work included identifying the main images for the critic in Shakespeare’s tragedies; analysis of the principles of his criticism; identifying the ideological foundations of criticism. Results of the work: Aykhenvald considers Shakespeare’s tragedies a timeless phenomenon, telling us not so much even about the life of the human spirit, but about the laws of the development of the world. Aykhenvald interprets Shakespeare as a sage immersed in the truths of world dualism as a Neoplatonic teaching of the Gnostic persuasion. The critic sees in Caliban the embodiment of crude matter (which then makes it possible to liken him to the Bolsheviks with their materialistic philosophy), in Ariel he sees pure spirituality, and in Hamlet — the transitional period of human existence between them. Hamlet is understood by Aykhenvald as the central Shakespearean character, a kind of archetype of the Shakespearean hero, reflected in the others: Lear, Romeo, Macbeth. Hamlet is also considered by Aykhenvald to be an image of our contemporary, with his inherent dominance of reflection and inaction. However, Aykhenvald expresses the hope that beyond the Hamlet stage, humanity will reach a spiritual existence, which is symbolized by Ariel.
Title: YULY AYKHENVALD’S CONCEPT OF SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES
Description:
The authors analyze the Shakespearean studies by Yuly Aykhenvald (1872–1928), a famous literary critic who substantiated the method of immanent criticism and is better known as the creator of Russian writers’ “portraits.
” The purpose of the work was to consider and streamline the principles of analysis of Shakespearean images in Aykhenvald’s legacy.
The objectives of the work included identifying the main images for the critic in Shakespeare’s tragedies; analysis of the principles of his criticism; identifying the ideological foundations of criticism.
Results of the work: Aykhenvald considers Shakespeare’s tragedies a timeless phenomenon, telling us not so much even about the life of the human spirit, but about the laws of the development of the world.
Aykhenvald interprets Shakespeare as a sage immersed in the truths of world dualism as a Neoplatonic teaching of the Gnostic persuasion.
The critic sees in Caliban the embodiment of crude matter (which then makes it possible to liken him to the Bolsheviks with their materialistic philosophy), in Ariel he sees pure spirituality, and in Hamlet — the transitional period of human existence between them.
Hamlet is understood by Aykhenvald as the central Shakespearean character, a kind of archetype of the Shakespearean hero, reflected in the others: Lear, Romeo, Macbeth.
Hamlet is also considered by Aykhenvald to be an image of our contemporary, with his inherent dominance of reflection and inaction.
However, Aykhenvald expresses the hope that beyond the Hamlet stage, humanity will reach a spiritual existence, which is symbolized by Ariel.
Related Results
Pushkin in Yuly Aykhenvald’s Philosophical and Aesthetic System
Pushkin in Yuly Aykhenvald’s Philosophical and Aesthetic System
<p>The article raised the question of the role of the Pushkinian principle in the philosophical and aesthetic system of Yu. I. Aykhenvald, one of the leadin...
Yuly Aykhenvald: transformation of views
Yuly Aykhenvald: transformation of views
The present article is devoted to creative activity of Yuly Aykhenvald who is associated with Fin de siècle in history of Russian culture. Even in emigration (since 1922) he had be...
A Letter from Boris Zaitsev to Yuly Aykhenvald
A Letter from Boris Zaitsev to Yuly Aykhenvald
: A letter on July 29, 1927 from B.K. Zaitsev to Yu.I. Aykhenvald is published and commented. The history of the relationship between Zaitsev and Aykhenvald is briefly outlined. Mo...
Jonson vs. Shakespeare: The Roman Plays
Jonson vs. Shakespeare: The Roman Plays
Critics rarely bring Ben Jonson's two Roman tragedies – Sejanus and Catiline – into proximity with Shakespeare's four Roman tragedies – Titus Andronicus, Julius Caesar, Antony and ...
A Critical Analysis of Adaptation, Domestication and Foreignization as Effective Strategies for Translating Shakespeare’s Plays into Assamese
A Critical Analysis of Adaptation, Domestication and Foreignization as Effective Strategies for Translating Shakespeare’s Plays into Assamese
One of the major challenges faced by the translators is finding equivalence in the target language. The translators of Shakespeare plays have used Assamese words as appropriate equ...
Les adaptations textuelles et scéniques de Shakespeare en Inde coloniale (1852-1932) : enjeux et processus
Les adaptations textuelles et scéniques de Shakespeare en Inde coloniale (1852-1932) : enjeux et processus
La présente thèse de doctorat étudie les premières adaptations indiennes du théâtre de Shakespeare dont la création remonte à l'époque coloniale. La période choisie pour la thèse v...
Digital Humanities’ Shakespeare Problem
Digital Humanities’ Shakespeare Problem
Digital humanities has a Shakespeare problem; or, to frame it more broadly, a canon problem. This essay begins by demonstrating why we need to consider Shakespeare’s position in th...
Exploring Gender Relations via Shakespeare: Students’ perspectives on Shakespeare’s life
Exploring Gender Relations via Shakespeare: Students’ perspectives on Shakespeare’s life
In this article, we discuss the application of feminist theory and criticism in the teaching of Shakespeare in higher education institutions and consider biographical approaches to...

