Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

YULY AYKHENVALD’S CONCEPT OF SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES

View through CrossRef
The authors analyze the Shakespearean studies by Yuly Aykhenvald (1872–1928), a famous literary critic who substantiated the method of immanent criticism and is better known as the creator of Russian writers’ “portraits.” The purpose of the work was to consider and streamline the principles of analysis of Shakespearean images in Aykhenvald’s legacy. The objectives of the work included identifying the main images for the critic in Shakespeare’s tragedies; analysis of the principles of his criticism; identifying the ideological foundations of criticism. Results of the work: Aykhenvald considers Shakespeare’s tragedies a timeless phenomenon, telling us not so much even about the life of the human spirit, but about the laws of the development of the world. Aykhenvald interprets Shakespeare as a sage immersed in the truths of world dualism as a Neoplatonic teaching of the Gnostic persuasion. The critic sees in Caliban the embodiment of crude matter (which then makes it possible to liken him to the Bolsheviks with their materialistic philosophy), in Ariel he sees pure spirituality, and in Hamlet — the transitional period of human existence between them. Hamlet is understood by Aykhenvald as the central Shakespearean character, a kind of archetype of the Shakespearean hero, reflected in the others: Lear, Romeo, Macbeth. Hamlet is also considered by Aykhenvald to be an image of our contemporary, with his inherent dominance of reflection and inaction. However, Aykhenvald expresses the hope that beyond the Hamlet stage, humanity will reach a spiritual existence, which is symbolized by Ariel.
Title: YULY AYKHENVALD’S CONCEPT OF SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES
Description:
The authors analyze the Shakespearean studies by Yuly Aykhenvald (1872–1928), a famous literary critic who substantiated the method of immanent criticism and is better known as the creator of Russian writers’ “portraits.
” The purpose of the work was to consider and streamline the principles of analysis of Shakespearean images in Aykhenvald’s legacy.
The objectives of the work included identifying the main images for the critic in Shakespeare’s tragedies; analysis of the principles of his criticism; identifying the ideological foundations of criticism.
Results of the work: Aykhenvald considers Shakespeare’s tragedies a timeless phenomenon, telling us not so much even about the life of the human spirit, but about the laws of the development of the world.
Aykhenvald interprets Shakespeare as a sage immersed in the truths of world dualism as a Neoplatonic teaching of the Gnostic persuasion.
The critic sees in Caliban the embodiment of crude matter (which then makes it possible to liken him to the Bolsheviks with their materialistic philosophy), in Ariel he sees pure spirituality, and in Hamlet — the transitional period of human existence between them.
Hamlet is understood by Aykhenvald as the central Shakespearean character, a kind of archetype of the Shakespearean hero, reflected in the others: Lear, Romeo, Macbeth.
Hamlet is also considered by Aykhenvald to be an image of our contemporary, with his inherent dominance of reflection and inaction.
However, Aykhenvald expresses the hope that beyond the Hamlet stage, humanity will reach a spiritual existence, which is symbolized by Ariel.

Related Results

Pushkin in Yuly Aykhenvald’s Philosophical and Aesthetic System
Pushkin in Yuly Aykhenvald’s Philosophical and Aesthetic System
<p>The article raised the question of the role of the Pushkinian principle in the philosophical and aesthetic system of Yu.&nbsp;I.&nbsp;Aykhenvald, one of the leadin...
Yuly Aykhenvald: transformation of views
Yuly Aykhenvald: transformation of views
The present article is devoted to creative activity of Yuly Aykhenvald who is associated with Fin de siècle in history of Russian culture. Even in emigration (since 1922) he had be...
Jonson vs. Shakespeare: The Roman Plays
Jonson vs. Shakespeare: The Roman Plays
Critics rarely bring Ben Jonson's two Roman tragedies – Sejanus and Catiline – into proximity with Shakespeare's four Roman tragedies – Titus Andronicus, Julius Caesar, Antony and ...
A Letter from Boris Zaitsev to Yuly Aykhenvald
A Letter from Boris Zaitsev to Yuly Aykhenvald
: A letter on July 29, 1927 from B.K. Zaitsev to Yu.I. Aykhenvald is published and commented. The history of the relationship between Zaitsev and Aykhenvald is briefly outlined. Mo...
Shakespeare in a Blender
Shakespeare in a Blender
As a collective with four to six members at any one time, A Company of Fools’ mandate is to create innovative and accessible pieces based on the works of William Shakespeare. The c...
Shakespeare and Text
Shakespeare and Text
Abstract OXFORD SHAKESPEARE TOPICS General Editors: Peter Holland and Stanley Wells Oxford Shakespeare Topics provide students and teachers with short books on impor...
Wittgenstein’s Shakespeare
Wittgenstein’s Shakespeare
AbstractWittgenstein’s oddly negative assessment of Shakespeare has caused consternation among literary critics. From F. R. Leavis to the present, English critics have often assume...

Back to Top