Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

From managing fish to managing people: requirements for effective fisheries governance and management in Europe

View through CrossRef
Despite the increasingly successful implementation of stock management under the EU Common Fisheries Policy, managing fisheries in a sustainable, integrated, and coordinated way remains a challenge. In helping to explain the persistent challenge of achieving sustainable outcomes in EU fisheries, we contend that a central reason is an issue of ineffective governance. Improved governance, appropriately designed for Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management (EBFM), is key to improving the system performance towards the societal objectives. We understand governance as a social process involving the interaction of governments, regional authorities, private industry, and civil society that collectively work towards steering the sector towards sustainability. This encompasses politics, policies, laws, norms, values, regulations, and institutions that guide the management and conservation of fishery resources. Meanwhile, fisheries management involves specific actions and strategies used to manage and conserve fishery resources, including implementing the rules and regulations set forth by fisheries governance and applying scientific principles to ensure sustainability of fish stocks. Historically, fisheries management has focused on the ‘thing’ being managed: fish. Such a focus has resulted in various technical and managerial outputs such as quotas, TACs, catch limits, gear sizes, MPAs, inter alia. Various institutions have also developed (e.g. Advisory Councils) alongside public policy measures such as the Common Fisheries Policy. While progress has been made in recent years, managing fisheries in a sustainable, integrated, and coordinated fashion remains a challenge. The question therefore is: what are the requirements for EU fisheries governance (and hence, management) to be effective? Trying to understand what makes fisheries management more effective (i.e. sustainable), requires us to ask questions about fisheries governance: to what extent are all relevant actors included in decision-making, able to speak to one another, coordinate activities, and work together to resolve key fisheries-related challenges? And what is the capability of actors to observe, define, and understand problems? To answer these questions, we developed and deployed an expert elicitation survey, informed by key governance dimensions and frameworks (the Aquaculture Governance Indicators and the Canadian Fisheries Research Network framework), sent to 245 respondents across selected regional seas (North Sea; Western Waters; Baltic; and Mediterranean) as part of the SEAwise project. In this presentation, we showcase results and analysis from this survey and reflect on how a human-centered governance approach can inform fisheries management, identify ‘weak spots’ that need attention to improve/make fisheries management more effective and address challenges. We argue achieving sustainable outcomes in Europe’s fisheries been a persistent challenge partly because of insufficient focus on the other dimension of fisheries management: people.
Title: From managing fish to managing people: requirements for effective fisheries governance and management in Europe
Description:
Despite the increasingly successful implementation of stock management under the EU Common Fisheries Policy, managing fisheries in a sustainable, integrated, and coordinated way remains a challenge.
In helping to explain the persistent challenge of achieving sustainable outcomes in EU fisheries, we contend that a central reason is an issue of ineffective governance.
Improved governance, appropriately designed for Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management (EBFM), is key to improving the system performance towards the societal objectives.
We understand governance as a social process involving the interaction of governments, regional authorities, private industry, and civil society that collectively work towards steering the sector towards sustainability.
This encompasses politics, policies, laws, norms, values, regulations, and institutions that guide the management and conservation of fishery resources.
Meanwhile, fisheries management involves specific actions and strategies used to manage and conserve fishery resources, including implementing the rules and regulations set forth by fisheries governance and applying scientific principles to ensure sustainability of fish stocks.
Historically, fisheries management has focused on the ‘thing’ being managed: fish.
Such a focus has resulted in various technical and managerial outputs such as quotas, TACs, catch limits, gear sizes, MPAs, inter alia.
Various institutions have also developed (e.
g.
Advisory Councils) alongside public policy measures such as the Common Fisheries Policy.
While progress has been made in recent years, managing fisheries in a sustainable, integrated, and coordinated fashion remains a challenge.
The question therefore is: what are the requirements for EU fisheries governance (and hence, management) to be effective? Trying to understand what makes fisheries management more effective (i.
e.
sustainable), requires us to ask questions about fisheries governance: to what extent are all relevant actors included in decision-making, able to speak to one another, coordinate activities, and work together to resolve key fisheries-related challenges? And what is the capability of actors to observe, define, and understand problems? To answer these questions, we developed and deployed an expert elicitation survey, informed by key governance dimensions and frameworks (the Aquaculture Governance Indicators and the Canadian Fisheries Research Network framework), sent to 245 respondents across selected regional seas (North Sea; Western Waters; Baltic; and Mediterranean) as part of the SEAwise project.
In this presentation, we showcase results and analysis from this survey and reflect on how a human-centered governance approach can inform fisheries management, identify ‘weak spots’ that need attention to improve/make fisheries management more effective and address challenges.
We argue achieving sustainable outcomes in Europe’s fisheries been a persistent challenge partly because of insufficient focus on the other dimension of fisheries management: people.

Related Results

Fisheries Science and Its Environmental Consequences
Fisheries Science and Its Environmental Consequences
Fisheries science emerged in the mid-19th century, when scientists volunteered to conduct conservation-related investigations of commercially important aquatic species for the gove...
Fisheries‐induced Evolution
Fisheries‐induced Evolution
AbstractModern fisheries have drastically changed the level and size dependence of mortality faced by fish populations: commercial fishing usually targets medium‐sized and large in...
Structural performance of fish market in Bogura district, Bangladesh
Structural performance of fish market in Bogura district, Bangladesh
One of the most important blossom trades in the economy of Bangladesh is fish marketing. To understand the current practices of fish market and marketing systems in Bogura district...
Common Fisheries Policy and its impact on the fisheries sector in Croatia
Common Fisheries Policy and its impact on the fisheries sector in Croatia
AbstractThe aim of the paper is: 1) to determine the key changes in the evolution process of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the Croatia’s fisheries policy and 2) to descr...
Delineating impact of climatic variable(s) on commercial fish landings in a tropical river through multi-species modelling
Delineating impact of climatic variable(s) on commercial fish landings in a tropical river through multi-species modelling
For effective fisheries management and sustainable development of fisheries in the Indian segment of the Brahmaputra River, it is crucial to examine how fish landing patterns have ...
Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance
Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance
The water crisis can alternatively be called a governance crisis. Thus, the demand for good water governance to ensure effective water resources management and to attain specific w...
How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
Background and Aim: College physical education (CPE) is a Key Stage in the transition from school physical education to national sports. Collaborative governance is an effective ne...

Back to Top